1 / 26

Imaging from Projections

Imaging from Projections. Eric Miller With minor modifications by Dana Brooks. Outline. Problem formulation What’s a projection? Application examples Why is this interesting? The forward problem The Radon transform The Fourier Slice Theorem The Inverse Problem

brigit
Download Presentation

Imaging from Projections

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Imaging from Projections Eric Miller With minor modifications by Dana Brooks These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  2. Outline • Problem formulation • What’s a projection? • Application examples • Why is this interesting? • The forward problem • The Radon transform • The Fourier Slice Theorem • The Inverse Problem • Undoing the Radon transform with the help of Fourier • Filtered Backprojection Algorithm • Complications and Extensions These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  3. t y x A Projection The total amount of f(x,y) along the line defined by t and q These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  4. Application Examples • CAT scans: • X ray source moves around the body • f(x,y) is the density of the tissue • MRI • Not as clear cut what the “projection” is, but in a peculiar way, the math is the same (remind me to talk about this when we get to the MRI Imaging equation …) • f(x,y) is the spin density of molecules in the tissue • Synthetic Aperture Radar • Satellite moves down a linear track collecting radar echoes of the ground • Used for remote sensing, surveillance, … • Again: math is the same (after much pain and anguish) • f(x,y) is the reflectivity of the earth surface These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  5. Motivation • In all cases, one observes a bunch of sum or integrals of a quantity over a region of space: these are “projections” • The goal is to use a collection of these projections to recover f(x,y). • Here we will talk about the full data case • Assume we see for all q and t • Limited view tomography a topic for advanced course These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  6. t y x The Radon Transform Polar equation for line: So the line exists only where this equation is true Function oft and q These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  7. What does it do? Simplest case: f(x,y) a d function: only exists at a single point • Proof only by limiting argument as products of d’s not well defined • Interpretation: • A “function” in (t,q) space which “is” 1 along a sinusoidal curve and zero elsewhere: note that a point in 2D  a curve • Say y0 = 0 and x0 = 1 then this is an “image” which “is” 1 whent = cos q These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  8. Note that we draw as a rectangular “image” in t and q In Pictures Kind of 2D impulse response (PSF) y t q x The Image Called the Radon Transform (a.k.a.the sinogram) These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  9. More Examples t q t q These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  10. Fourier Slice Theorem • Key idea here and for a large number of other problems • Analytically relate the 1D Fourier transform of P to the 2D Fourier transform of f. • Why? • If we can do this, then a simple inverse 2D Fourier gives us back f from the “data” P. These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  11. Recall 2D Fourier Transform Analysis Synthesis • “Space” variable x goes with “frequency” variable u • “Space” variable y goes with “frequency” variable v • (u,v) called “spatial frequency domain” These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  12. Fourier – Slice Theorem (FST) • Let F(u,v) be defined as on last slide • Define Sq(w) as the 1D Fourier transform of P along t • for some frequency variable w • FST says that Sq is equal to F(u,v) along a line • tilted at an angle q with respect to the (u,v) • coordinate system • To make this more precise … These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  13. v F(u,v) along line w u Fourier-Slice t 1D Fourier Transform y x Variables w and q are the polar form of u and v So FST is: These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  14. Reconstruction Implications v • Collect data from lots and lots of projections. • Take 1D FT of each to get one line in 2D frequency space • Fill up 2D spatial frequency space on a polar grid • Interpolate onto rectangular grid • Inverse 2D FT and we are done!! u These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  15. An Alternate ApproachFiltered Backprojection • This requires lots of Fourier Transforms • This means we can’t begin processing until we have all slices • Turns out there’s a more efficient way to organize things • This requires “ugly” interpolation, worse at high frequencies The derivation of this algorithm is perhaps one of the most illustrative examples of how we can obtain a radically differentcomputer implementation by simply re-writing the fundamentalexpressions for the underlying theory - Kak and Slaley, CTI These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  16. w FBP Motivation in Pictures v v w u u • In practice, we measure over lines. • Idea: build a 2D filter which covers the line, but has the same “weight” as the wedge at that frequency, w • In other words “mush” triangle to a rectangle • Then “sum up” filtered projections By linearity, could in theory break up reconstruction intocontribution from independent“wedges” in 2D Fourier space • For K projections, the width of the wedge at w is just These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  17. FBP Theory Now, change right side from polar to rectangular To get rectangular coordinates in space, polar in frequency: These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  18. FBP Theory II Make use of two facts: To arrive at Backproject Filter (in space) These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  19. w FBP Interpretation • Recall from linear systems • So |w| filter is more or less a differentiator. Accentuated high frequency information leads to problems with noise amplification • In practice, roll off response. w These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  20. FBP Interpretation Backprojection: Note that Qq(t) needs only one (filtered) projection Think of this as Qq(t) evaluated at the point t = xcosq + y sinq Sum up over allangles t • Along this line in “image space” set the value to • Qq(t0) • All points get a value • Do for all angles • Add up y Region we arereconstructing x These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  21. FBP Example Orig. Recon Zoom These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  22. Limited data I:Angle decimation These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  23. Limited data II:Limited Angle These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  24. Artifact Mitigation • Take a more matrix-based “inverse problems” perspective • Discretized Radon transform, data, and object to arrive at a forward model • Where C has many fewer rows than columns • Use SVD, TSVD, Tikhonov, or other favorite regularization scheme to improve reconstruction results • Note: significant move from analytical to numerical inversion means a basic shift in how we are approaching the problem. No more FBP (at least not easily) These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  25. Other Fourier Imaging Applications v v u u • Diffraction tomography • Collects data on petal shaped regions of Fourier space • Very limited view • More sophisticated math than X ray • Arises in geophysical and medical imaging problems • Standard SAR • Collects data on wedge shaped regions of Fourier space • Very limited view • Similar math to X-ray These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

  26. Generalized Radon Transforms • Radon transform = integral of object over straight lines • Many extensions • Integration over planes in 3D • Over circles in 2D (different type of SAR) • Over much more arbitrary mathematical structures (asymptotic case of some acoustics problems with space varying background). • Of weighted object function (attenuated Radon transform) These slides based almost entirely on a set provided by Prof. Eric Miller

More Related