1 / 26

Spain´s New Energy Economy Boom and Bust of the Spanish Renewable Miracle

This article explores the impact of the EU's cap and trade scheme on Spain's renewable energy industry, highlighting the failure to reduce emissions and the high cost of subsidies. It also discusses the negative effects on job growth and the burden placed on energy distributors.

chesterr
Download Presentation

Spain´s New Energy Economy Boom and Bust of the Spanish Renewable Miracle

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Spain´s New Energy EconomyBoom and Bust of the Spanish Renewable Miracle Dr. Gabriel Calzada President, Instituto Juan de Mariana Associate Professor of Economics, King Juan Carlos University 2009 International Conference on Climate Change March 10, 2009. New York City

  2. Two different types of climate policy • The EU way: • Kyoto: Cap and trade scheme • Economic regulation • “Renewable” energies subsidies • The US way: • Promote growth and push technology (no caps, no big-scale regulation)

  3. EU´s/Kyoto´s cap and trade schemeThe claims • “Will reduce warming” • “Will reduce CO2 emissions” • “Will be done at low cost” • “Will create jobs”

  4. EU´s/Kyoto´s cap and trade schemeReality: the “benefits” • Reduction of 0,07 degrees Celsius if every country meet its target • No EU has not reduced emissions since Kyoto was signed • EU (15): increase (not decrease) since kyoto • Spain: 50,4% increase (about 40 since Kyoto) • Comparative performance • EU doubles US rate of increase • Kyoto countries vs US

  5. EU´s/Kyoto´s cap and trade schemeReality: “low cost” • Narbona´s promise: “The government has designed a gradual process to change the tendency […] and the bill that companies will have to pay starting next year in the emission market will collectively cost a maximum amount of 85 million euros per year.” [10/2004] • IJM estimated between 4 and 7 billion Euros (10-16 times what Narbona claimed) • PWC estimated 15 billion (35 times) • Government finally gives up: could be more than 3 billion • Lesson: policymakers can determinate cap or cost

  6. EU´s/Kyoto´s cap and trade schemeReality: jobs • Loss of competitiveness and job exportation • Companies are closing down • e.g., Valencia: The Valencia regional administration ordered the shutdown of three companies for violating the Kyoto protocol, as they tried to begin new production without greenhouse gas allocations, of which there were no more • Other companies are moving away • e.g., Acerinox S.A.: Acerinox, second largest stainless steel company in the world decided to severely reduce investments in its Spanish factory and increase the investment in its Kentucky plant expressly because of the ETS burden and related blackouts • for the same reasons Acerinox bought factory in South Africa and is looking to move part of its Spanish capacity to Eastern Europe. • Acerinox ex president (now retired), Victoriano Muñoz, had repeatedly warned that Kyoto CO2 rationing scheme “would place Spanish industries in a very grave situation”.

  7. Regulating to comply • The Electricity and Gas Sectors Planning. Transport Net Development 2002-2011 • Strategy for Energy Savings and Efficiency in Spain 2004-2012 • Plan for Developing Renewable Energies 2000-2010 • New Renewable Energies Plan 2005-2010 • Law of Integrated Control and Pollution Prevention • Efficiency and energetic savings in buildings Measures: • Regulation for Thermal Installations of Buildings • Technical Code of Buildings • Energetic Certification of Buildings • Updating Plan for agricultural equipments • The Spanish Forest Plan • Hydroforestry restoration Plan • Plan for complementary aid for forest development and organization • Subsidies Plan for sustainable management of public forests • National Plan against Desertification • The first National Plan for Municipal Solid Wastes 2000-2006 • National Plan for Dangerous Waste • National Plan for Polluted Lands • National Plan for the modernization of vehicles • Strategic Plan for Infrastructure and Transport • Another key element is the distribution of those allowances among the owners of those installations whose activity produce CO2 • National Allocation Plan • National Registry for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowances

  8. Renewable energy subsidiesReasons • Global warming policy • Green job creation • Economic stimulus

  9. Renewable energy subsidiesA Spanish story • TheEU wants to increase share of energy from renewable sources to 12% in 2010 and 20% in 2020 • Spain has been a leader in promoting “renewable energy” • Wind subsidies: 90% over market price for 15 years then 80% over • Solar subsidies: 575% over market for 25 years then 460% • 12 to 20% return

  10. Renewable bubble • Spanish companies become world leaders • 26.137 MW installed in “special regime” • Wind energy has largest share: 14,836 MW (10.2%) • Solar energy has 2934 MW (0.74%). The 2010 target was 371 MW • Big leverage: 80/20 • Waiting lists

  11. Renewable Bubble • Bigproduction means jobs: • 50,200 according to MITRE • 26,000 only in the solar sector since 2000. • It also meansbig subsidies: • 28.6 billion Euro • 0.7% of installed energy (solar) gets 9,6 bill Euro • Who pays? Energy distributors • “Deficit Tarifario” (DT): 15.7 billion • The green premiums represent 2/3 of the DT • Only in 2007 the renewable subsidies account for 2.6 billion Euros

  12. Unsustainable energy • Miguel Sebastian declared renewable energies are “green and clean but very costly” .“Last year the premiums paid sum up 2000 millions while this year will be 3000”. • The government had to reduce by 30% the subsidy to solar energy and placed a cap of 300 new solar MW (2253 MW has been installed in 2008) • Now the Spanish green industry is falling down and going abroad to find more generous governments willing to give away taxpayers´ money

  13. Unsustainable jobs • The softening of the renewable support in 2007 brought about 10,000 job losses • This year´s softening threatens to result in 40,000 new green unemployees • 15,000 in the solar industry

  14. Subprime jobs • The sector companies calculated they will have to fire over 40% of the workers • The sector generates almost no stable jobs (installation and construction) • The only way to generate jobs in this field is by creating artificially produced expectations

  15. Unsustainable subsidies • The CNE has been unable to sell the DT in the auctions even with government sponsorship • Companies have now to refinance over 15 billion Euros • This year the electricity had to be increased by 5.7% in order to cover the renewable subsidies of 2008 • According to CNE, under today´s system, the price of energy would have to increase by 31% starting this year to stop the bleeding • Opportunity cost: Spanish electricity companies have announced that due to DT they will have to cancel 4,5 b annual investment between 2007 and 2011 • Risk primium has jumped up

  16. Unsustainable energy • The reduction of the subsidies in September has reduced the market value to a fraction

  17. The bubble bursts

  18. Subprime energy • Last year only 750 MW out of the 15000 MW (5%) solar and wind energy installed counted to REE to calculate the coverage rate of the Spanish system

  19. Climate policy, energy and the crisis • Spain has one of the largest current account deficits (10%) • 2/3 energy deficit (oil) • EU Climate policy (Cap and trade scheme and renewable subsidies) is largely responsible • Under the present credit-crunch Spain has either to increase exports or diminish energy dependency to offer credit

  20. The economics of expensive energy • Expected incomes and costs are what drives investments • To produce you have to combine resources • The cheaper some of them are, the more possibilities exist to use them in different productive processes (offering interesting products at good prices to the consumer)

  21. The economics of expensive energy • Some factors, like wages in the US, are relatively high • But if combined with other cheaper and intensively used factors of production, such as low energy cost, the unitary cost can be competitive • Reducing the unitary costs will open new markets to layers of the population are not still marginal consumers • Expanding the market will create new investment, therby creating new jobs (despite high wages) • This is the way jobs are created

  22. Energy and the new economy • The total electricity consumed by major search engines in 2006 was 5 gigawatts (Las Vegas) • George Gilder: “The web machine is on track to be consuming half of world´s output electricity by end of this decade” • Microsoft´s power consumption has risen 10 times in the past three years • At 15 cents per kilowatt-hour, power dominated Google´s calculus of costs • James Snow: "We ran out of power before we ran out of space" • Microsoft and Yahoo are building me-too data centers in Quincy and Wenatchee, Washington

  23. Energy and the new economy • China plans to build 30 new nuclear plants • Comparative cost to establish data-centers

  24. EU climate policies and the crisis • Increases public spending when reductions are most needed • Redirects scarce real savings to inefficient ways of producing energy, thereby increasing costs of production • Makes it impossible to reduce trade deficit and restart credit markets • Subprime jobs and unemployment source • Reduces competitiveness

  25. EU climate Policy and the crisis • “Will reduce warming”? • “Will reduce CO2 emissions”? • “Will be done at low cost”? • “Will create jobs”?

  26. NO

More Related