1 / 12

Peer-assisted Learning in Research Methods

Peer-assisted Learning in Research Methods. Anna Stone Claire Meade Hazel Madziva. Background. Level 3 students wanting work experience to enhance employability. Level 1 students wanting additional tutorials to enhance understanding of basic concepts. Why PAL Support?.

candid
Download Presentation

Peer-assisted Learning in Research Methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Peer-assisted Learning in Research Methods Anna Stone Claire Meade Hazel Madziva

  2. Background Level 3 students wanting work experience to enhance employability Level 1 students wanting additional tutorials to enhance understanding of basic concepts

  3. Why PAL Support? • Peer-assisted learning has been demonstrably successful (Dreyfus, 2002) • Shown to enhance student engagement and outcomes (Hurley, McKay, Scott, & James, 2003). • although the efficacy of small-group learning remains open to question, (Colvin & Ashman, 2010) • there is also consensus as to its potential, dependent upon a number of factors (Cohen, 1994; Lyle & Robinson, 2003;).

  4. Why PAL Support? • Peer experience • Peer communication (see Witt, Wheeless, & Allen, 2004). • Peer models (Bandura, 2007) • Facilitator development (Maheady 1998; Topping, 2005 )

  5. Preparation • Five Level 3 students and one M-level were recruited • Short application form • Informal interview • One-day training focused on small group processes and dealing with difficult situations • Level 1 students invited to sign up for two PAL sessions • Choice of 6 topics • 120 students signed up (many for all 6 topics) • Maximum group size of 12 • 22 sessions were planned (a major exercise) • Materials were written for training and session-facilitation, including small group exercises

  6. Running the sessions • Some teaching staff volunteered to run sessions (excess of demand over supply) • Topics were: • SPSS • Statistical significance • Validity • Correlation • Chi-square • Writing a lab report • Always a member of the PAL admin team on stand-by as back-up (never called out)

  7. Results – PAL learners 85% of the Level 1 students gave feedback: marks out of 5: 75% very much 60% a lot Suggests that students still felt uncertain about their understanding and would like more sessions

  8. Results – PAL facilitators • Feedback from session report forms and wrap-up session (lunch and certificates) • All facilitators felt their experience had been positive and useful • Specific benefits: • Successfully managing situations • Increased confidence • Improved interpersonal, communication and leadership skills

  9. Wrap-up session • How to apply the experience to job applications and interviews • Identifying and describing transferable skills acquired from study of research methods in a scientific context • critical thinking • analytical skills • handling information • Drawing on the PAL experience generally

  10. Considerations • Low attendance – only 1/3 of sign-ups • Sign-up process didn’t foster commitment • Topics directly related to coursework assessments were better attended (not what they asked for!) • Sessions were better attended before the coursework deadlines • Not enough Level 3 student PAL facilitators • Recruitment approach and application process possible factors here

  11. Planned improvements • Integrate PAL sessions into the planning of the module • Scoping for analysis of both the student experience and assessment impact • Potential Employability partnership development at Level 3

  12. Conclusions • A worthwhile intervention • Administration and delivery processes should not be underestimated • Integrated / tailor recruitment needed • To maximise success PALS clearly needs to be a mutual development experience

More Related