1 / 31

Has Rio mattered for India? Agreements and Achievements in Sustainable Development

Has Rio mattered for India? Agreements and Achievements in Sustainable Development . Ligia Noronha TERI Workshop on Institutional Framework on Sustainable Development International Centre for Environment Audit and Sustainable Development, (iCED) Jaipur 28 September 2011.

blaise
Download Presentation

Has Rio mattered for India? Agreements and Achievements in Sustainable Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Has Rio mattered for India?Agreements and Achievements in Sustainable Development Ligia NoronhaTERI Workshop on Institutional Framework on Sustainable Development International Centre for Environment Audit and Sustainable Development, (iCED) Jaipur 28 September 2011

  2. Sustainable development A development path is sustainable if it meets needs of the present without compromising the ability to do the same in future. Sustainable development is a process of change in which the exploitation of resources, the direction of investments, the orientation of technological and institutional change enhance not merely the current but the future potential to meet basic needs. Needs are socially and culturally determined and the only definition that is sustainable is one which is accepted by the people themselves. • Requires that: • the basic needs of all persons should be met. • The affluent everywhere aim at consumption standards which, in time if not immediately, can be reached by everyone and which are within the bounds of the ecological possible. • A society’s ability to meet basic needs be maximized both by building up its sustainable productive potential and by institutional arrangements which offer a more equitable access to resources and livelihood opportunities. • Long before these limits are reached the concerned community should (a) ensure equitable access to the constrained resource and (b) reorient its technological efforts to relieve the pressure on the constraint. • The elements in natural systems critical for the maintenance of life be identified and all human activities be oriented so as to avoid endangering these elements locally, regionally or globally. Nitin Desai, W0152c/ND/es/23.06.86

  3. Sustainable development Wide acceptability of concept But inadequate political commitment As a goal and mission of countless organizations Fuzziness of the concept which interestingly allows consensus building Provides a common language Unifying core - built around needs, ecological limits, and social acceptability Long term, beyond electoral cycles Requires cross sectoral thinking But silos mentality; protection of turf Needs recognition of trade offs; Everything is a not a win win Requires burden sharing

  4. What do we mean when we speak of SD? The interfaces The paradigm

  5. IEG and Sustainable Development TERI, 2011

  6. About key international institutions working on SD issues • UN system does not lack institutions to deliver on sustainable development. What it does lack is coordination and coherence within the system. • CSD has become a negotiating forum, not dialogic enough to bring various stakeholders together on contested issues • UNEP should not hanker for political space and power. Instead, it should focus on strengthening its current functions, as an ‘implementing agency’; and as a ‘coordinating agency’ that helps in clustering of MEAs and REAs. • ECOSOC is incomplete without an environmental arm • MEAs lack coherence and need more national implementation.

  7. State of the world • The MDG report 2011 suggests that reaching all the MDGs by 2015 will be a challenge as the most vulnerable are still beyond reach. This is especially so in Sub Saharan Africa and South Asia. • There are still 1.2 billion very poor people (those living on less than $1 a day) and 40% of the world’s population still lives on less than $2/day; • The worlds’ richest 500 individuals have a combined income greater than that of the poorest 416 million, the average income in the richest 20 countries is 37 times that in the poorest 20 – a ratio that has doubled in the past 40 years; • More than 1 billion people in low- and middle-income countries lack access to safe water, 1.4 billion have no access to electricity , and 2 billion lack adequate sanitation ; • Two-thirds of all fisheries are exploited at or beyond their sustainable limits, and half or more of the world’s coral reefs may perish in this century. • Three of nine interlinked planetary boundaries (rate of biodiversity loss, climate change and human interference with the nitrogen cycle), have already been overstepped as per recent estimates.

  8. New and emerging challenges • Transnational risks such as communicable disease, climate change, water conflicts, energy security, cyber security, and terrorism • Since 2008, we have witnessed high financial volatility and uneven growth performance which has increased social distributive tensions. • Increased burden of disease in developing countries, estimated between 25-25%, attributed to environmental causes. Risks are linked to poverty, gender and social factors. • Many of these security concerns, serious enough on their own, also have inter linkages, e.g., food-energy-water, climate-energy-security • An increasing international development and environmental commitments’ funding gap: estimated in the range of $324-336 bn/ year between 2012 and 2017 ( $156 bn for climate change, $168-180 bn for ODA). • A reduced multilateralism

  9. Global Partnerships will depend on commitment of nations to development CDI, 2010 Source: http://www.cgdev.org/section/initiatives/_active/cdi

  10. India’s engagement with international sustainable development • Active engagement with the concept since it first came into use • Engaged with many of its own challenges; but has many innovations to offer the international community • Responses to Climate change are ensconced in the “common but differentiated responsibility” principle • A wide array of laws, policies and programmes that address SD issues. Some key ones at the interface

  11. India and International Agreements • India has been in the forefront of international agreements. • WTO Agreement (1995), • RTA with ASEAN (2009), • Bilateral Investments Promotion and Protection Act (BIPAs), • Convention on Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination (1968), • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1979), Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW, 1993), C • Convention on the Rights of a Child • India is one of the founding members of the ILO

  12. Major Environmental agreements India is a party to • Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, 1971- designated 25 wetland sites in India as Ramsar Sites of International Importance • CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Flora and Fauna • Montreal Protocol under the Vienna Convention on substances that deplete the ozone layer, 1987 • Three Chemical Conventions • Basel Convention on trans-boundary movement of hazardous wastes, 1989 • Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) • Rotterdam Convention on Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade (entered into force from 2004) • Rio Conventions • Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), 1992 • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1992 and Kyoto Protocol • United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD)

  13. Indian laws at the SD interfaces

  14. India’s policies/programmes at the interfaces

  15. Economic Achievements • 7.2% GDP growth rate in the past decade with an 8.25% GDP growth rate between 2005-06 to 2009-10. • Shifts in economic structure– declining share of agriculture in the GDP, rise in share of industry and services in the last two decades. • MSME sector : 26 million units and employs about 60 million people, contributing to about 8% of GDP, 45% of manufactured output and 40% export (Economic Survey 2010-11) • FDI inflows increased from 148 million USD in 1991-92 to 18,800 million USD in 2009-10. • Exports increased from 6.2% in 1990-91 to 12% in 2010-11. • Important policies, programmes and legal framework put in place: Industrial Policy Statement (1991), National Rural Livelihood Mission, Right to Information Act (2005), National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (2005), Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Mission (2005), Public Liability Insurance Act (1991), etc.

  16. Economic Challenges • Infrastructure shortages, particularly in the rural areas • Employment opportunities in urban areas higher than rural areas-- leading to high levels of rural-urban migration • Urban population growing at a faster rate than rural population causing a huge divide. • High levels of inflation in the country • High fiscal deficits; need to restructure spending patterns based on identified priorities. • Strengthening of financial reforms to channel savings effectively into investment, meet funding requirements for infrastructure and enhance financial stability

  17. Social Achievements • Process of a demographic transition from high fertility, high mortality to low fertility, low mortality rates--population growth declined from 2.2 in 1994 to 1.9 in 2001. • Fertility rate reduced from 3.9 in 1990 to 2.8 in 2010; life expectancy increased from 55.9 in 1991 to 63.5 in 2002-06. • Literacy rate increased from 52.2% in 1991 to 74.4 in 2011. • Sex ratio gone up from 927 in 1991 to 940 in 2011 • Number of people with water supply facilities increased from 78% in 1981 to 91% in 2004. • Financial inclusion being encouraged for social and economic upliftment of the disadvantaged and vulnerable. • Important policies, programmes and legal framework put in place: National Agricultural Policy, National Mission on Sustainable Agriculture (2008), Integrated Rural Development Programme (1970s), Education for All Campaign (Sarva Shiksha Abhiyaan), National Rural Health Mission (2005), National Rural Livelihood Mission (NRLM, 2009) National Policy for Empowerment of Women (2001), CEDAW (2003), Public Liability Insurance Act (1991)

  18. Social Challenges • Not able to achieve most MDGs related to health indicators--mostly due to inadequate access to public sector health facilities and the quality at which it is supplied. • Decline in child sex ratio to 914 in 2011- lowest since independence. • High urban-rural disparities in terms of people living below poverty line, infant mortality rate, maternal mortality rate, literacy, etc. • Need to focus on quality and access to education in the country more than running after numbers. • The proportion of population that has dietary energy consumption below 2100/2400 kcal in India seen to rise since 1987‐88 with about 64% below the norm in 1987‐ 88 increasing to 76% in 2004‐05 (figure may be higher with rising food prices in last 2 years).

  19. Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)

  20. Underweight children 40% of children < 3 yrs will be underweight by 2015 as compared to target of 26.8% Key reasons: inadequate breastfeeding, micronutrient inadequacies, absence of child and maternity benefits, poverty, nutrition education, Source:MOSPI, India Country Report 2009, MDG civil society report, 2010

  21. Infant (under five) mortality UN5 mortality can come down to 70/1000 live births as against target of 42/1000 • key reasons • pneumonia, measles, diarrhoea, malaria and neonatal conditions that occur during pregnancy and during or immediately after birth. • Lack of health care, maternal and child malnutrition and poor environmental health conditions Source: GOI, India Country Report 2009, MDG civil society report, 2010

  22. Maternal health MMR is expected to come to 135/100,000 as compared to 109 target Key reasons: main causes of maternal deaths are as follows: Haemorrhage (38%), Sepsis (11%) and Abortions (8%), Obstructed Labour (5%), Hypertensive Disorder (5%) and other conditions (34%) (p 61 of MDG Report) Maternal malnutrition is another key issue (RGI, 2006) Source: MOSPI, India Country Report 2009, MDG civil society report, 2010

  23. Access to water, sanitation, clean energy Rural-urban divide Gender-poverty energy nexus Even where infrastructure exists, service delivery is poor Source: TERI, 2009

  24. Sheer scale of the goals Governance constraints Capacity & resources Coordination Other priorities? Extreme events in some states Falling external assistance Bottlenecks to achieving MDGs India’s external assistance as a percentage to total GDP Source: Economic survey, 2009, IMF Economic database, 2010

  25. Environment Achievements • Increase in forest and tree cover by 728 km2 and 1106 km2 respectively in 2009 as compared to 2005; 21 percent of geographical area under forest cover. • According to the State Forest Report 2009, in the last 10 years, forest cover in the country has increased by 3.31 million hectares, showing an average 0.46% increase every year. • Energy intensity (total primary energy supply with respect to GDP) declined over time. For 1980-90, it was estimated at 1.08 while the same for 1990-91 to 2003-04 was estimated to be 0.82. • Last ten years has seen close to 180,000 rural habitations being connected to all weather roads in the country. • India has also become one of the Clean Development Mechanism project host countries in the world with projects being undertaken at various levels. • Important policies, programmes and legal framework put in place: National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC, 2008), State Action Plan on Climate Change, Joint Forest Management Act (1990), Biological Diversity Act (2002), Environment (Protection) Act (1986), National Environmental Tribunal Act (1998), eight NAPCC missions, etc. • XIII th Finance Commission recognizes that environment is a shared legacy with future generations, and makes a beginning in introducing an environmental dimension into intergovernmental fiscal arrangements.

  26. Environmental Challenges • Poor urban air quality in all Indian cities due to increasing vehicular fleet, industrial expansion, etc. • Water availability, land and food security a rising concern in the country. • Energy security (electricity and fuel) is still a huge problem. Energy poverty is a growing problem, specially in rural areas and it has major health implications. • Unsustainable patterns of consumption and production • Increase in solid waste and e-waste • Climate change, natural disasters and hazards risks • Slow diffusion of climate and environmental friendly technologies Conservative estimates suggest that environmental degradation takes a toll of about 4% of India’s GDP (morbidity due to unclean air and water, productivity loss due to degraded land and forests) and over 800,000 premature deaths (due to air and water pollution).

  27. Example: SD issues around the Western Ghats - a biodiversity hotspot • Why should mining not be banned to arrest the further loss of cultural and biological diversity and destruction of the ecology of the Western Ghats? (WGEEP) • Why should mining be privileged over other land, waterways, forests and groundwater uses/users? • How have/are the intergenerational questions around mineral depletion been addressed? • Why is there so much illegal mining? Who is doing anything about it? • What about the corruption at all levels of jurisdiction? Some Questions that we have been confronted with from stakeholders, 2010-2011, WGEEP and Goa

  28. Regulatory coordination deficits • Strong set of environmental rules and regulations in place, but • EIAs are fraudulent; Conditions of Environmental clearance are not observed • Discrete, stand alone EIAs when cumulative impact studies of development are needed • Not enough capacity at SPCB level • Absence of local monitoring institutions • Poor redressal of people’s concerns • Government machinery is perceived skewed in favour of corporates. • Lack of knowledge of ground realities in villages where several developments are taking place • Illegal activities: logging, hunting, mining

  29. Strengthening sustainable development governance- what can ICED do • Provide improved environmental accounting to support informed policy making and policy engagement • Draw attention to niche areas (co-benefits) • Analyse regulatory deficits • Help improve benefit sharing of development projects • Work towards environment and resource adjusted income accounting • Creation of Incentives for conservation and innovations • Payments for ecosystem services • Reward good corporate/state performance • Encourage green innovations • Data bases need to be developed which can support regulation and good development planning, for example spatial data bases.

  30. Thank you

  31. Dr. Ligia Noronha,Director, Resources and Global Security Division, TERIemail: ligian@teri.res.inphone: 011-24682100, 41504900

More Related