1 / 21

Does the presence of NL waves affect the conclusion that QL acceleration suffices ?

This study investigates the impact of NL waves on the conclusion that QL acceleration is sufficient to describe the acceleration process of radiation belt electrons. It explores the violation of QL assumptions and the conditions under which NL effects become important.

billbeasley
Download Presentation

Does the presence of NL waves affect the conclusion that QL acceleration suffices ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Does the presence of NL waves affect the conclusion that QL acceleration suffices? Jacob Bortnik Collaborators: Xin Tao, Richard M. Thorne Jay M. Albert, Wen Li

  2. Basic problem • Quaslinear (QL) diffusion theory used to model dynamic evolution of radiation belt electrons • Assumes ‘small-amplitude’, incoherent, linear interactions • Recent observations of ‘large amplitude’, coherent chorus waves • Violates QL assumptions! • Nonlinear effects expected • Does QL theory still suffice to describe the acceleration process? Cattell et al. [2008], First reports of large amplitude chorus, STEREO B ~ 240 mV/m, ~ 0.5-2 nT Monotonic & coherent (f~0.2 fce, ~2 kHz) Oblique (~ 45 - 60), Transient L~3.5 – 4.8, MLT~2 – 3:45, Lat ~ 21°-26°, AE ~800 nT

  3. When are nonlinear effects important? Example simple case: field aligned wave, non-relativistic particles wave adiabatic phase

  4. When are nonlinear effects important? “restoring” force “driving” force Conditions for NL: • Waves are “large” amplitude • Inhomogeneity is “low”, i.e., near the equator • Pitch angles are medium-high

  5. Three representative cases(a) small amplitude, ~1 pT wave(b) Large amplitude ~1 nT waves(c) Large amplitude, oblique, off-equatorial resonance Bortnik et al. [2008]

  6. EMIC-electron Interactions Diffusion US Advection: to higher a, i.e., more trapped! Trapping: lower a, higher E Albert & Bortnik [2009]

  7. [Bortnik et al., 2014]

  8. Amplitude threshold of QLT Tao et al. [2012] Quasilinear diffusion coefficients deviate from test-particle results in a systematic way.

  9. Resonant diffusion in velocity space [Bortnik et al., 2014]

  10. QL modeling of Oct 8-9 2012 storm [Thorne et al., 2013, Nature]

  11. Subpacket structure: full spectrum model Tao et al. [2012], GRL

  12. Repetition rate of chorus elements Tao et al. [2014]

  13. Example: rapidly growing tails: Relativistic turning acceleration Rapid acceleration on the scale of 10’s of minutes, to form a high-energy tail

  14. Summary and conclusions • Does the presence of NL waves affect the conclusion that QL acceleration suffices? • The devil’s in the details! Depends on … • Wave amplitude: ~100 pT can be linear or NL, ~1 nT usually NL • Latitude of w-p interaction: equatorial NL, high latitude: becomes more linear • Electron energy: Most NL effects in 10’s-100’s keV range. Relativistic particles ~MeV usually fairly linear • Pitch Angle: small PA more linear, medium PA (~50-80 deg) most NL • Wave Normal: low WN most effective for NL effects, large WN not very effective • Harmonic content: subpackets linearize interactions somewhat • Repetition rate: more frequent chorus elements -> more linear • Look for rapidly growing (<1 hr) ‘tails’ in the electron distribution

  15. BACK UPS

  16. Subpacket structure: a Two-wave model Two-wave model Tao et al. [2013] subpacket structure modifies the single-wave scattering picture

  17. Relativistic turning acceleration Rapid acceleration on the scale of 10’s of minutes, to form a high-energy tail

  18. The wave environment in space Meredith et al [2004]

  19. Objective Reality, somewhere in this region … 2. Quasilinear theory • Waves are all weak • Wideband & incoherent • Interactions uncorrelated • Global modeling US • 1. Single-wave/test-particle • Waves can be strong • Narrowband & coherent • Interactions all correlated • Microphysics

  20. Current picture: Collective, incoherent wave effects • Particles drift around the earth • Accumulate scattering effects of: • ULF • Chorus • Hiss (plumes) • Magnetosonic • Characteristic effects of each waves are different and time dependent Thorne [2010] GRL “frontiers” review

  21. Diffusion surfaces • Resonant interaction: Which particles are affected? • Non-relativistic form: • Relativistic form: • Resonant diffusion surface: confinement in velocity space • Non-relativistic form:

More Related