1 / 21

“Southeast Asia in Asia’s Regional Architecture” Amitav Achaarya Sint Sint 4013R324-4

The Strong in the World of the Weak. “Southeast Asia in Asia’s Regional Architecture” Amitav Achaarya Sint Sint 4013R324-4 6 th January 2014. Contents. Introduction Evolution of ASEAN’s role in Asian Regionalism Debates in Regional Architecture The US Role and its Alliances

brit
Download Presentation

“Southeast Asia in Asia’s Regional Architecture” Amitav Achaarya Sint Sint 4013R324-4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Strong in the World of the Weak “Southeast Asia in Asia’s Regional Architecture” Amitav Achaarya SintSint 4013R324-4 6th January 2014

  2. Contents • Introduction • Evolution of ASEAN’s role in Asian Regionalism • Debates in Regional Architecture • The US Role and its Alliances • Principles of Southeast Asian and Asian Regionalism • Conclusion

  3. Introduction ASEAN has been able to "lead" Asia Regionalism • Why ? Theoretical perspectives (Realism, Constructivism) • How? Four points

  4. Soft realism Vs Constructivism • Individual members are lack of power but collectively they acquire enough bargaining power and could influence the attention of great powers through its regional institutions • ASEAN, binding together through soft power of national identities to have the leading role in the region

  5. Logic of Soft Realism • Institutions control by weaker states, less threatening • Enjoy more legitimacy than institution created by stronger powers

  6. I. Evolution of ASEAN’ role in Asian Regionalism • Post WW II : unimportant role • During Cold War: marked the high point of ASEAN-led regionalism • Post Cold War: as a central stage in East Asian regionalism

  7. Post WW II: Asian Regionalism • pan-Asian, Afro-Asian, sub-regional (Southeast Asian), trans-Pacific (Asia-Pacific), and East Asia • India’s role: the first Asian conference: 1947- 49 • pan-Asian sentiment: Bandung Asia-African Conference in 1955 • Indonesia and Myanmar (Burma) performed initial regionalist (pan-Asian)concepts • No clear separation between South and Southeast Asia. • Sovereignty and nonintervention is symbol of early Asian regionalism

  8. During Cold War: Formation of ASEAN • 1967, founded by five original members • ASEAN’s model is informal, Non legalistic, and sovereignty-enhancing cooperation • Southeast Asian countries were cautious of dominated by "outside“ regional powers • Political and security as a major concern • Marked as the high point of ASEAN-led regionalism

  9. Post Cold War: East Asian Regionalism • APEC, ARF: new ideas of cooperative security for practical implementation • APEC, ARF: ASEAN becomes the centre stage • APT then EAS towards the final goal of East Asian Community

  10. II. Debates in Regional Architecture Cause: Asian Economic crisis of 1997 • Two Major Issues: the direction of ASEAN ASEAN reform: economic and security spheres the Role of ASEAN Broader regional institution (two main perspectives: narrower and broader _ APT Vs EAS_ inclusive and exclusive)

  11. ASEAN Reform • Economic area Thailand : flexible engagement (nonintervention issue) Singapore: ASEAN economic community (ASEAN Charter: institutionalized and legalized) • Security area Indonesia: ASEAN security community (regional human right mechanism and enshrining democracy)

  12. Broader regional institution • Two main perspectives Exclusive : Malaysia (supported by China) APT toward East Asia Community Inclusive : East Asian regionalism Open regionalism and cooperative security (Singapore & Indonesia: supported by Japan, close ties the US)

  13. ASEAN’s view: Other regional organizations • APEC : nervous on the US dominant Washington Agenda for trade liberalization • ARF: remain the driver’s seat Still vague in interest or regional issues: south china sea, Taiwan issue, Korean Peninsula Workable in transnational issues: terrorism and transnational crime

  14. III. The US Role and its Alliances • Perspectives on the US’s Role - Southeast Asian states: regional view - ASEAN members states: individual (regional friends and allies) - Intra-ASEAN differences

  15. Southeast Asian states: regional view - Limited the US interest and engagement in broader • ASEAN members: • Greatest challenges for the US indifference and dominance • the US emphasis on APEC vehicle for trade liberalization • the US ‘s regional friends and allies not embrace in the EAS • Intra-ASEAN : • difference over the US military presence during and after cold war • US bilateralism and regional ASEAN-led multilateralism

  16. IV. The Principles and Norms:Southeast Asian and Asian Regionalism • Basic Principles Reducing interstate wars Enhancing domestic stability Preventing any single outside powers • Other Principles Open and nonexclusionary regionalism Non-interference in the internal affairs of states No regional military pacts, and ASEAN leadership in regional institutions

  17. Challenges for the Principles • ASEAN accept the US military dominance : an off-shore balancer for rising China • Open regionalism was challenged among the ASEAN and non-ASEAN members (EAS, ARF and APT) • Non interference principle is more difficult to assess (within and without ASEAN)

  18. Conclusion ASEAN’s leadership has evolved, expanded, and entered a new phase toward Asian regionalism • the origin regional grouping in Asia • a bridge as Indian and Pacific oceans • rich in resources human and natural for economic globalization • the institutional platform for wider Asia Pacific and East Asian regional institutions • the centre of Asian regionalist debates and interactions over changing norms and mechanisms

  19. Institutional Dilemma • ASEAN: a state-centric, sovereignty-bounded nations (Still struggling internal and external threats itself) • Seriously mismatch between traditional institution for grasping state sovereignty Vs transnational regionalism (APT, ARF, EAS) APT= ASEAN+3 (China+S.Korea+Japan) EAS= APT+3 (India+ Australia+ New Zealand)+Papua New Guinea +Russia ARF= EAS+ US+ Canada+ EU+N.Korea+Pakistan + Bangldesh +Sri Lanka+ Mongolia + East Timor

  20. Comment - Asian regionalism: a crucial element to survive for small nations facing large and powerful countries- soft institutionalism: gradually give way to bureaucratization and legalization, but only gradually and limitedly - continues to hold driver’s seat through regional cooperation to have greater international clout rather than singular national existence and efforts. State-centric nations Exclusive APT, ARF Inclusive EAS

  21. Thank you

More Related