1 / 27

Combinatorial Synthesis of Genetic Networks

Combinatorial Synthesis of Genetic Networks. Guet et. al. Andrew Goodrich Charles Feng. How Do Cells Repond?. Signal Transduction Network Proteins activate in a chain (phosphorylation) E.G. E. Coli swimming to aspartate. D. Bray, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 7 (2002).

brock
Download Presentation

Combinatorial Synthesis of Genetic Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Combinatorial Synthesis of Genetic Networks Guet et. al. Andrew Goodrich Charles Feng

  2. How Do Cells Repond? • Signal Transduction Network • Proteins activate in a chain (phosphorylation) • E.G. E. Coli swimming to aspartate D. Bray, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 7 (2002)

  3. How Do Cells Repond? • Transcription Network • Activates gene in DNA • Signal causes new proteins to be produced • Slower than transduction

  4. Shen-Orr et al. 2002

  5. Gene Introduction • Promoter—Controls production of protein • Structural Gene—Controls which protein is produced http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/42/Lac_operon.png

  6. Gene Introduction • Blunt Arrow—Repression • Pointy Arrow—Activation • E.G. If A high, then B low, C high, G low and steady state

  7. Combinatorial Synthesis • Very similar to directed evolution • Large number of different gene networks are created (called a library) • Library is then screened for desired feature • Process can then be iterated with new starting point

  8. Goal of Work • Create customized gene networks to implement different logic circuits • Input – Chemical concentration • Output – Fluorescent protein (GFP)

  9. Creating the Genes • 3 prokaryotic transcription regulator proteins • LacI • Modulated by isopropyl B-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) • TetR • Modulated by anhydrotetracycline (aTc) • λ cI

  10. Creating the Genes • 5 Promoter regions • 2 repressed by LacI (PL1 and PL2) • 1 repressed by TetR (PT) • 1 repressed by λ cI (Pλ-) • 1 activated by λ cI (Pλ+) • Gives a total of 15 possible genes

  11. Creating the Genes • Promoters and protein coding regions were combined to create functional genes • Sticky ends can be connected

  12. Creating the Plasmid • Plasmid – Circular DNA • Each has 3 of the created genes • Total of 125 different possible plasmids

  13. Creating the Plasmid • GFP gene included as an output signal • -lite – tagged for degradation • Reduce toxicity and over expression

  14. Experimental Procedure • Plasmids transformed into E. Coli • 2 strains of E.Coli, +/- wild type LacI • Each clone grown under 4 conditions • +/- IPTG, +/- aTc (regulator proteins) • GFP expression monitored over time • Identify “logical circuits”

  15. Results • Certain cells showed logical response • E.G. NIF, NAND, NOR, AND

  16. Results • Same connectivity, different logic

  17. Results • Only up to 2.5% or 7% of the cells responded • No set threshold

  18. Second Procedure • 30 clones of different logical behaviors were retransformed and sequenced • Following table is Lac- E.Coli host • Different logical circuits possible • Outputs not always full on or full off

  19. Second Results

  20. Second Results • Replacing one of the promotors can change the logic • E.G. Pλ+ to PT changes logic from ON to NIF or NAND • E.G. PL1 creates NOR

  21. Second Results • Also possible—Change promoter and connectivity, but logic stays the same

  22. Discussion • Can create many different logic circuits with these simple pieces • Offers an evolutionary shortcut—change network instead of single gene • Logic depends on both connectivity and promoters • Output not always predictable

  23. Discussion • Lac- red Line High aTchigh tetR High tetRlow λ cI Low λ cI high GFP BUT low GFP observed

  24. Discussion • Autoregulation difficult to predict • In this diagram, lac represses itself • Steady state enough to repress tet? • Boolean on/off model neglects intracellular effects and changes

  25. Discussion Elowitz and Leibler, 2000

  26. Future Possibilities • Biological Computers • Very far off, but groundwork showing • More complicated behaviors, including switches, sensors and oscillators • Combinatorial techniques applied to proteins instead of gene networks

  27. References • Guet et. al. Science. 296, 1466 (2002) 2. D. Bray, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 7 (2002) 3. Shenn-Orr et. al. 2002 4. Elowitz and Leibler, 2000

More Related