1 / 9

Trevor Woodhams , MD

Limitations with Vision for Near, Distance, and Social Activities: A Comparison Among Three Models of Presbyopia -Correcting IOLs. Trevor Woodhams , MD. Financial Disclosure: Alcon sponsored the study and provided statistical and presentation support. Purpose.

chinara
Download Presentation

Trevor Woodhams , MD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Limitations with Vision for Near, Distance, and Social Activities:A Comparison Among Three Models of Presbyopia-Correcting IOLs Trevor Woodhams, MD Financial Disclosure: Alcon sponsored the study and provided statistical and presentation support.

  2. Purpose • To evaluate limitations with vision for near, distance, and social activities, as reported by patients with bilateral aspheric apodized diffractive multifocal IOLs (IQ ReSTOR +3.0 D IOLs, Alcon), bilateral aspheric accommodative IOLs (Crystalens AO; Bausch & Lomb), or bilateral spherical accommodative IOLs (Crystalens HD; Bausch & Lomb).

  3. Methods • A prospective, patient-masked, multicenter study • patients with bilateral cataracts • <1.0 D of corneal astigmatism • Randomized to receive implantation of bilateral multifocal IOLs, bilateral AO IOLs, or bilateral HD IOLs • 3-mo interim results

  4. Demographics No significant between-group differences.

  5. Endpoints Evaluated • Preoperatively and at 3 months postoperative, a validated questionnaire (Cataract TyPE) was distributed • Composites scores of questions about various activities were used to assess limitations with uncorrected: • near-vision function (5 questions) • distance-vision function (7 questions) • vision for social activities (5 questions) • Response options ranged from 0 (no limitation) to 4 (extreme limitation), or could be marked as not applicable

  6. Limitations with Uncorrected Vision at Near Distance @ 3-month visit Extreme limitation Least limitation in near vision activities with the IQ ReSTOR +3.0 D IOL, followed by HD IOL, then AO IOL. Less Limitation * None *P<.02; IQ ReSTOR +3.0 D IOL had least limitation among IOLs

  7. Limitations with Uncorrected Vision at Far Distance @ 3-month visit Extreme limitation Least limitation in distance vision activities with the IQ ReSTOR +3.0 D, followed by AO IOL, then HD IOL. Less Limitation * None *P=.01; IQ ReSTOR +3.0 D IOL had least limitation among the IOLs

  8. Limitations with Uncorrected Vision during Social Activities @ 3-month visit Extreme limitation Least limitations in social activities with the IQ ReSTOR +3.0 D IOL, followed by AO IOL, then HD IOL. * * * Less Limitation None *P<.05; between-group differences favoring IQ ReSTOR +3.0 D IOL

  9. Conclusions • Three months after bilateral implantation of presbyopia-correcting IOLs, limitations with uncorrected vision for: • Near distance were least for the IQ ReSTOR+3.0 D IOL group, followed by the HD IOL group, and greatest for the AO IOL group • Far distance were least for the IQ ReSTOR +3.0 D IOL group, followed by the AO IOL group, and greatest for the HD IOL group • Social activity were least for the IQ ReSTOR +3.0 D IOL group, followed by the AO IOL group, and greatest for the HD IOL group

More Related