1 / 19

Creating “authorised” teachers: the leadership of CPD in a self-improving school system.

Creating “authorised” teachers: the leadership of CPD in a self-improving school system. Nick Sorensen Bath Spa University n.sorensen@bathspa.ac.uk. Three aims. Reconceptualising the advanced practitioner as the “authorised” teacher The “authorised” teacher in context

carriet
Download Presentation

Creating “authorised” teachers: the leadership of CPD in a self-improving school system.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Creating “authorised” teachers: the leadership of CPD in a self-improving school system. Nick SorensenBath Spa Universityn.sorensen@bathspa.ac.uk

  2. Three aims • Reconceptualising the advanced practitioner as the “authorised” teacher • The “authorised” teacher in context • Professional development in a self-improving school system.

  3. My position • Relationship between practice and policy • Teaching as a complex activity • Growth mindsets: “consistently good and continually improving” • Teacher development as a long term process • Primacy of relationship between teacher and learner

  4. My research focus • What does it mean to be an advanced practitioner? A redefinition of ‘good’ or ‘best’ practice. • What is the relationship between advanced practice and improvisation? • Understanding sustainable teacher development.

  5. Problem of experienced and expert practitioners • “when we go about the spontaneous, intuitive performance of the actions of everyday life, we show ourselves to be knowledgeable in a special way. Often we cannot say what we know” Schon (1983) cited in Berliner (1986)

  6. Improvisation and advanced practice Professional practice as “ a highly specific process but one that has similarities with others involving the performance of complex and diverse skills in real time and in contexts that are unpredictable and constantly evolving” Atkinson, T and Claxton, G (2000) The Intuitive Practitioner Buckingham: Open University Press

  7. Redefining ‘good practice’ Conclusion: “ a vibrant democracy needs an open-ended approach to ‘good practice’, which remains within the control of reflexive and learning professionals, which remains sensitive to constantly changing local contexts, and which provides resources to deal appropriately with the complexities involved in its identification and dissemination.” Coffield and Edward (2009)

  8. The “authorised” teacher Reconceptualising ‘good’ or ‘best’ practice • Authenticity • Authorisation • Authoring

  9. A view of advanced practice Notions of advanced practice are, of necessity, jointly constructed as part of emergent, creative responses to the everyday, complex reality that teachers are engaged with. (Coombs & Sorensen 2010)

  10. Contextualising the ‘authorised’ teacher • Action research movement (Stenhouse 1975) • The Expert Pedagogue (Berliner 1986) • Authentic leadership • Coaching • Masters level PPD – facilitating professional critical reflection • Federations – sharing good practice (school improvement movement)

  11. A golden age of teacher professionalism? Hargreaves + Fullan (2000) Four phases. • The pre-professional age (1870 -) • The age of the autonomous professional (1960s -) • The collegial professional (post NC) • The fourth age

  12. The White Paper • “devolving power to the front line” p3 • “decisive action to free our teachers from constraint and improve their professional status and autonomy” p8 • “features of the strongest educational systems combine autonomy and accountability” p 51 • “our aim should be to support the school system to be effectively self-improving” p13

  13. Creating a self improving school systemHargreaves, D.H. (2010) • Clusters of schools (structure) • Local solutions approach and Co-construction (two cultural elements) • Systems leaders (the key people)

  14. Systems leaders • Introduced by Michael Fullan (2005) • A value: a conviction to strive for success of all schools and all students • A disposition to action: a commitment to work with others • A frame of reference: role of servant leader for the greater benefit of the education system

  15. Implications • Teaching and leading go hand in hand (Barrington et al 2010) Self evaluative practices build leadership skills • System leadership distributed at all levels • Spending time in schools other than their own (learning walks)

  16. Chickens and eggs Which comes first? • School improvement • CPD Should school improvement drive CPD or vice – versa?

  17. Features of an autonomous education system • Leadership of CPD distributed (within schools and across networks) • Action research and enquiry into learner-centred practices to drive school improvement initiatives • Learning walks – experiencing and evaluating other schools approaches • Dissemination of evidences (accreditation?)

  18. Conclusions • White Paper offers opportunity for reclaiming professionalism • Essential to ensure that CPD is recognised as a pro-active driver of school improvement • Role for HEIs / external agencies – “third space”

  19. Creating “authorised” teachersA theoretical model - Sorensen (2010)

More Related