1 / 1

Iterated learning in populations

Iterated learning in populations. L earning and evolving expectations about linguistic heterogeneity. Kenny Smith, Bill Thompson. d. d. d. h. h. h. h. Iterated Bayesian learning Tool for testing link between learner biases and universals. Language universals

bunme
Download Presentation

Iterated learning in populations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Iterated learning in populations Learning and evolving expectations about linguistic heterogeneity Kenny Smith, Bill Thompson d d d h h h h Iterated Bayesian learning Tool for testing link between learner biases and universals Language universals Languages do not differ arbitrarily: certain properties recur across languages Two possibleexplanations Universals reflect biases of language learners? Universals result from other pressures inherent in language transmission and use? , sample from posterior How does stable distribution of languages reflect bias, P(h)? Results for Iterated Bayesian learning Single parent Griffiths & Kalish (2007) Convergence to the prior Distribution of languages reflects learner biases only Multiple parents Burkett & Griffiths (2010) If learners expect heterogeneous input: convergence to prior If learners expect homogeneous input: other factors influence stable distribution of languages Learning α Gamma prior over α, k=1 Learner learns distribution over languages and α(Gibbs sampler from Escobar & West, 1995) Evolving α Dual-transmission model Reproduction proportional to communicative accuracy Genes encode α, gamma-distributed mutations (shape = k, scale = θ) • Summary of results • High-α convergence to the prior in multiple-teacher model predicts wrong type of universal • There are regimes under which low α is favoured (selection for communication, learning with strong prior for low α) • Conclusions and implications • We expect the relationship between learner biases and language universals to be modulated by other factors • Initial conditions, bottleneck, population structure, language use, … • How can we disentangle these effects when inferring causes of universals? References Burkett, D., & Griffiths, T. L. (2010). Iterated learning of multiple languages from multiple teachers. In A. D. M. Smith, M.Schouwstra, B. de Boer, & K. Smith (Eds.), The Evolution of Language (pp. 58-65). Singapore: Word Scientific. Escobar, M. D., & West, M. (1995). Bayesian Density Estimation and Inference Using Mixtures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 577-588. Griffiths, T. L., & Kalish, M. L. (2007). Language evolution by iterated learning with Bayesian agents. Cognitive Science, 31, 441-480.

More Related