1 / 25

Low-Power Dynamic Voltage Scaling System

Low-Power Dynamic Voltage Scaling System. Taeg Sang Cho, Ravi Palakodety, Anantha Chandrakasan Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Outline. Introduction Speed Detector with Adaptive Delay Scheme Test Vector Generator PWM Control and Buck Converter Conclusion. Why Low Power?.

chipo
Download Presentation

Low-Power Dynamic Voltage Scaling System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Low-Power Dynamic Voltage Scaling System Taeg Sang Cho, Ravi Palakodety, Anantha Chandrakasan Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  2. Outline • Introduction • Speed Detector with Adaptive Delay Scheme • Test Vector Generator • PWM Control and Buck Converter • Conclusion

  3. Why Low Power?

  4. How does the power numbers look? Courtesy of Wikipedia

  5. Possible Optimization Space • Software • Simple Program Code (algorithm) • Efficient Compiler Technology • Hardware • Efficient Circuit Synthesis Tools • Low Power Circuit Techniques

  6. Key Metric: Energy per Operation Off-current Delay per operation Switched capacitance Metric of Interest Lowering VDD will reduce the energy per operation, but will increase the delay per operation, thus incursa reliability penalty!

  7. D Q D Q Dynamic Voltage Scaling (DVS) VDD = 1.2V LOGIC CLK

  8. D Q D Q Dynamic Voltage Scaling (DVS) VDD = 0.3V LOGIC CLK Functionality Error!

  9. Dynamic Voltage Scaling • For fixed throughput applications, minimize energy/sample in circuits. • Adjust the power supply voltage to finish critical circuit operations “just-in-time”.

  10. System Block Diagram 1.2 V VDD Power Supply(DC-DC Conv) Circuit of Interest Speed Detector(Critical Path replica) System of interest in this presentation

  11. Challenges of DVS • Highly efficient DC-DC converter • Low Overhead DVS control • Ensure that replica tracks real critical path in light of Threshold Voltage variations

  12. Outline • Introduction • Speed Detector with Adaptive Delay Scheme • Test Vector Generator • PWM Control and Buck Converter • Conclusion

  13. Delay Variation in advanced CMOS In 65nm CMOS Processes, the delay variation in circuits poses an challenge

  14. Adaptive Delay Scheme Run at startup to match delay of replica and real path

  15. Outline • Introduction • Speed Detector with Adaptive Delay Scheme • Test Vector Generator • PWM Control and Buck Converter • Conclusion

  16. Test-Vector Generator

  17. New Test-Vector Generator • We have a 50kHz clock for Accumulator!

  18. Simulation Result • Power Dissipation = 546 nW • at FEXT=25MHz • Vector generator in Kuroda’s Paper • (JSSC 1998) • Power Dissipation = 2.72uW • at FEXT= 25MHz • (Simulated at 65nm process node)

  19. Outline • Introduction • Speed Detector with Adaptive Delay Scheme • Test Vector Generator • PWM Control and Buck Converter • Conclusion

  20. PWM Controller

  21. Regulated Voltage

  22. Power Dissipation in the System

  23. System Specification with a Benchmark

  24. Conclusion • Contribution • Implementation of Energy Efficient DVS System for Low-Power Applications : 6.4X Improvements in Power Compared with Similar Type Systems • Future work • Improvement in Loop Transient Response • Reduction in DLL Power Consumption • Continuous Adaptive-delay Element (e.g. DLL)

  25. Reference [1] Variable Supply-Voltage Scheme for Low-Power High-Speed CMOS Digital Design Kuroda et al. IEEE JSSC 1998 [2] High-Efficiency Multiple-Output DC-DC Conversion for Low-Voltage Systems Dancy et al. IEEE. Trans VLSI 2000

More Related