1 / 15

Dialogue and debate: the new challenges of Science Communication

Dialogue and debate: the new challenges of Science Communication Steve Miller University College London. Mid-1990s. Deficit Model. Top down One way Paternalistic. BSE and GM. How neutral and/or trustworthy is science?. Sheila Jasanoff: “Civic dislocation”

bin
Download Presentation

Dialogue and debate: the new challenges of Science Communication

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dialogue and debate: the new challenges of Science Communication Steve Miller University College London Mid-1990s

  2. Deficit Model Top down One way Paternalistic

  3. BSE and GM How neutral and/or trustworthy is science? Sheila Jasanoff: “Civic dislocation” Trust in the government vanished, and people looked elsewhere for information and advice. In the UK, public confidence … rests on the reliability of persons … in the USA …trust rests in formal processes Gregory and Miller: The public are not quick to think the worst of scientists …the key is trust … established through the negotiation of a mutual understanding

  4. Ulrich Beck Risk Society:Towards a New Modernity (1986) From wealth distribution to risk distribution The new paradigm: How can the risks and hazards systematically produced be prevented, minimised, dramatised or channelled “If the public only know what technical people know, they would be put at ease” - wrong. Even in their highly mathematical or technical garb, statements on risk contain statements of the type that is how we want to live … … in their concern with risk, the natural sciences have disempowered themselves somewhat, forced themselves towards democracy.

  5. 2000 - the impact of “scandals” - a “crisis of trust” …the new mood for dialogue

  6. The mood changes across Europe At the dawn of the 21st Century … our society is faced with the challenge of finding its proper place in a world shaken by economic and political turbulence. … science, technology and innovation are indispensable to meet this challenge. However, there are indications that the immense potential … is out of step with European citizens … Science activities need to centre around the needs and aspirations of Europe’s citizens to a greater extent than at present. 38 actions involving scientists, governments and the media

  7. Different approaches • PUS • PUSH • Culture Scientifique

  8. POST Open Channels

  9. Dialogue and debate - five questions Dia-logue v. mono-aud - who’s talking and who’s listening? Policy orientation - who’s allowed in? The role of the media - media values v. policy expectations Consensus v. balanced opposition Communication - who’s trained for what?

  10. Dia-logue v. Mono-aud • Is Dialogue the new Deficit Model - better persuasion • Is Dialogue the new Deficit Model - the Dialogue “Experts” • Is Dialogue the new Deficit Model - the “wrong” answer • Is Dialogue the new Deficit Model - who responds to what

  11. Who’s allowed in? Perugia Science Festival 1985: Scientist must “consider it their duty” to communicate NOW: • Policy advice - elite to elite • Public consultation - representative citizens • Public outcome - “confident consumers”

  12. The role of the media Much emphasis put on role of the media - BUT • Media have their own agenda • Media have their own values • Media have their own practices • Media “like” bad news • Media like conflict

  13. Consensus v. balanced opposition Consensus conference model - homogenous public? • Tradition - issues are explored • Tradition - facts are contested • Tradition - interests are different Outcome - winners and losers

  14. Communication training www.ensconet.org Modules for Science Communication Training • Writing for and talking to the media, plus media culture • Presenting for policy makers and science centres • Talking and listening • Communicating risk and controversy Training enhances confidence … … but does it make better communicators?

  15. Dialogue and Debate: the new challenges of Science Communication Steve Miller University College London s.miller@ucl.ac.uk

More Related