1 / 27

NSLS II: Accelerator System Overview Project Advisory Committee October 27, 2006 Satoshi Ozaki

NSLS II: Accelerator System Overview Project Advisory Committee October 27, 2006 Satoshi Ozaki. Introduction. NSLS II: A highly optimized, third generation, medium energy storage ring for the x-ray synchrotron radiation: The CD-0 approval articulated required capabilities as:

Download Presentation

NSLS II: Accelerator System Overview Project Advisory Committee October 27, 2006 Satoshi Ozaki

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NSLS II: Accelerator System Overview Project Advisory Committee October 27, 2006 Satoshi Ozaki

  2. Introduction • NSLS II: A highly optimized, third generation, medium energy storage ring for the x-ray synchrotron radiation: • The CD-0 approval articulated required capabilities as: • ~ 1 nm spatial resolution, • ~ 0.1 meV energy resolution, and • single atom sensitivity (or sufficiently high brightness). • These requirements translate into the target parameters of the storage ring as; • ~3 GeV, 500 mA, top-up injection • Brightness ~ 7x1021 photons/sec/0.1%bw/mm2/mrad2 • Flux ~ 1016 photons/sec/0.1%bw • Ultra-low emittance (x, y): 1 nm horizontal, ~0.01 nm vertical •  20 straight sections for insertion devices ( 5 m), • A high level of reliability and stability of operation.

  3. Design Concept for the Baseline Configuration • Wherever possible use conventional technology with well established experience at existing light sources or other storage rings • Use standard S-band linac, commercially available, as the pre-injector • Use booster as the injector in order to ensure the reliability • Use top-up injection mode for stable stored beam current • Place booster in the storage ring tunnel to save the cost of a separate accelerator enclosure and service building • For storage ring lattice, use DBA with 30 straight sections, 8 of them for damping wigglers for emittance reduction, 3 for accelerator services, leaving 19 for user insertion devices. • Use weak bend (0.4 T) to enhance the emittance reduction factor of damping wigglers. • Bending magnets with 2.4 keV critical energy will be used for soft X-ray and infra-red light source • Choice of insertion devices will be base on the user requirement and fund for them and their front-ends are set aside as trust funds • The boundary between the accelerator system and beam line is at the exit from ratchet wall

  4. Booster Storage Ring Linac Accelerator System Configuration Booster • NSLS II Accelerator System: • 200 MeV S-band Linac • 3 GeV 1 Hz Booster • Top-up injection once per minute • 3 GeV storage ring: 30 DBA configuration • 15 long (8 m) straight with high -function • 15 short (5 m) straight with low -function Storage Ring

  5. 3-D Model of the SR Tunnel • There are no booster magnets over the SR straight section. • The tunnel will not be too crowded due to: • Low and narrow profile of SR girders • Compact designs of the front end components • Small sizes of the booster magnets

  6. Renderingof the NSLS II Ring (Rear View)

  7. The Preliminary Review of NSLS II Lattice and Accelerator Configuration: May 11-12, 2006 The Committee : • Dr. Carlo Bocchetta, Sincrotrone Trieste • Dr. Michael Boege, Swiss Light Source • Dr. Michael Borland, Argonne National Laboratory • Dr. Max Cornacchia, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (retired), Chairman • Dr. Mikael Eriksson, MAXLAB • Dr. Thomas Roser, Brookhaven National Laboratory • Dr. Christoph Steier, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory The approach of NSLS II is to achieve the performance goal • with a lattice whose focussing strength is comparable to that of existing 3-rd generation sources, but that also includes a number of damping wigglers to further reduce the emittance without the deleterious effect on the dynamic aperture normally associated with strong focussing lattices. • Thus, the proposed design includes innovative ideas for a light source (damping wigglers and soft bends), informed by the experience of state-of-the-art existing facilities. • While the design presents challenges for the beam dynamics, beam instrumentation, controls and hardware, the performance goals appear achievable.

  8. Injector Linac • S-band linac system providing 200 MeV electron beams of 7 nC to the Booster in one pulse • Electron source: thermionic DC gun modulated to match 500 MHz RF of booster and storage ring • Five accelerating structures with three klystrons operating at 1.3 GHz • The system commercially available in turn-key procurement: • ACCEL • THALES

  9. Booster Synchrotron • 200 MeV to 3 GeV booster • Hung below the ceiling of the storage ring tunnel and has the same circumference of 780 m • The lattice arranged to have no booster components above storage ring straight sections, except for one 8-m straight for RF cavity • Relatively light weight small magnets; low power and air cooled: • 60 combined function dipoles: 1.5 m long, 25 mm gap, 0.7 T, ~580 kg • 96 quadrupoles: 0.3 m long, <10T/m, ~45 kg • 15 sextupoles: 0.4 m long, <200T/m2, ~55 kg • 15 sextupoles: 0.2 m long, <200T/m2,~30 kg • 60 orbit correctors • Up to 100 bunches per cycle for initial fill • Up to 20 bunches per cycle with the hunt-and-fill bunch pattern • One PETRA-type (commercially available) RF cavity • Very low emittance at the storage injection energy helps smooth low loss top-up injection. • Purchase components from industry based on our reference design, and build and commission in-house • Turn-key procurement of a compact booster in separate tunnel: an option

  10. Booster Lattice and its Relationship with Storage Ring

  11. Storage Ring Lattice Layout Linac RF Station

  12. Storage Ring Storage ring configuration • DBA30 lattice (780m circumference) with 15 super-periods, each ~52m long • Super-period: two identical cells separated by alternating 5m and 8m straights • Short straight: x = 2.7m, y = 0.95m, and dispersion = zero • Long straight: x = 18.2m, y = 3.1m, and dispersion = zero • This Hi-Lo  is suited for variety of ID as well as top-off injection • Weak bends (0.4T) with damping wigglers to achieve ultra-small emittance • Lattice magnet: (designed with 20% head room) • Dipoles: 60 (50 with 35 mm gap and 10 with 60 mm gap for IR beams) • Quadrupoles: 360 • Sextupoles : 390 • Correctors and skew quadrupoles: 240 + (4 X ID) • 500 MHz superconducting RF cavities each operating with 270 kW power level • Harmonic number (No. of buckets): 1300, of which ~ 80% will be filled • A 2-cell harmonic cavities for bunch lengthening Bare lattice performances: • 3 GeV, 500 mA, Top-up with current stability of <1% • Bare Lattice: x ~2.1 nm, y ~0.008 nm (Diffraction limited at 12 keV) • Pulse Length without harmonic cavities (rms): 2.9 mm/~10 psec • Robust dynamic and momentum aperture: ≥25 mm H, ≥15 V, ~±3%

  13. Dispersion Section of a Cell Alignment tolerance of multipoles on a girder is 30 m, whereas girder-to-girder tolerance is ~100 m In order to reduce the transmission of ground vibrations beam height is set at 1 m from the SR tunnel floor, instead of standard 1.4 m. Girder Resonant Frequency > 50 Hz

  14. Lattice functions of half of an NSLS-II SR super-period (one cell).

  15. Dynamic Aperture of the Lattice For on momentum and off momentum cases by 3%

  16. Horizontal Emittance vs. Energy Radiated by DW Dots represent the cases with 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 damping wigglers, each 7-m long with 1.8 T field

  17. RF Power Up-grade Path RF Power Requirements for Dipole and Various Insertion Device Configurations.

  18. Ultimate Configuration and Performances Ultimate Configuration: • 8 damping wigglers (7 m long, 1.8T peak field) • 4 RF cavities with 1,080 kW of RF power Expected performances at 3 GeV: • Beam current: 500 mA • Emittance: x ~ 0.5 nm, y ~ 0.008 nm • Flux ~ 1016 photons/sec/0.1%bw • Brightness ~ 1021 photons/sec/0.1%bw/mm2/mrad2 • Beam Size (x/ y) at the center of short straights: ~38.5/~3.1 m • Beam Divergence (x’/y’) ~18.2/~1.8  rad • Pulse Length (rms) with damping wigglers: 4.5 mm/~15 psec • 19 user device (e.g., undulators) straights (15 x 5 m & 4 x 8 m) • 4 long straights for large gap user insertion devices • 15 short straight for user undulators, some with canting • 8 user compatible (fixed gap) damping wigglers • Many bending magnets for soft X-ray beam lines (critical energy ~2.4 keV) • Up to 5 bending magnets for IR, far-IR, and THz beamlines

  19. Baseline Configuration & Performances Proposed baseline (CDR): • 3 damping wigglers (7 m long, 1.8T peak field) • 2 RF cavities with 540 kW of RF power • 5 user beamlines (supported by trust funds) Expected performances at 3 GeV: • Beam current: step-by-step increase to 500 mA • Emittance: x ~ 1 nm, y ~ 0.008 nm • Flux ~ 1016 photons/sec/0.1%bw ? • Brightness ~ 7x1020 photons/sec/0.1%bw/mm2/mrad2 ? • Beam Size (x/ y) at the center of short straights: ~54.5/~3.1 m ? • Beam Divergence (x’/y’) ~25.7/~1.8  rad ? • Pulse Length (rms) with damping wigglers: 4.5 mm/~15 psec ? • No. of DW that can be used for light source: 3 • Max number of ID beam lines: ~10 (e.g., 6 CPMU [3 m] and 4 EPU [4 m]) • A number of bending magnets for soft X-ray beam lines (EC ~2.4 keV) • No. of IR beams from wide gap dipoles:  5

  20. Issues for Further Studies • Development of precision alignment (~30 µm) technology • Development of the optimum orbit correction and feedback scheme for high level orbit stability: • A factor of ~3 improvement over the submicron stability recently reported with some recent light sources • Impact and remediation of 5 mm gap undulator with short pitch to the dynamic aperture and the beam life-time • Because of the vertical focusing effect of undulators with short pitch, they cannot occupy the part of the ID straight where the vertical -function is large, i.e., areas away from the center of the straight • This limits the 5 mm gap undulator length to ~3 m • Impact of EPU on dynamics of the beam • Use of canted insertion device • Overall value engineering efforts

  21. Accelerator System Division Organization Began working on development of baseline configuration in January 2006 ~42 people from NSLS, C-AD, SMD: many of them on part-time base. Effective FTE for this period: ~16.5 Many people from other laboratories (APS, ALS, MIT Bates) provided help The organization anticipated for the construction effort: Accelerator Systems Division Director Deputy Director *: also support beamline efforts Accelerator Physics Group Injector System Sub-Project Mechanical Engineering Group* Electrical Engineering Group* Storage Ring System Sub-Project RF Group Diagnostic & Controls Group Insertion Devices Group

  22. Summary • Made good progress in last nine months in developing CDR for NSLS II • Optimized and define the configuration of the accelerator systems • Undertook conceptual, in some case more detailed, design of accelerator systems • Assembled accelerator parameter tables • We have a innovative design of highly optimized synchrotron light source capable of meeting requirement articulated in CD-0 document with ultra-high performances • There are a number of issues requiring further study:. • Insertion devices and their impact on the dynamic aperture and beam life-time • Diagnostics and feed-back for the required highly stable beam operation • General value engineering exercise to control costs

  23. Parametric Comparison of Lattice

  24. Injector Linac Parameters

  25. Booster Ring Parameters

  26. Storage Ring Parameters

  27. Storage Ring Parameters (Continue)

More Related