1 / 59

ISTANBUL-06

ISTANBUL-06. GCM calculations based on covariant density functional theory. Saclay, April 9, 2008. Peter Ring. Technical University Munich. Colaborators:. E. Lopes (BMW) T. Niksic (Zagreb) R. Rossignoli (La Plata) J. Sheikh (Kashmir) D. Vretenar (Zagreb)

Download Presentation

ISTANBUL-06

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ISTANBUL-06 GCM calculations based oncovariant density functional theory Saclay, April 9, 2008 Peter Ring Technical University Munich Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  2. Colaborators: E. Lopes (BMW) T. Niksic (Zagreb) R. Rossignoli (La Plata) J. Sheikh (Kashmir) D. Vretenar (Zagreb) E. Litvinova (GSI) V. Tselaev (St. Petersburg) Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  3. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  4. GCM calculations Microscopic description of quantum phase transitions Content Relativistic density functional theory Variation after projection Particle vibrational coupling Conclusions Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  5. Rho-meson: isovector field Omega-meson: short-range repulsive Sigma-meson: attractive scalar field Covariant density functional theory The nuclear fields are obtained by coupling the nucleons through theexchange of effective mesons through an effective Lagrangian. (J,T)=(0+,0) (J,T)=(1-,0) (J,T)=(1-,1) Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  6. Three relativistic models: Density dependence Meson exchange with non-linear meson couplings: Boguta and Bodmer, NPA. 431, 3408 (1977) Lalazissis, Koenig, Ring, PRC 55. 540 (1997) NL1,NL3,TM1,.. Meson exchange with density dependent coupling constants: R.Brockmann and H.Toki, PRL68, 3408 (1992) Lalazissis, Niksic, Vretenar, Ring, PRC 71, 024312 (2005) g(ρ) DD-ME1,DD-ME2 8 parameters Point-coupling models with density dependent coupling constants: Manakos and Mannel, Z.Phys.330, 223 (1988) Buervenich, Madland, Maruhn, Reinhard, PRC 65, 44308 (2002 G(ρ) PC-F1,…. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  7. Parameterization of denstiy dependence parameterization saturation density MICROSCOPIC: Dirac-Bruecknercalculations g(r) PHENOMENOLOGICAL: g(r) g(r) 4 parameters for density dependence Typel and Wolter, NPA656, 331 (1999) Niksic, Vretenar, Finelli, Ring, PRC66, 024306 (2002) Lalazissis, Niksic, Vretenar, Ring, PRC 71, 024312 (05) Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  8. finite range forces → point-coupling models meson propagator in momentum space: mσ= 500 MeV all fits to radii→ mσ=800 MeV Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  9. Point-Coupling Models Point-coupling model σ ω δ ρ J=1, T=1 J=0, T=1 J=1, T=0 J=0, T=0 Manakos and Mannel, Z.Phys.330, 223 (1988) Bürvenich, Madland, Maruhn, Reinhard, PRC 65, 044308 (2002) Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  10. Lagrangian density for point coupling tree-body and four-body forces lead to density dependent coupling constants: PC-F1 Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  11. g2 g3 aρ How many parameters ? 7 parameters number of param. symmetric nuclear matter: E/A, ρ0 finite nuclei (N=Z): E/A,radii spinorbit for free Coulomb (N≠Z): a4 K∞ density dependence: T=0 T=1 rn - rp Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  12. rms-deviations: masses: Dm = 900 keV radii: Dr = 0.015 fm Masses: 900 keV Lalazissis, Niksic, Vretenar, Ring, PRC 71, 024312 (2005) Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  13. Pb: GMR/GDR DD-ME2 G.A. Lalazissis et al, PRC 71, 024312 (2005) Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  14. Isoscalar Giant Monopole in Sn-isotopes GMR in Sn Isoscalar GMR in spherical nuclei →nuclear matter compression modulus Knm. Sn isotopes: DD-ME2 / Gogny pairing Theory: Lalazissis et al Exp: U. Garg, unpublished Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  15. U. Garg: Monopole-resonance and compressibility c ≈ -1 Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  16. Symmetric nuclear matter: point coupling model is fitted to DD-ME2 Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  17. fit to nuclear matter fit to finite nuclei Dσ[fm4] t [fm] as [MeV] t [fm] as [MeV] -0.76 2.125 15.32 -0.78 2.157 15.57 -0.80 2.189 15.82 set B 2.015 17.925 -0.82 2.221 16.06 set C 2.069 17.856 -0.84 2.254 16.29 set D 2.126 17.780 -0.86 2.286 16.52 set E 2.184 17.717 ----------------------------------- DD-ME2 2.108 17.72 ==================== fitted Dσ= 0.8342 set F (Knm=251 MeV) fitted in addition to GMR set G (Knm=230 MeV) Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  18. symmetry energy: Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  19. IVGMR in finite nuclei: Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  20. Conclusions 1 ------- Point coupling is not equivalent to finite range: Point coupling has different surface properties: - smaller surface energy - larger surface thickness - larger surface incompressibility Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  21. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  22. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  23. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  24. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  25. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  26. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  27. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  28. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  29. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  30. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  31. 32S:GCM: N+J projection vs. J-projection S-32 surface Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  32. Superdef. Band in 32S: S-32 BE2 Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  33. 32S: J+N projection: RMF-SLy4-Exp S-32 BE2 Bender, Flocard, Heenen, PRC 68, 44312 (2003) Niksic, Vretenar, Ring, PRC 74, 064309 (2006) Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  34. 32S: GCM, J-projection RMF-Gogny S-32 BE2 Egido et al, PRC 62, 05308 (2000) Niksic, Vretenar, Ring, PRC 74, 064309 (2006) Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  35. 36Ar:GCM: N+J projection vs. J-projection Ar-36 surface Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  36. Ar-32 wavefunctions GCM-wavefunctions Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  37. Conclusions: Superdef. Band in 36Ar: Ar-36 BE2 Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  38. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  39. Spectra in 24Mg Mg-24 spectrum Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  40. Spectra in 24Mg Mg-24 spectrum Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  41. X(5) 152Sm Quantum phase transitions and critical symmetries Interacting Boson Model Casten Triangle E(5): F. Iachello, PRL 85, 3580 (2000) X(5): F. Iachello, PRL 87, 52502 (2001) R.F. Casten, V. Zamfir, PRL 85 3584, (2000) Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  42. Transition U(5) → SU(3) in Ne-isotopes R. Krücken et al, PRL 88, 232501 (2002) R = BE2(J→J-2) / BE2(2→0) Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  43. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  44. R. Krücken et al, PRL 88, 232501 (2002) Niksic et al PRL 99, 92502 (2007) F. Iachello, PRL 87, 52502 (2001) GCM: only one scale parameter: E(21) X(5): two scale parameters: E(21), BE2(02→21) Problem in present GCM: restricted to γ=0 Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  45. Neighboring nuclei: Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  46. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  47. Projected Density Functionals and VAP: J.Sheikh and P. R., NPA 665 (2000) 71 Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  48. Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  49. J.Sheikh et al. PRC 66, 044318 (2002) Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

  50. Halo-formation in Ne-isotopes pairing energies binding energies rms-radii L. Lopes, PhD Thesis, TUM, 2002 Cross-fertilization between Shell-Model and Energy Denstiy Functional methods

More Related