1 / 26

TRADE SECRET SEGMENT

TRADE SECRET SEGMENT. PROF. JANICKE 2011. SOURCES OF LAW. 45 STATES: UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT – CIVIL TEXAS: CASELAW DOCTRINES BASED ON 1st REST. OF TORTS (1939); ALSO CRIMINAL STATUTE TEX. PENAL CODE § 32.05. FEDERAL:

cher
Download Presentation

TRADE SECRET SEGMENT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TRADE SECRET SEGMENT PROF. JANICKE 2011 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  2. SOURCES OF LAW 45 STATES: UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT – CIVIL TEXAS: CASELAW DOCTRINES BASED ON 1st REST. OF TORTS (1939); ALSO CRIMINAL STATUTE TEX. PENAL CODE § 32.05 IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  3. FEDERAL: • GOVERNMENT CIVIL ACTIONS AND CRIM. PROCEEDINGS – ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE ACT (1997) • NO PRIVATE CIVIL ACTION IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  4. WHAT IS A “TRADE SECRET” (1) ANY COMPETITIVELY VALUABLE INFORMATION (2) THAT’S NOT WIDELY KNOWN OR EASILY FOUND OUT (3) THAT THE POSSESSOR HAS TAKEN REASONABLE STEPS TO KEEP FROM DISCLOSURE IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  5. EXAMPLES MFG. METHODS MFG. MATERIALS BUSINESS PLANS IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  6. USE, OR EVEN PLANNED USE, IN POSSESSOR’S BUSINESS IS NOT NEEDED SECRECY OF INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS OR STEPS IS NOT NEEDED IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  7. THE PROBLEM OF CUSTOMER LISTS HAS CAUSED A CASE LAW QUAGMIRE OFTEN ARE EASILY LEARNED BY RIGHTFUL MEANS; HENCE NOT A “TRADE SECRET” CAN BECOME A SECRET BY ADDING PURCHASE HISTORY, PLANS, CONTACTS, ETC. IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  8. HARD-TO-GET REQUIREMENT LIBERALLY CONSTRUED TO HELP TRADE SECRET OWNER EXAMPLE: OBSCURE PUBLICATION OR SUPPLIER NAME IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  9. REASONABLE-MEASURES-FOR-SECRECY REQUIREMENT TYPICAL: EMPLOYEE AGREEMENTS MARKING DOCUMENTS AND DRAWINGS “CONFIDENTIAL” CIRCULATING WRITTEN POLICY POSTING WRITTEN POLICY IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  10. TYPICAL MEASURES (CONT’D): LIMIT TYPES OF EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE ACCESS LIMIT ACCESS TO PROJECT MEMBERS EXIT INTERVIEWS IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  11. PROTECTIVE MEASURES CAN BE BY IMPLICATION RATHER THAN EXPRESS, BUT RISKY TO LITIGATE IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  12. OWNERSHIP OF ON-THE-JOB DEVELOPMENTS CONTRACT PROVISION CONTROLS, IF THERE IS ONE IF THERE IS NO CONTRACT PROVISION, RESULT GOES BY THE EQUITIES GENERAL SKILLS OF A CALLING ARE ALWAYS OK FOR EMPLOYEE TO TAKE WITH HIM DEFINING THESE IS DIFFICULT IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  13. WHAT IS “MISAPPROPRIATION” USING UNDER WRONGFUL CONDITIONS: OBTAIN RIGHTFULLY, BUT USE IN BREACH OF AGREEMENT [MANY CASES] OBTAIN BY FRAUD OR INDUCING A BREACH OF CONFIDENCE [A FEW CASES] IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  14. WHAT IS NOT COPYING AN OPENLY AVAILABLE PRODUCT REVERSE ENGINEERING OF AN OPENLY AVAILABLE PRODUCT WHOLLY INDEPENDENT DESIGN ADOPTING THE DESIGN, AFTER DISCLOSURE UNDER CONTRACT OF NON-CONFIDENCE IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  15. MOST CASES INVOLVE RIGHTFUL LEARNING, AND THEN MISAPPROPRIATING TYPICAL PATTERNS: EMPLOYEES LEARN, THEN JUMP JOINT VENTURE PARTNER LEARNS, THEN VENTURE TERMINATES POTENTIAL BUYER OF BUSINESS LEARNS, AND SALE FALLS THROUGH IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  16. TYPICAL PATTERNS (CONT’D): HARDER TO DECIDE: EXECUTIVE DRIVES THE DEVELOPMENT, THEN JUMPS HARDER TO DECIDE: VENDOR, AGENT, ADVISOR CONTRIBUTES THE SECRET – THEN USES FOR OTHER CLIENTS IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  17. HARDEST CASES: FLY-OVERS ONE DECIDED CASE TRAILING SHOULD BE OK TRASH COLLECTING MAY BE OK ON THE TRADE SECRET FRONT; PERILOUS ON CRIMINAL FRONT; AND BAD PRESS IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  18. REMEDIES INJUNCTION PREVAILING U.S. VIEW: IF INFO HAS BEEN MADE PUBLIC BY OWNER, INJUNCTION SHOULD: BE LIMITED TO LEAD-TIME, NOT PERPETUAL TIME IT TOOK P minus TIME IT TOOK D IS A ROUGH RULE OF THUMB IP Survey – Trade Secrets 18

  19. TEXAS VIEW WHERE OWNER PUBLISHES THE SECRET • HYDE v. HUFFINES TEX. S. CT. 1958 IS AMBIGUOUS • WHERE OWNER OF SECRET PUBLISHES: • MODERN INTERPRETATION OF HYDE (PER RESTATEMENT OF UNFAIR COMPETITION) IS THAT LEAD-TIME INJUNCTION IS THE TEXAS RULE AS WELL AS THE NATIONAL RULE • HYDE WAS ENJOINED LONGER ONLY BECAUSE HE SUBMITTED NO EVIDENCE OF LEAD-TIME • PLAINTIFFS STILL ARGUE FOR A BROADER READING IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  20. WHERE WRONGDOER PUBLISHES THE SECRET • CASES SEEM TO INDICATE LONGER-TERM INJUNCTION IS POSSIBLE, MAYBE EVEN PERPETUAL • SITUATION IS UNCLEAR IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  21. DAMAGES ARE AVAILABLE COMPENS. AND PUNITIVE [UTSA: TREBLING] CAN BE UNJUST ENRICHMENT OR P’S LOSS OF BUSINESS HIGH SETTLEMENT RATE TR. SEC. CASES SOMETIMES INVOLVE PRELIM. INJUNC. HEARING SELDOM GO TO TRIAL IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  22. INJUNCTION AGAINST WORKING FOR A PARTICULAR COMPETITOR CAN BE HANDLED PER CONTRACT WHERE NO CONTRACT, THIS TYPE OF INJUNCTION IS COMMONLY SOUGHT TO PROTECT THE SECRET ARGUMENT: WORKING FOR “THEM” WILL INHERENTLY DIVULGE COUNTER-ARGUMENT: NEED TO EARN A LIVING IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  23. NON-COMPETE INJUNCTION WHERE NO CONTRACT PROVISION POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS: INJUNCTION REQUIRES KEEPING PERSON ON PAYROLL AND WORKING INJUNCTION REQUIRES PROVIDING MINIMUM CONSULTING FEES AND POSSIBLE WORK INJUNCTION LIMITED TO COMPETITOR DIVISION MOST LIKELY TO CAUSE BREACH IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  24. SPECIAL PROBLEM: CONTINUING TO ENJOIN WRONGDOER WHEN OWNER HAS PUBLISHED COMMONLY UNDERSTOOD: NON-WRONGDOERS ARE RELIEVED OF COVENANTS WHEN OWNER PUBLISHES WHEN A WRONGDOER MOVES TO DISSOLVE: SHOULD PREVIOUS WRONGDOER NOW BE THE ONLY ONE PRECLUDED FROM USE? IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  25. SPECIAL PROBLEM: STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ONE VIEW: MISAPPROPRIATION IS AN ONGOING TORT, NEW VIOLATION EVERY DAY HENCE, ONLY OLD MISUSES ARE CUT OFF; DAMAGES AND INJUNCTION ARE AVAILABLE FOR RECENT/FUTURE VIOLATIONS IP Survey – Trade Secrets

  26. SPECIAL PROBLEM: STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ANOTHER VIEW: ORIGINAL MISAPPROPRIATION STARTS THE ONLY CLOCK; WHEN IT RUNS, ALL ACTION IS BARRED TEXAS SOLUTION: SINGLE WRONG, SINGLE RUNNING -- BUT FROM DISCOVERY DATE (KNEW OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN) IP Survey – Trade Secrets

More Related