1 / 58

The Evolution of Homo sapiens : Current Views and Provocative Hypotheses

The Evolution of Homo sapiens : Current Views and Provocative Hypotheses. Outline I – Definitions etc II – 2 Fallacies III – “Important” genera IV – 2 Hypotheses for origin of H. sapiens. Cladistics. A type of phylogenetic analysis based on two premises:

cclemente
Download Presentation

The Evolution of Homo sapiens : Current Views and Provocative Hypotheses

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Evolution of Homo sapiens: Current Views and Provocative Hypotheses

  2. Outline • I – Definitions etc • II – 2 Fallacies • III – “Important” genera • IV – 2 Hypotheses for origin of H. sapiens

  3. Cladistics A type of phylogenetic analysis based on two premises: Synapomorphies define branching points. Synapomorphies are nested. Synapomorphy (def) -- Shared, derived trait in phylogenetic “tree”

  4. What types of traits can be used as synapomorphies? • Morphological • Developmental • Molecular

  5. Reliable trees are built using multiple traits  • Consensus trees.

  6. Alternative trees of “great apes” • What do these trees show? • What’s different about them?

  7. Growing tendency to use horizontal representations. • Why? • Basal = ancestral (“primitive”) • Derived = descendant

  8. Timeline on tree • How do we date divergences?

  9. Dating divergences: • Fossil record + radiometric dating • What if no fossil of common ancestor? (e.g., first animal, first mammal, first primate) • Molecular clocks

  10. Molecular clocks • Some DNA/aa sequences diverge at linear rates over time. • These can be used to date divergences among lineages.

  11. Order Primates • Adapted to arboreal existence • Dexterous hands, feet; partially or fully opposable thumbs/big toes • Frontal eyes; color vision • Short jaws • Low fecundity Monkeys have 1-3 young; apes have singletons.

  12. Primate Classification/Terminology • Prosimian = “pre-monkeys” • Anthropoid = monkeys and apes (45 mya) • Hominids = great apes (25 mya) = chimps, gorillas, orangutan, human

  13. Hominids= great apes • Hominins = modern humans and their ancestors since the split with the lineage  chimps (5.4 – 7 mya) • Estimates of nuclear DNA similarity: 95 % • Homo = humans

  14. II. Fallacies of human evolution

  15. Fallacy 1: Hominins evolved early to hunt large game. Reality: Early hominins scavenged and ate plants.

  16. Fallacy 2: hominins an anagenetic lineage leading to humans.

  17. Fallacy 2: hominins an anagenetic lineage leading to humans.

  18. Fallacy 2: hominins an anagenetic lineage leading to humans.

  19. Reality: a branching tree • coexistence of species • rapid disappearance of some forms

  20. III. “Important” Hominin Genera Australopithecus (4.5 - 2.2 mya) Homo (2.3 mya – present) • All fossils > 1.8 my from east and southern Africa Australopithecus

  21. First innovation: Bipedalism (> 4 mya) • (Drier climate led to receding forest (?)) hominins moved on savannah • Possible advantages of bipedality in open terrain

  22. Australopithecus afarensis (2.3mya) • “Ape brain and human body” • Upright posture; knees and hips similar to ours • Lived in small groups • Ate plants, scavenged • Over 100 fossils

  23. A. afarensis • Arms remained long, curved fingers • Feet similar to ours

  24. Additional australopithecine innovations • A. garhi – tool maker (for extracting bone marrow), meat eater • Best candidate for species directly ancestral to Homo

  25. Current controversy: When did Homo evolve? H.e. Wood B, Collard M (1999) Science 284: 65-71.

  26. Homo evolved about 2.3 mya (?) • Rapid increase in relative cranial capacity • Further jaw reduction  flatter faces • H. (or A.) habilis – “handy man”

  27. “Homo” habilis • made and used sharp tools – Early Stone Age • (Recent ? about its status as ancestor)

  28. Homo ergaster/ H. erectus • Evolved 1.9 mya • Big ↑ in cranial capacity • Modern dentition • Sexual size dimorphism decreasing

  29. Modifications for long-distance walking/running: • Upper body – balance • Mid body – hip/gluteus • Lower body – joints/tendons/feet • Evidence of diet changes: jaw/teeth/rib cage

  30. H. e: Out of Africa 1 • Made multi-purpose hand axes • First to use fire and expand into temperate region ( ≥1 mya). • Drought in Africa  deforestation • Larger home range of carnivores • May have cooked meat

  31. Homoneanderthalensis • 300 – to 30 kya • European • Brain size larger (1500 cc) than modern humans • Heavier build; cold-adapted • Historical debate of status as ancestor

  32. IV Evolution of Homo sapiens sapiens:A contemporary controversy • Multiregional hypothesis • “Out of Africa 2” hypothesis (“African Replacement”)

  33. Competing Hypotheses • Multiregional – H.e’s colonized widely, and adapted to local conditions, gradually evolved into H. sapiens • By this view, H.e  Neanderthal  Cro-Magnon; other people diverged in parallel fashion

  34. Competing Hypotheses • Out of Africa 2– Homo sapiens evolved in Africa, migrated to Europe by 40,000 ya • Cro-Magnon resulted from a second migration into western Europe • May have caused extinction of Neanderthal

  35. Fossil evidenceFavors OOA 2 • Anatomically modern human present in Africa (160 kya) well before H.e. disappeared • Homo sapiens idaltu (discovered 1997) • Thrived during inter-glacial period, 130 – 74 kya

  36. Molecular evidence favors OOA @ • Haplotype – a combination of linked alleles (transmitted together during meiosis) • Haplogroup – a group of closely related haplotypes • Haplogroups can be used to track intraspecific radiations, esp. using mitochondria or Y- chrom HLA

  37. z a b y x “Mitochondrial Eve” – common matrilineal ancestor lived in Africa about 200 - 150 kya. • “Y- chromosome Adam” in Africa 90 – 60 kya (?). w

  38. Differences in age of “Eve” and “Adam”: variation of male vs female RS • Woman with Guinness record: • Mrs. Vasilyev (1700’s: 16 sets twins; 7 sets triplets; 4 sets quads) !! • Man with greatest number: • ??? • 16 million living men may carry Ghenghis Khan’s Y-chromosome

  39. For every man with above average RS, others must have below average RS. • Human males also have higher mortality rates from infancy on.

  40. Mitochondrial and Y- DNA haplogroups useful for tracing human migrations

  41. Current Status of Debate • Genetic bottleneck 60,000 – 75,000 ya • Disease, volcanic winter?

  42. Mt. Toba Eruption: 70 -76 kya • Candidate for bottleneck. • 6 yr volcanic winter • 2000 – 20,000 humans survived ….mostly in Africa. • Recolonization. • Effect of bottleneck: loss of genetic diversity

  43. OOA2: Radiation of Homo sapiens sapiens • 60,000 ya -- Australasia • 40,000 ya – Europe • 30,000 ya – Americas

  44. Neanderthals Survived the bottleneck event Located on the migration route out of Africa.  Interbreeding  H. sapiensacquired “temperate –zone adapted” genes

  45. Reproductive isolation < 1 Abi-Rached, L et al. Nature on line; Yotova V et al (2011) Mol Biol Evol 28: 1957 – 1962. Unresolved: Extent to which coexisting species interbred

  46. Evidence that Neanderthals could talk: FOXP2 allele Shape/position of hyoid bone Comparison with other hominids

  47. How old is spoken language?

  48. 40 kya several extant hominins • Denisovans – Siberia • H. neanderthalensis – NW Europe • H. floresiensis – Indonesia • H. sapiens – widespread • Interbreeding ↑ temp-zone adaptation, but may have also ↑ auto-immune disease Abi-Rached et al 2011. Science 334:89 -94.

More Related