1 / 21

PROGRESS TOWARDS AN OPEN MIDPLANE SEPARATION DIPOLE

PROGRESS TOWARDS AN OPEN MIDPLANE SEPARATION DIPOLE. P. Wanderer, BNL with R. Gupta, A. Ghosh, N. Mokhov HHH-AMT 12 November 2004. LARP at BNL. Magnet activity – look at open midplane dipole for LHC IR upgrade with “dipole first” optics and block coils Other activities –

cassia
Download Presentation

PROGRESS TOWARDS AN OPEN MIDPLANE SEPARATION DIPOLE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PROGRESS TOWARDS AN OPEN MIDPLANE SEPARATION DIPOLE P. Wanderer, BNL with R. Gupta, A. Ghosh, N. Mokhov HHH-AMT 12 November 2004

  2. LARP at BNL • Magnet activity – look at open midplane dipole for LHC IR upgrade with “dipole first” optics and block coils • Other activities – • Beam instrumentation for present LHC • Accelerator physics • Superconductor development • Superconductor, magnet testing for other US labs working on LARP

  3. Interaction Region Upgrade Quad or Dipole first? Single bore or twin bore? Large crossing angles with superbunches or crab cavities? Long range (parasitic Beam-Beam collisions?

  4. D1 parameters for this IR • Bdl = 15T x 10m  Nb3Sn • If block coils  R&W or W&R coils • Coil apertures studied: 84, 160, 120 mm • Field quality – typical δB/B ~10-4 • Magnet & cryo system tolerant of beam heating 9 kW (4.5K)  fully open midplane + absorber at temperature >> 4.5K

  5. Some design challenges • Any “dipole-first” D1: large forces, stored energy, radiation heating • Open midplane, block coils • less efficient than cosθ coils • Good field quality harder to achieve • Weak vertical support of coil

  6. Issues for R&D program • Goal: design, build, test proof-of-principal model • LARP main effort is IR quadrupole  limited resources

  7. POP design phase – June 04 • Design for 10m dipole-first D1 • June, 2004 LARP review • Achieved 10-4 FQ, reasonable strain on conductor =>”proof of principal” design • Complex coil • ~ 50% of radiation deposited in cold mass • coil aperture 160 mm • ~ 1m yoke OD => $$$ to build • 10m length => $$$ to build • Needed resources inconsistent with LARP’s focus on quad

  8. Navigation of Lorentz Forces (1)A new and major consideration in design optimization Vertical Component of the Lorentz Force Density Vertical Lorentz force density in certain designs ~Zero vertical Lorentz force density line Since there is no downward force on the lower block (there is slight upward force), we do not need much support below it, if the structure is segmented. The support structure can be designed to deal with the downward force on the upper block using the space between the upper and the lower blocks. • This allows the lower block to move closer to midplane to improve field quality. Dipole Design Status, Ramesh Gupta, BNL

  9. Vertical force comes from the horizontal component of the field : Ly = Jz X Bx. “Block A” with height more than that of “Block B” straightens field lines that reduce Bx and the downward force on “Block B” by ~50%. A B Navigation of Lorentz Forces (2)(Transferring vertical forces between blocks) Design with 50 mm midplane gap: Blocks must be strategically segmented to minimize maximum stress build-up, navigate Lorentz forces, minimize peak fields and optimize field quality. The task is to demonstrate that it is possible to satisfy all of the above requirements at the same time. Note: There is a plenty of space for support structure below “Block A” Moving Block A upward also minimizes the secondary energy deposition from target. Dipole Design Status, Ramesh Gupta, BNL

  10. Power (mW/g) at L = 5m, 10m N. Mokhov – LARP Napa Oct 04

  11. Design Progress – October 04 • Relax design parameters: • Horizontal aperture 120 mm • Field quality – δB/B ~10-3 • Separate D1 into two magnets, D1a, D1b • D1a: ~84mm aperture, develop fully under LARP • D1b: develop only proof-of-principal design • More details on next slide

  12. Starting Point and some estimates on D1A Parameters (to be iterated) Design Goal: An open Midplane design with large horizontal and small vertical aperture that includes a warm absorber inside the cold-mass to avoid a major upgrade in CERN cryogenic facility and to remove ~9KW at an affordable cost. D1A (to be developed under LARP): Horizontal Aperture : ~70 mm Magnet Length : ~ 5 meter Quench Field : 15+T Yoke outer radius: ~400 mm (or a rectangular yoke with smaller vertical size?) A preliminary design presented at Port Jeff in 9/2003 D1B (NOT to be developed under LARP): Horizontal Aperture : ~140 mm Magnet Length : ~ 5 meter Quench Field : ~13T Yoke outer radius: ~600 mm Note: D1B may have similar Lorentz forces as D1A

  13. Overall Parameters of the Reduced Aperture Open Midplane Dipole Preliminary Design • Outer Yoke Radius : 600 mm to 700 mm (old value 1 meter) • Horizontal Coil Spacing : 120 mm (old value 160 mm) • Vertical Coil Spacing : 30 mm (old value 50 mm) • Field errors: 2.10-3, projected to be 5.10-4 with more optimization at +/- 50 mm • (old value 5.10-5 at +/- 36 mm) • Quench Field: ~14.5 T (old value ~15 T) • Conductor requirements: ~60% of previous design The above magnet is much smaller than before. However, it still has a significant size. Dipole for LHC IR Upgrade - Ramesh Gupta

  14. A Lower Cost Open Midplane Dipole Proposal • At present, the aperture of D1 is determined by the requirements at the far end of IP. • We propose dividing each D1 in two dipoles D1A and D1B. We also propose to develop only D1A under LARP. • D1A will be shorter and will have lower aperture. • One can also consider raising field in D1A and reducing in D1B. This will balance Lorentz forces better between D1A (higher field, lower aperture) and D1B (lower field, larger aperture). Beam Trajectory Dipole for LHC IR Upgrade - Ramesh Gupta

  15. A Proposal to Build D1A Under LARP A lower aperture, lower length, lower cost, open midplane racetrack coil dipole that while developing and proving the basic technology, also gets used in LHC IR upgrade * Coil aperture * (half length magnet) Coil aperture (full length magnet) Beam Trajectory Good field aperture Good field aperture Consider increasing the field in the first D1 (D1A), and also consider using HTS there. HTS has a potential to generate higher fields and can tolerate higher heat loads, as well. Dipole for LHC IR Upgrade - Ramesh Gupta

  16. A Similar Layout Was Considered for VLHC Beam optics reasons were different, but magnet design reasons were partly similar. • First Magnet (D1A): • Higher field, lower aperture, taking help of HTS. • Second Magnet (D1B): • Lower field, larger aperture, based entirely on Nb3Sn. Given the time frame of LHC IR Upgrade, we would consider HTS. However, we won’t make the design contingent on that. Dipole for LHC IR Upgrade - Ramesh Gupta

  17. Hardware Progress – October 04 • Better understanding of conductor – flux jumps, RRR • New winding machine for reacted Nb3Sn • Successful test of ten-turn, common coil dipole (DCC016) • Plan to use LBL subcoils (L ~ 30 cm) • Use BNL ten-turn fixtures, with spacers, to assemble subcoils

  18. Technology Development TestsSub-scale Coils in Open Midplane Structure • Short coils made and pre-tested for other applications can be used in an open midplane configuration to examine the basic technological issues. (BNL/LBL collaboration). • The support structure for this open midplane dipole test will be designed such that it: • Produces similar deflections (after the 1st test with ~zero deflection) • Allows variation in pre-stress • Allows variation in vertical separation • Max. stress in actual magnet: • Horizontal = 150-200 MPa • Vertical = 90-100 MPa Dipole Design Status, Ramesh Gupta, BNL

  19. Looking ahead - 1 • Assemble subcoils for test of open midplane concept. (Assemble and test in ~ a year?) • Plan intermediate steps • Experiments with magnets, especially preload • Minimum & maximum preload • Model magnet features

  20. Looking ahead - 2 • Determine parameters for D1a + D1b • Aperture, length, field quality  accelerator physics • Radiation heating  LHC cryo ops, heating calculations • Design, build, test proof-of-principle model This program will be reviewed in mid-December

More Related