1 / 27

Hydroinformatics and decision support: current technological trends and future prospects

Hydroinformatics and decision support: current technological trends and future prospects. Andreja Jonoski. Contents. Brief Introduction to Hydroinformatics Data sharing standards and interoperability Cloud and Grid Computing

celine
Download Presentation

Hydroinformatics and decision support: current technological trends and future prospects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hydroinformatics and decision support: current technological trends and future prospects AndrejaJonoski

  2. Contents • Brief Introduction to Hydroinformatics • Data sharing standards and interoperability • Cloud and Grid Computing • DIANE-CM project: stakeholder collaboration in flood risk management

  3. Hydroinformatics • Origins: early 1990-ies • Encapsulated water-related knowledge for continuously increasing user categories • Key development: Modelling systems • Generic computational codes with powerful user interfaces (pre- and post-processors) • Users – different than the code developers • Markets for modelling systems software products

  4. Hydroinformatics • Current situation – driven by the Internet • Market still dominated by modelling systems products • Modelling services are emerging • New data sharing standards are emerging that enable interoperability • User base broadened to stakeholders, citizens using sophisticated technologies (web, mobile phones) • New kinds of applications targeting new users

  5. Data sharing standards • Data needs to be shared between peopleand between software components • Many attempts in the past focused on either of these targets • Solution seemingly able to simultaneously target both: eXtensible Markup Language (XML)

  6. Data sharing standards • XML is similar to HyperText Markup Language (HTML), but the focus is not on presentation, but on semantics (meaning) of data • Hierarchical presentation of data in a tree-like structure • Data are provided together with their description • Easily readable by computers, and understandable by humans • Increasingly used in software applications

  7. Data sharing standards • However, XML is not enough for standardisation • Different domains need to be described in a standardised way in terms of their objects, properties and relations • Result: emergence of many XML-based domain descriptions • Usually recognisable by the ‘ML’ at the end • AdsML: Markup language used for interchange of data between advertising systems • FpML: Financial Products Markup Language • GML: Geography markup language for expressing and exchanging geographical features • WaterML: Language for expressing and sharing time series of water-related data

  8. Data sharing standards • Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) http://www.opengeospatial.org/ • Many standards for geo-spatial data: • Web Map Service ( WMS) • Web Feature Service (WFS) • Web Coverage Services (WCS) • Water ML – emerging standard for time series data • Originated in USA, further developed by OGC Hydrology working group

  9. Data sharing standards • Example WaterML file

  10. Interoperability • Modelling systems may increasingly start using standardised formats • Example HEC software DSSVue (USACE)

  11. Interoperability • Interoperability with dynamic coupling • Open Modelling Interface (OpenMI) • www.openMI.org • Coupling in which different models exchange data during runtime (per time step) • Software components (modelling systems) require code adaptation to become OpenMI compliant

  12. Cloud and Grid computing Two aspects: 1. Possibility for deploying applications, (including models and data) on the web, without maintaining them as stand alone applications 2. Harnessing the power of many parallel computational elements • Cloud computing – service orientation model: • Infrastructure as a service • Platform as a service • Software as a service

  13. Cloud and Grid computing Example from existing software provider

  14. Cloud and Grid computing New possibilities • Cloud computing framework for a hydro information system • (Delipetrev et al., this conference)

  15. Cloud and Grid computing Grid computing: • Organisations pool autonomous computing resources together for common purpose • Usually for scientific research • They create Virtual Research Communities that form Virtual Organisations (VOs) • All participants can benefit from the shared computing resources • Less costly alternative to supercomputers • European Grid Infrastructure http://www.egi.eu/

  16. Cloud and Grid computing • Example: www.envirogrids.net SWAT SWAT-CUP

  17. ExampleDIANE-CM PROJECT Decentralised Integrated ANalysis and Enhancement of Awareness through Collaborative Modelling and Management of Flood Risk

  18. DIANE-CM PROJECT Collaborative flood risk management

  19. Case studies

  20. Collaborative platform (CM) and Collaborative Modelling Exercise (CME) http://hikm.ihe.nl/diane_cm/cranbrook/ http://hikm.ihe.nl/diane_cm/alster/ TIMELINE OF THE DIANE-CM PROJECT

  21. Example objectives (UK)

  22. Example alternatives (UK)

  23. Steps in Collaborative Modelling Exercise (CME)

  24. Steps in Collaborative Modelling Exercise (CME) • Visualisation of the individual positions versus the group as a whole • Darker blue colours represent more preferred alternatives by the whole group • Individual ranking of the same alternative with markers • Different markers for different stakeholder group • Similar individual rankings grouped in clusters

  25. Preliminary conclusions(feedback from stakeholders) • Collaborative modelling approach is much appreciated by stakeholders • Demands for more information • Diverse stakeholders require diverse presentation forms of the same information • Potential for increased flood risk awareness in communities

  26. Thank you !

More Related