1 / 33

Califon Public School

Califon Public School. Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012. Assessments. Elementary Grades NJASK 3 NJASK 4 NJASK 5. Middle Grades NJASK 6 NJASK 7 NJASK 8. Assessment Analysis. By School By Sub-group By District Factor Group (DFG) By State.

bunny
Download Presentation

Califon Public School

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Califon Public School Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012

  2. Assessments Elementary Grades • NJASK 3 • NJASK 4 • NJASK 5 • Middle Grades • NJASK 6 • NJASK 7 • NJASK 8

  3. Assessment Analysis • By School • By Sub-group • By District Factor Group (DFG) • By State

  4. What is a District Factor Group?(DFG) • Percent of adults without a high school diploma • Percent of adults with some college education • Occupational status • Unemployment rate • Percent of individuals in poverty • Median family income

  5. Other ( I )District Factor Groups Bethlehem Township Franklin Township Clinton Town Lebanon Boro Clinton Township Lebanon Township East AmwellReadington Township

  6. NJASK Score Reporting • Performance Levels • Scale Score from 100-300 • Advanced Proficient: 250-300 • Proficient: 200-249 • Partially Proficient: 100-199

  7. NJ State Benchmarks for AYP • Benchmark values indicate % of Total Student Proficiency.

  8. NJASK 3 Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

  9. NJASK 3 Total Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern

  10. NJASK 3 LAL Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

  11. NJASK 3 Math Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

  12. NJASK 4 Proficient Advanced Proficient Partially Proficient

  13. NJASK 4 Proficient Advanced Proficient Partially Proficient

  14. NJASK 4 Total Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern

  15. NJASK 4 LAL Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

  16. NJASK 4 Math Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

  17. NJASK 4 Science Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

  18. NJASK 5 Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

  19. NJASK 5 Total Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern

  20. NJASK 5 LAL Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

  21. NJASK 5 Math Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

  22. NJASK 6 Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

  23. NJASK 6 Total Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern

  24. NJASK 6 LAL Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

  25. NJASK 7 Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

  26. NJASK 7Total Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern

  27. NJASK 7 Math Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

  28. NJASK 8 Proficient Advanced Proficient Partially Proficient

  29. NJASK 8 Math Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

  30. NJASK 8 Science Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

  31. Action Plan for 2012-2013 (K-8) • Writing Program: Units of Study based on Lucy Caulkin’sWriter’s Workshop Framework; monitor implementation of program and provide additional professional development on teaching writing • Project READERS:Response to Effective Assessment-Driven Early Reading Support • Use data to guide instruction and intervention decisions for students with reading difficulties • Plan for and implement evidence-based instructional strategies and interventions that are response to students’ needs • (Partnership with Lehigh University) • LinkIt!: Linking state, district and classroom assessments • Progress monitoring • Benchmarking • Instructional Grouping & Differential Instruction • Test Creation

  32. ESEA Waiver Annual Progress Targets As approved in New Jersey’s Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Waiver Application, the New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) is transitioning to a new accountability system that provides a more accurate analysis of student achievement. One component of this system is the calculation of Annual Progress Targets, which are indicators to measure schools’ progress toward meeting the State proficiency benchmark of 90%.

  33. ESEA WaiverPreliminary School Profiles 2012 • Participation and performance determinations for Califon School under New Jersey’s Elementary and Secondary Act Waiver • Met Goal = Met Performance Goal of 90% • Yes = Met Progress Target or Participation Rate • Yes* = Met Progress Target (Confidence Interval Applied) • No = Missed Progress Target or Participation Rate

More Related