1 / 27

Beware Publishers Bearing Gifts Why the ‘Big Deal’ is a Bad Deal for Universities

Beware Publishers Bearing Gifts Why the ‘Big Deal’ is a Bad Deal for Universities. DAVID BALL Bournemouth University (Chair, Procurement for Libraries) dball@bournemouth.ac.uk. Summary. Value chain Creation, publication, aggregation, access, use Where the money goes

camilla
Download Presentation

Beware Publishers Bearing Gifts Why the ‘Big Deal’ is a Bad Deal for Universities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Beware Publishers Bearing GiftsWhy the ‘Big Deal’ is a Bad Deal for Universities DAVID BALL Bournemouth University (Chair, Procurement for Libraries) dball@bournemouth.ac.uk

  2. Summary • Value chain • Creation, publication, aggregation, access, use • Where the money goes • Economics of electronic publishing • The Big Deal - advantages, dangers • A way forward? Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  3. Acknowledgement Business Models for Distribution, Archiving and Use of Electronic Information: Towards a Value Chain Perspective: A Study for ECUP+ Mark Bide, 1998 Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  4. The Value Chain: Concepts • Authority • Branding • Monopoly • Product-to-service shift Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  5. The Value Chain: Creation • Author or compiler • Employed by publishers or independent agents • Creator confers authority • Author as monopolist Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  6. The Value Chain: Publication • Selection and editing of information into consumable form • Authority - from imprint e.g. OUP • from brand/title e.g. British Medical Journal • Monopoly transferred from creator Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  7. The Value Chain: Publication - electronic • Authority diluted? • Physical realisation deferred to end of chain - at point of use • Libraries buy access - a service not a product Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  8. The Value Chain: Aggregation • Bringing together in a coherent collection disparate information sources • Libraries confer authority by virtue of selection • Libraries are in control of budgets by selecting individual titles • Traditional near monopoly for libraries Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  9. The Value Chain: Aggregation - electronic • No physical product • Aggregation role moves elsewhere - to publisher or intermediary • Library monopoly lost Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  10. The Value Chain: Access • Core library activity • Near monopoly for printed • Authority Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  11. The Value Chain: Access - electronic • Library monopoly lost - network connectivity • Authority of intellectual access/ organisation Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  12. The Value Chain: Use • Even with printed materials a service not a product • Measuring usage • Measuring value for money Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  13. The Value Chain: Use - electronic • First physical realisation • Accurate measurement of usage • Value for money? Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  14. Where Does the Money Go? • Popular fiction – to the author • Academic works – to the publisher • S&P Top 500 (1997) • Reed/Elsevier 27th highest net profit margin • Wolters/Kluwer 18th highest return on equity Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  15. Why Are Academic Publishers Rewarded? • Not for dissemination • Easy electronic alternatives • Intermediaries very poorly rewarded • Serials agents’ margin 6-7% • For validation • Creating the scholarly record • Peer review, quality assurance Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  16. Distorting Factors • High indirect rewards of publication – for academics; for institutions • Academic sector has vested interest in commercial scholarly publishing • No direct payment by user – price does not affect demand • Academics never place a value on publication or use • Result – unchecked inflation Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  17. The Power of Consortia? • Most effective when there is competition – booksellers/serials agents • 7 UK HE regional consortia • Books/serials contracts over $100m p.a. • Large discounts on books • High-quality service + innovations • Diminished by: monopoly suppliers, looking-glass economics, product-to-service shift Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  18. Looking-Glass Economics of the Must-Have Journal • Hard-copy price cut by 50% • Some 2nd copies sold • Some new subscribers • But not 100% more • Generally libraries will spend savings on other journals • Result: lost profitability, decreased market share Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  19. Looking-Glass Economics of the Must-Have Journal/2 • Hard-copy price is doubled • Some subscriptions lost • But not 50% - a must-have title • Other titles will be cut • Result: increased profitability, increased market share Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  20. The Must-Have Publisher • Same logic holds for e-journals • It does not make commercial sense for publishers to discount to consortia • Hence additional content instead of lower prices – the Big Deal • Hence must-have publishers Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  21. Product-to-Service Shift • Hard-copy content is unchanging, for all, for ever • Access to e-content is: • Time-limited • Archival rights? • Content changes? • Restricted access rights Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  22. The Big Deal - What is it? • Access to all of a publisher’s current titles, with some back-files • 3-5 year licence • Based on previous print subscriptions? • Annual inflation increases • No-cancellation clauses? Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  23. The Big Deal - Advantages • Users - get more content • Libraries - predict inflation; save on document delivery budgets • Publishers - stable income Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  24. The Big Deal - More Content? • Sweet-shop syndrome • North Carolina Science Direct statistics: • 28% of titles = 75% of downloads • 34% of titles have 5 downloads or less • 57% of titles - 40% of usage in 1 month • Emerald study (Ingenta Institute): • 47% of users view 1 title of 118 • 40% of users view 2-5 titles • 44% of subscribers view 1 subject (of 10) Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  25. The Big Deal - Dangers • Death of collection management? • Subscription decisions at publisher level • Can we not subscribe? • Non-big deal subscriptions suffer • Higher impact factors because of availability - undermine other journals • Publisher’s monopoly is intensified; national big deals exacerbate further Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  26. A Way Forward? • Specify what you want, determine your budget/price, then go to market • Need strength of a consortium • Consultation, specification, tender, contract management • Retain budgetary control by selection • Create favourable business models • Support alternative publishing Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

  27. The Little Porridge Pot • A good servant but a bad master • The lesson is to retain control, not to let our servants control us Beware Publishers IATUL 2003

More Related