1 / 32

The Magnetorotational Instability

The Magnetorotational Instability. 16 October 2004 Large Scale Computation in Astrophysics John F. Hawley University of Virginia. Jean-Pierre De Villiers (UVa; U. Calgary) Steven A. Balbus (UVa) Julian H. Krolik, Shigenobu Hirose (JHU) Charles F. Gammie (Illinois). Collaborators:.

cato
Download Presentation

The Magnetorotational Instability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Magnetorotational Instability 16 October 2004 Large Scale Computation in Astrophysics John F. Hawley University of Virginia

  2. Jean-Pierre De Villiers (UVa; U. Calgary) Steven A. Balbus (UVa) Julian H. Krolik, Shigenobu Hirose (JHU) Charles F. Gammie (Illinois) Collaborators:

  3. Outline • About the MRI • Simulations – local disk MRI studies • Simulations – global Kerr black hole accretion and jet formation

  4. The Accretion Context Volumetric rendering of density in 3D accretion disk simulation Artist’s conception of a black hole binary with accretion disk

  5. The MRI is important in accretion disks because they are locally hydrodynamically stable by the Rayleigh criterion, dL/dR > 0, but are MHD unstable when dW2/dR < 0 The MHD instability is: Local Linear Independent of field strength and orientation The Magnetorotational Instability The measure of the importance of a magnetic field is not determined solely by the value of b

  6. Magnetorotational Instability • Stability requirement is • One can always find a small enough wavenumber k so there will be an instability unless

  7. MRI maximum growth • Maximum unstable growth rate: • Maximum rate occurs for wavenumbers • For Keplerian profiles maximum growth rate and wavelengths:

  8. Disks and Stars • Disks – supported by rotation • Stars – supported by pressure • Disks – Entropy gradients generally perpendicular to angular velocity gradients • Stars – BV frequency larger than rotational frequency • Disks – solid body rotation not possible • Stars – solid body rotation possible

  9. Hoiland Criteria

  10. Regions of Instability: Generalized Hoiland criteria, Keplerian profile W

  11. Numerical Simulations of the MRI: Local and Global • Local “Shearing boxes” • Cylindrical disks (semi-global) • Axisymmetric global • Full 3D global simulations – Newtonian, pseudo-Newtonian • Global simulations in Kerr metric

  12. MRI in a shearing box • MRI produces turbulence • Maxwell stress proportional to Pmag • Maxwell stress dominates over Reynolds • Field b value 10-100 • Toroidal field dominates Angular Velocity perturbations In a shearing box

  13. Stress as a function of rotation profile Hawley, Balbus, Winters 1999 Solid body Rayleigh unstable Keplerian

  14. Summary: Turbulence in Disks – Local Simulations • Turbulence and transport are the inevitable consequence of differential rotation and magnetism • Hydrodynamic (i.e. non MHD) disk turbulence is not sustained: it has no way to tap locally the free energy of differential rotation • The MRI is an effective dynamo • The flow is turbulent not viscous. Turbulence is a property of the flow; viscosity is a property of the fluid. A high Reynolds number turbulent flow does not resemble a low Reynolds number viscous flow

  15. The Global Picture

  16. General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics Codes • Wilson (1975) • Koide et al. (2000) • Gammie, McKinney & Toth (2003) • Komissarov (2004) • De Villiers & Hawley (2003)

  17. GRMHD implementation • Fixed Kerr Metric in spherical Boyer Lindquist coordinates • Graded radial mesh - inner boundary just outside horizon; q zones concentrated at equator • Induction equation of form • Fab,c + Fbc,a + Fca,b = 0 • Baryon Conservation, stress-energy conservation, entropy conservation (internal energy); no cooling • First order, time-explicit, operator split finite differencing • Similar to ZEUS code

  18. References: De Villiers & Hawley 2003, ApJ, 589, 458 De Villiers, Hawley & Krolik 2003, ApJ, 599, 1238 Hirose, Krolik, De Villiers, & Hawley 2004, ApJ, 606, 1083 De Villiers, Hawley, Krolik, & Hirose, astroph-0407092 Krolik, Hawley, & Hirose, astroph-0409231

  19. Initial Torus (density) Initial poloidal field loops b = 100 Outer boundary 120M Ensemble of black hole spins: a/M = 0, 0.5, 0.9, 0.998 r = 25 M

  20. Global Disk Simulation

  21. Accretion flow structures

  22. Field in main disk • Field is tangled; toroidal component dominates • Field is sub-equipartion; b > 1 • Field is correlated to provide stress

  23. Properties of Accretion Disk • Accretion disk angular momentum distribution near Keplerian • Disk is MHD turbulent due to the MRI • Maxwell stress drives accretion. Average stress values 0.1 to 0.01 thermal pressure. Toroidal fields dominate, stress ~ ½ magnetic pressure • Large scale fluctuations and low-m spiral features • Low-spin models have come into approximate steady state • Relative accretion rate drops as a function of increasing black hole spin

  24. What about Jets? A combination of Rotation, Accretion, Magnetic Field • Young stellar objects – accreting young star • X-ray binaries – accreting NS or BH • Symbiotic stars – accreting WD • Supersoft X-ray sources – accreting WD • Pulsars – rotating NS • AGN – accreting supermassive BH • Gamma ray burst systems

  25. Funnel Properties • Funnel is evacuated • Poloidal radial field created by ejection of field from plunging inflow into funnel • Field in pressure equilibrium with corona • Toroidal field can be generated by black hole spin – outgoing Poynting flux • Unbound mass outflow at funnel wall

  26. Origin of funnel field • Magnetic field is ejected into the centrifugally-evacuated funnel • Spin of the black hole creates outgoing EM energy Radial magnetic field energy density

  27. Poynting Flux for Different Black Hole Spins

  28. Jet Luminosity

  29. Funnel and jets: a summary • Outflow throughout funnel, but only at funnel wall is there significant mass flux • Outgoing velocity ~0.4 - 0.6 c in mass flux • Poynting flux dominates in funnel • Jet luminosity increases with hole spin • Fraction of jet luminosity in Poynting flux increases with spin • Both pressure and Lorentz forces important for acceleration

  30. Conclusions • Magnetic field fundamentally alters stability properties of rotating fluid – Hoiland criteria replaced • MRI effective in generating turbulence, amplifying field (dynamo), transporting angular momentum • Centrifugal effects create evacuated funnel • Magnetic fields can launch jets and other outflows • Rotation of black hole can power jets and affect disk

More Related