1 / 13

Edward Snowden: Saving us from the United Stasi of America

Edward Snowden: Saving us from the United Stasi of America. By Daniel Ellsberg Document 3 Group 3: Annalisia Anderson, Johnathan Whisenant, Jessca Brewster, Joe Heininger. Background. -Edward Snowden -American computer specialist -Previously worked for CIA and NSA -Revealed programs

chaney
Download Presentation

Edward Snowden: Saving us from the United Stasi of America

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Edward Snowden: Saving us from the United Stasi of America By Daniel Ellsberg Document 3 Group 3: Annalisia Anderson, Johnathan Whisenant, Jessca Brewster, Joe Heininger

  2. Background -Edward Snowden -American computer specialist -Previously worked for CIA and NSA -Revealed programs -Interception of U.S. and European telephonemetadata, Internet surveillance programs -Charged with espionage,theft of government property

  3. Vocabulary & Allusions -Kangaroo court -Rubber Stamp -Judicial oversight -Intelligence committees in Congress -Detention -Drones -Co-opted -Dissent -Checks and Balances -Legislative -Bradley Manning -Disclose -Edward Snowden -NSA -Whistleblowing -Pentagon Papers -Coup -Revocation -Unwarranted -Intrusion -Court Warrant -Fisa -Deferential

  4. Vocabulary and Allusions (Cont.) -Withhold -Revoke -Senator Frank Church -Abyss -FBI -CIA -Surveillance -Stasi -Revelations -Restraint -Wholesale

  5. Persona - Daniel Ellsberg - Military Analyst (During the Vietnam War) - Released the Pentagon Papers - Anti-war, Peace Activist - Educated - High level of diction throughout article - “Deferential, revocation, revelations” - Patriotic - Supporter of the Constitution - “...the Bill of Rights for which this country fought over 200 years ago...the Fourth and Fifth Amendments virtually suspended”

  6. Audience -Aimed towards an informed or active audience -Involved/interested in current events -Published on “The Guardi ” -Same source Edward Snowden leaked information to -Aimed towards someone who considers themselves ‘rational’ => Appeals towards original values / ‘American moral’

  7. Purpose -Primary purpose is to inform, to educate - Warning: “[I]t puts in danger the very liberties we’re trying to protect” -”I fear for our democracy.” -Call to people with intent to inform and encourage action similar to Snowden - “Pressure by an informed public on Congress”

  8. Argument The increasing corruption within government, epitomized by the infringement on American’s right to privacy forces America into a ‘Stasi’ status and currently threatens the sanctity of democracy. The only way out of this “abyss”(2) is to put “[p]ressure by an informed public on Congress … to bring NSA and the rest of the intelligence community under real supervision and restraint and restore the protections of the bill of rights.”

  9. Structure of Argument -Organized in degrees of intensity -Begins: Background on the Edward Snowden Case, hints at the point he is trying to make, informs the reader, sets up the ‘foundation’ -Middle: Critical tone takes over, cites historical evidence to call to your logic/ration -End: Emotional call to your ‘patriotic senses’

  10. Structure of Argument (Continued) -Ethos: -Refers to prior works to increase his integrity -Pentagon Papers - War in Vietnam -Pathos: -Call to ‘American moral’=> Pulls at patriotic heart-strings -9/11 -4th and 5th amendments -Vietnam War -Bill of Rights -US Constitution -Democracy - “The abyss” -Logos: -Historical Evidence/Connotations -Senator Frank Church

  11. Tone and Diction -Tone: Critical, Respectful -Criticizes the government throughout article - “[Congressional Leaders] went along with it… only shows how broken the system of checks and balances” -Tone shifts to admiring (in relation to Snowden) -“Snowden did what he did because he recognised the NSA’s surveillance programs for what they are” -Diction -Diction is not overly complicated but still intelligent -oversight, safeguard, unconstitutional Begins with “In my estimation” -Knowing his opinion, may be considered controversial or disagreeable - Begins to respectfully inform you

  12. Syntax and Overall Structure - Use of dashes (-) -Interjects his own argument to expand or emphasize a certain aspect -Opportunity to create a greater effect on the reader -Sentences structured similarly to how he would speak -”And”, “But” - Interjected opinions -More personal and genuine feeling to the paper

  13. Discussion Questions -How does comparing the US to the Stasi effect the argument of the article? -How does the opinion of Snowden’s actions in the third article differ from the opinion of snowdens actions in the fourth article and why? -Do you yourself believe that snowden made the right choice by leaking information about the NSA?

More Related