1 / 67

WATER CONFLICT, SECURITY AND COOPERATION

WATER CONFLICT, SECURITY AND COOPERATION. Dr. Marwa Daoudy IUHEI (Geneva), CERI (Paris). « Water is not necessary for life , it is life » Antoine de St-Exupéry, Terre des Hommes, 1939. WATER, AN INTERNATIONAL ISSUE. PARTIAL PERSPECTIVE:

binah
Download Presentation

WATER CONFLICT, SECURITY AND COOPERATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WATER CONFLICT, SECURITY AND COOPERATION Dr. Marwa Daoudy IUHEI (Geneva), CERI (Paris)

  2. « Water is not necessary for life, it is life » Antoine de St-Exupéry,Terre des Hommes,1939

  3. WATER, AN INTERNATIONAL ISSUE • PARTIAL PERSPECTIVE: • « Crisis » or « war» because of freshwater scarcity – « geopolitics of water » • INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE OF THE ENVIRONMENT: • Sanitary, environmental, political, institutional and financial issues

  4. MAP • Water, an International Issue • The Debate: Water and IR • Benefit-Sharing

  5. ELEMENTS OF A CRISIS • INDICATORS: • Global data • Resource use per person per year • Rate of utilization • Dependency rate on external sources

  6. THE WATER CYCLE

  7. WATER-RELATED DATA • 263 internationally shared basins (A. Wolf, Oregon State, Water Database) • 70 in Africa, 55 in Europe, 40 in Asia, 33 in South America, 6 in the Middle East • 1400 million cubic kilometers (millions of billions of m3), 70% of the earth, only 2.5% of freshwater • Renewable resources: 40 000 km3/year, i.e. 0,007% of the total water volume • Not an issue of global availability but geographic distribution: 9 countries – 60% of world water resources.

  8. CRISIS - INDICATORS (I) • Availability per person per year: • > 1700 m3/h/an: relative water sufficiency • Between 1700 and 1000 m3/p/year: water stress • Between 1000 and 500 m3/p/y: scarcity line • < 500 m3/p/y: absolute scarcity

  9. CRISIS - INDICATORS (II) • Rate of dependence on external sources: • Upstream/downstream (main areas of tension) • E.g: Turkmenistan (98%), Egypt (97%), Syria (80%)

  10. INDICATORS (III) • Water utilizations: • 70% to agriculture (ME: 80-90%) • Global food: need to find a balance between agriculture/industry/domestic use

  11. ELEMENTS OF A CRISIS (I) • Health-related dilemmas: • Water quality (80% of diseases are water-borne in poor countries - WHO) • Pollution (pesticides and salinity of water and soils)

  12. ELEMENTS OF A CRISIS (II) • Demographic growth: • World population: x 3 in 100 years • Pressures on water: x 6 in 100 years • Mainly in developing countries • Increased urbanization: + pressure on water (90% of demographic growth is absorbed by cities) • Green Revolution: food security, intensive irrigation practices (vs. Blue Revolution )

  13. ORIGINS AND CONSEQUENCES • Increased water demand (demographic growth) • Decreased water supply and water quality • Main areas of conflict

  14. INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE • Decision-making process? • Execution of mandates? • Accountability, responsibility?

  15. THE DEBATE • Institutional, economic, ethical, strategic and political issues at stake • No common vision or unified strategy

  16. INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE OF THE ENVIRONMENT • Efficiency of international agreements • Legitimacy of procedures • Equitable share of responsibilities

  17. International Water Governance • Environmental, economic and social issues • Sustainable development: • Promoting Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) • Global good vs. Economic good • Water ethics: International Water Law

  18. MULTILATERALISM • Promoting International Water Governance: • Stockholm, Rio, Johannesburg • 1972, 1992, 2002

  19. INTEGRATED WATER MANAGEMENT (IWRM) * Sustainable water management and sustainable development * Integrating sometimes opposed interests (ecosystems/human needs, surface water/underground resources, upstream/downstream interests, different uses…). * Chapter 18 of Agenda 21 (Rio): water is an economic good

  20. Symbolic dimension: water = gift from God= public good Water costs? WATER AND ECONOMICS

  21. WATER ECONOMICS: THE DEBATE • Regional scarcity: need to calculate total distribution costs • Global economic costs: distribution + opportunity + external • Conclusion: need to enhance economic efficiency and environmental, ecological sustainability. Avoid « tragedy of common goods ».

  22. ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS • Private investments in water sector • Investments to increase water supplies (supply management): desalination • « Virtual water »: food imports = water imports (1500 m3/ton of cereals) • Water markets

  23. ISSUES AT STAKE • Privatization of water sector: risks • Water access as human right • Water as global public good • Third way: between total privatization and total State control

  24. WATER ETHICS • Need to enhance cooperation among States • International legal standards • Slow but steady construction of IL on utilization of international watercourses for non-navigational purposes (United Nations Convention, 1997).

  25. CONCLUSIONS • Multidimensional issue • Water: human survival, economic growth and political stability • « Hydro-politics »: link between hydraulic issues strategic, economic and political levels (cooperation, conflict, security).

  26. WATER AND IR

  27. The Theoretical Debate • I. Water Conflict & Cooperation: some IR theories • II. Debating water issues in the 1990s: environmental security vs. virtual water • III. Debating water issues today: benefit sharing vs. water rights.

  28. Water Specificity – Some Theoretical implications • Global Common Good = need for collective action • Avoid « tragedy of the commons » (Hardin, 1968) or unilateral abuse by developing common and organized management of resources.

  29. Water, Conflict and Security

  30. Conflict over Water • Classification criteria (Zeitoun & Warner, 2006): • Development disputes • Control of water resources • Water as political tool • Water as military target • Water as military tool • Inter-State • Intra-State

  31. Water Conflict and Cooperation • Regime Theory: regional institutions to manage cooperative regimes for natural resources. • International Governance: agent-based resolution of collective problems at local, national and international level.

  32. Water Conflict & Cooperation • Power Matrix: additional factors (other than asymmetry) to explain link between water and conflict (interests, riparian position, projected power). • Inherent asymmetry as specific nature of conflicts over water (Haftendorn, 2000). • Conflict resolution should address asymmetric structure of conflict

  33. Water Conflict vs. Water Cooperation • Environmental security vs. virtual water (Pessimists vs. Optimists) • Debate in 1990s: very high risks of violent conflict because of increasing water scarcity (e.g., Middle East) • Vs. no conflict despite water scarcity and tensions: additional supply through water embedded in food imports

  34. GEOPOLITICAL STUDIES • Conventional Geopolitics: • Natural resource endowments and geography are defining features of a State’s status • Geographical and environmental determinism

  35. WATER - GEOPOLITICS • Neo-Malthusianism: « WATER WARS» • Demographic growth, resource scarcity and violent conflict • Cornucopian perspectives: cooperation vs. conflict • Available but mismanaged resources • Need to evaluate resources economically (price)

  36. WATER WARS?

  37. The Debate • The inevitability of water conflicts is supported by quantitative and qualitative analysis. The link between water and violent conflict is thus confirmed. • As a strategic security concern, water can become a source of conflict but interdependent riparian states are more likely to cooperate over water.

  38. Water & Security • A new debate on national security: critical security studies (CSS) • Enlargement of threats: from traditional (military, economic) to non-traditional (environment, resources, health) • Link between environmental problems and emergence of conflicts • « Environmental security »

  39. Research Questions • What linkages are established between the environment and security? How can they explain the successful securitization of the environment as a referent object since the 1990s. • Some would argue that resource scarcities have been over-securitized in the last decades. How? Why? What about current trends towards the securitization of the environment in relation to development?

  40. Environmental Security (1) • Transnational environmental problems • Resource-based conflicts

  41. Environmental Security (2) • Toronto School (Homer-Dixon, 1993, 1994) • Oslo School (Gledditsch, 1998, 2000) • Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars (ECSP), Washington.

  42. THE SECURITIZATION OF WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT • Link between environmental problems (water) and national security issues • Threat perception • Securitization of environmental problems: maintain local biosphere as an essential support on which will depend all other human activities (Buzan et al., 1998, p. 74)

  43. UNDERLYING CONCEPTS • Negotiation • Power (asymmetry) • Conflict (resolution)

  44. Water, Conflict and Negotiation

  45. NEGOTIATION ELEMENTS • Actors • Structure • Process • Strategies • Results

  46. ACTORS • Defining the Hegemon: State that temporarily gains a preponderance of power in the international and/or regional system • It can unilaterally dominate the rules and procedures that guide political and economic relations – and water dynamics

  47. STRUCTURE • Asymmetry of power (upstream/downstream, military, economic resources) • History of relations (politics, culture, etc..) • Structural power (1st dimension of power)

  48. PROCESS • Cooperative, integrative • (win-win) • Conflict-oriented, distributive • (win-lose) • Mixed (but predominantly…)

  49. STRATEGIES • Bargaining Power (« 2nd face of power ») • Time • Costs of no agreement

  50. AGREEMENTS • Bilateral vs. basin-wide, temporary vs. lasting, stable, unstable • Structure of agreements = power structure (Schelling, 1960) • BATNA: Best Alternative to No Agreement

More Related