1 / 3

item_607_Results_group_2

Download Presentation

item_607_Results_group_2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Results group 2Observations.General Evaluation of Roadside Checks.1 – site not dedicated to check, public driving through2 – no facilities for examiners3 – no safety shoes worn by examiners4 – use of flash camera’s around ‘class 3’ tankers!5 – check only looked at ADR, no roadworthiness examinations6 – overall role of Police / who authorised to check vehicles?7 – why 2 inspectors for 1 vehicle8 – is other equipment available

  2. What wrong with roadside checks?Nothing wrong with practice of carrying out checks, only comments with regard to \procedures , equipment, infrastructure and competances.

  3. How to improve1 – site layout (weighing pads?)2 – examine all aspects of vehicle not just ADR3 – have a step by step approach to examinations4 – involvement from all agencies/departments5 – procedures for ‘opening’ seals, many goods vehicles had seals restricting examination 6 – improve layout of check form

More Related