1 / 7

Multi-annual evaluation plan

Multi-annual evaluation plan. Evaluation Working Group 16.11.2007 Daniel Jansen & Benno Savioli Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs, Northrhine - Westfalia FEEDBACK – Benno Savioli, Bremen. Formal status of the „evaluation plan“: a recommendation, not a requirement.

causeyj
Download Presentation

Multi-annual evaluation plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Multi-annual evaluation plan Evaluation Working Group 16.11.2007 Daniel Jansen & Benno SavioliMinistry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs, Northrhine - Westfalia FEEDBACK – Benno Savioli, Bremen Daniel.Jansen@mags.nrw.de / savioli@feedback-bremen.de

  2. Formal status of the „evaluation plan“: a recommendation, not a requirement Competing Purposes Publicity / Partnership Committment towards the European Commission and economic and social partners Technical implementation Optimising the management and use of evaluations Daniel.Jansen@mags.nrw.de / savioli@feedback-bremen.de

  3. Procedural Guidance Manual for Evaluation of NSRF Operational Programmes in Romania, 2007-2013 • Technical advise for evaluation planning • 1:1 adoption of the COM recommendation in working document No.5 on ongoing evaluation • Problem: not all recommendations of the COM correspond to the needs for an efficient program management Daniel.Jansen@mags.nrw.de / savioli@feedback-bremen.de

  4. First results of the assessment of OP Multi-annual evaluation plans: + Very detailed descriptions of organisational structures and procedures Coherent description of the regulatory framework Evaluation strategies are but basically developped (due to the unfinished process of programming) Deficits in the rationale for the planned evaluations High self-committment resulting from the description of organisational structures and procedures - Daniel.Jansen@mags.nrw.de / savioli@feedback-bremen.de

  5. Proposal for revision and update of the template for multi-annual evaluation plans 1. Increasing the benefit of the evaluation plan for the coordination and management of evaluations by concentrating on the deduction of an evaluation strategy 2. Adaptation of the self-committment to a level balancing the partnership aspects with administrative needs Daniel.Jansen@mags.nrw.de / savioli@feedback-bremen.de

  6. Development of an evaluation strategy based upon: • The OP: Central fields of interventions, priority axes, financial focal points, horizontal priorities, other national strategic priorities etc • The ex ante evaluation: main findings which give a hint on topics that should be further attended to or would need a prove in more detail • The monitoring-system capacitiy: • systematically missing data (Annex XXIII, OP) • suspected deficits of the data quality • information on which monitoring data will be provided how to the evaluators. Daniel.Jansen@mags.nrw.de / savioli@feedback-bremen.de

  7. Daniel.Jansen@mags.nrw.de / savioli@feedback-bremen.de

More Related