1 / 54

Team Introduction

Team Introduction. Nuka Research and Planning Group, LLC. Pearson Consulting, LLC. Baldwin and Butler Cape International Moran Environmental Recovery Moran Towing Northern Economics The Glosten Associates. Vessel Traffic Update. Recent Vessel Traffic Figures Future Vessel Traffic.

chibale
Download Presentation

Team Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Team Introduction • Nuka Research and Planning Group, LLC. • Pearson Consulting, LLC. • Baldwin and Butler • Cape International • Moran Environmental Recovery • Moran Towing • Northern Economics • The Glosten Associates

  2. Vessel Traffic Update Recent Vessel Traffic Figures Future Vessel Traffic

  3. Recent Vessel Traffic • Year                Westbound           Eastbound • 2007                3581                            890 • 2008                3274                            957 • 2009                2886                            1088 • 2011                3178                            1355

  4. Anticipated Vessel Traffic • Two potential sources of additional traffic have emerged since Phase A was completed: • Proposed Canadian natural gas and crude oil pipelines to the Pacific Coast • Alaska OCS and oil shale development

  5. Liquefied Natural Gas • Kitimat LNG Venture (Apache, EOG Resources, Encana) • Canada LNG (Shell Canada, Mitsubishi, PetroChina, Korea Gas) (Kitimat) • BG Group and Spectra Energy (Prince Rupert) • ExxonMobil and Imperial Oil • First 3 are 6.9 bcfd; 2.5 ships per day-900 ships per year

  6. Crude Oil Pipeline Proposals • Kinder Morgan to expand their pipeline from Alberta to Vancouver • Would result in an additional 240 tankers per year carrying crude oil • Enbridge to build new pipeline to Kitimat • Approximately 180 to 190 tankers carrying crude oil per year

  7. Alaska OCS and Oil Shale • Potential to displace Canadian crude, which presently moves by pipeline to Washington State refineries. • These refineries were built to process ANS crude and are more profitable with ANS crude than Canadian crude. • The Canadian crude would then be exported to Asia resulting in about 60 additional tankers per year

  8. Task 1 & 2 Work Plan Developing an Integrated Response System for the Aleutians

  9. Scope An Integrated Response System/Organization for the Aleutians • Emergency Towing • Salvage/Marine Firefighting • Open Water Response • Nearshore Response • Operating Organization

  10. Vision Analyze all available marine response services for the Aleutians. Determine which services will can be most effective and then develop a plan for a response system that will provide an suite of response capabilities optimized for the Aleutians. Our measure of success will be that the plan is adopted and implemented.

  11. Goal Prevent/minimize future environmental harm to the people and natural resources of the Aleutians Subarea by developing an integrated response system that will: • Provide an optimum set of response services • Be congruent with State/Federal regulations • Be cost effective • Be feasible and practical • Supported and accepted by marine industry

  12. Objectives 1) Provide an Analysis of: • Emergency Towing • Salvage and Marine Firefighting • Oil Spill Response • Open Water Response • Nearshore Response • Management Organizations

  13. Objectives 2) Describe an Optimal Response System considering operating environment, logistics, cost, and benefits. Provide a plan that will be a blueprint of an organization that can implement this optimized system.

  14. Work Plan • Regulatory Resource Requirements Analysissetting a benchmark to build toward • Response Gap Analysisevaluate how often a service may be delivered • Emergency Towing Analysis • Salvage and Marine Firefighting Analysis • Oil Spill Response Analysis • Management System Analysis

  15. Work Plan • Describe Optimal Response System • Conduct a Benefit Cost Analysis on this System • Draft Report • Review • Final Report • Integrate into the Subarea Plan

  16. Assumptions • The Non-tank Vessel Regulations will be adopted and provide a driver for those vessel to participate in a response organization • The regulated marine industry will support a reasonable and effect response capability in the Aleutians • The system will have to be phased in over time • The system will serve the Aleutians, but will support and be supported by other areas • The Subarea Committee may embody this plan in the SCP

  17. Regulatory Resource Analysis • Compile the applicable State/Federal regulations • Without considering Alternate Compliance, estimate the resources necessary to provide the services necessary to comply with these regulations for: • 600,000 bbl Crude Oil Tanker • 68,000 GT Containership >4,500 TEU • Estimate the capital and operating costs to provide these services • Use these costs as the design benchmark for planning a response system for the Aleutians

  18. Response Gap Analysis • Response Gap is the percentage of time that a particular service can be utilized • Hind cast technique to evaluate how often a particular service can be effectively used • Buoy database for winds, sea state, temperature • Airport database for visibility • Determine the limitations for a particular service and see how often these services were exceed in the past

  19. Observation Locations

  20. Emergency Towing Vessels

  21. Emergency Towing Vessels • Results from Phase A • 6 locations and 16 scenarios

  22. Emergency Towing Vessels • Results from Phase A • Five Risk Reduction Options • Dedicated towing vessel(s) • Non-dedicated towing vessel(s) • Seasonal towing vessel(s) • Vessels of opportunity • Some combination of the above

  23. Emergency Towing Vessels • Tug Operating environment • Candidate ships from transit study • 16 scenarios from Phase A • Weather conditions from environmental study • Number of tugs from location study

  24. Emergency Towing Vessels • Propose Tug Mission Requirements • Limited to emergency towing • Bollard pull/HP • Seakeeping abilities • Size, crew, equipment

  25. Emergency Towing Vessels • Tug Location Study • Use Phase Ascenarios (6 locations) • Identify potential home ports • Identify required infrastructure improvements • Determine required distances and speeds • Input for number of tugs required

  26. Emergency Towing Vessels • Tug options • Vessels of opportunity • Best available technology world wide • Best available technology in the US • Optimal design for the Aleutians (high speed)

  27. Emergency Towing Vessels • Vessel(s) of opportunity • Representative available vessels • Enumerate specifications/capabilities • Time/ability to hand off their tows • Location in the Aleutians • Time periods in the Aleutians • Capability gap analysis

  28. Emergency Towing Vessels • Best available technology evaluation • Evaluate both world wide and Jones Act vessels • Enumerate specs and capabilities • Speed/range/bollard pull/crew • Number Required • Cost to procure design • Cost to modify design to US standards (foreign design)

  29. Emergency Towing Vessels • Best available technology (cont.) • Cost to modify for Aleutian Service • Cost to construct vessel in US • Cost to charter vessel (Jones Act vessel) • Operating costs • Dedicated vessel • Non-dedicated vessel • Seasonal dedicated vessel • Capability Gap Analysis

  30. Emergency Towing Vessels • High Speed ETV design • Meet mission requirements with higher speed to reduce number of vessels • Proposed speed • 30-40 knots • Propulsion study • Diesel/gas turbines • Propellers/water jets • High speed AND bollard pull

  31. Emergency Towing Vessels • High Speed ETV design (cont.) • Seakeeping Options • Length • Bow design • Roll reduction methods • Proposed Range • 700-950 Nautical miles in 24 hrs • Winch options • Weight vs. capabilities

  32. Emergency Towing Vessels • High Speed ETV design evaluation • Number Required (assumed to be one) • Cost/time to design • Cost to construct vessel in US • Operating costs • Dedicated vessel • Non-dedicated vessel • Seasonal dedicated vessel • Capability Gap Analysis ?

  33. Salvage Analysis • In coordination with the regulatory resource requirement analysis and as a result of the Phase A recommendations - • Analyze the four USCG approved Salvage Contractors ability to service the Aleutian Islands and to meet increased planning requirements

  34. Salvage Analysis • Review the need of any additional equipment / services to be stationed in the Aleutians and if so, the requirements and recommended location of same

  35. Oil Spill Response Analysis • Planning Vs. Performance • “Resourcing” to meet full planning standards (current) is not likely feasible • Resource bolstering at some level is needed • Other external factors and “gap analyses” are critical

  36. Oil Spill Response Analysis • Planned Approach for Resource Requirements • Regulatory Analysis • Consider offshore vs. near shore environments • Salvage & Firefighting: likely “point of spear” in offshore scenarios • Consider alternative methods & technologies

  37. Oil Spill Response Analysis • Evaluate Effectiveness through Response Gap Analysis • Feasibility – is it practical & sustainable? • Logistics, economics

  38. Oil Spill Response Analysis • Other Considerations: • Research completed to date vs. new assumptions • Understand trade-offs between supplemental resources vs. cascading (performance vs. planning & regulatory implications)

  39. Oil Spill Response Analysis • Other Considerations: • Impact of on-going USCG/BSSE/EPA work groups • Effective Daily Recovery Capacity (EDRC) • Response Resource Inventory (RRI) • Equipment Surge • Subpart J of the National Contingency Plan

  40. Management System Analysis • Evaluation of existing OSRO models • Utilize survey with standard questions • business form • membership, subscription etc. for coverage • general rate structures • governance

  41. Management System Analysis • Identification of model based on services provided [some / all ] • OSRO services • SMFF services • WSMC / SERVS – 72 hour initial response role • Planning – preparedness over time

  42. Management System Analysis • Consideration of cost allocation options based on profile of covered fleet • Vessel type [ NTV, TV, other] • Vessel size • Fuel / cargo type

  43. Management System Analysis • Consideration of business form to manage resources • Acquire resources • Contract for resources • Utilize mix based on type of resources required

  44. Optimal Response System • Considering the following factors for each service, we will develop a description of what we feel is the optimal mix of response services: • Response Gap - % time the service can be employed • Cost • Effective Risk Reduction

  45. Optimal Response System • We will also describe the best form of organization to manage the service • The combined costs of the organization will be no more than the amount determined in the regulatory analysis.

  46. Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) • BCA is a process for comparing the benefits and costs of a proposed action or project over a specified period of time to determine if it is feasible on its own and/or to determine its feasibility relative to other alternatives.

  47. Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) • Numerous federal agencies have defined how information in evaluated under BCA. • We propose to follow the Office of Management and Budget and Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for our BCA.

  48. Benefit Cost Analysis • We will conduct BCA on the recommended or optimized package of tactics developed by the team. • Following the initial BCA, we can look at inputs to determine the relative benefits of individual tactics. • This feedback will help to optimize the tactics employed and increase the benefit/cost ratio or net benefit.

  49. Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) • CEA is another form of economic analysis that can be applied when benefits are difficult to quantify. • CEA can provide the cost per unit of benefit for different alternatives as a way to determine the most efficient alternative. • CEA could be employed to evaluate the cost per barrel of oil not spilled, for example, for each alternative or group of alternatives.

More Related