1 / 49

NEUTRON SKIN AND GIANT RESONANCES

NEUTRON SKIN AND GIANT RESONANCES. Shalom Shlomo. Cyclotron Institute. Texas A&M University. Outline. Introduction Isovector giant dipole resonance, Giant resonances (GR) and bulk properties of nuclei Experimental and theoretical approaches for GR

cian
Download Presentation

NEUTRON SKIN AND GIANT RESONANCES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NEUTRON SKIN AND GIANT RESONANCES Shalom Shlomo Cyclotron Institute Texas A&M University

  2. Outline • Introduction • Isovector giant dipole resonance, • Giant resonances (GR) and bulk properties of nuclei • Experimental and theoretical approaches for GR • Hadron excitation of giant resonances • Hartree-Fock plus Random Phase Approximation (RPA) • Density dependence of symmetry energy and neutron skin • A study within the Energy Density Functional Approach (EDF) • 4. Giant resonances and symmetry energy density • ISGMR—Incompressibility and Symmetry energy • IVGDR and ISGMR in Ca isotopes • 5.Nuclear + Coulomb excitations of GR and neutron skin • 6. Conclusions

  3. The isovector giant dipole resonance The total photoabsorption cross-section for 197Au, illustrating the absorption of photons on a giant resonating electric dipole state. The solid curve show a Breit-Wigner shape. (Bohr and Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, vol. 2, 1975).

  4. Macroscopic picture of giant resonances L = 0 L = 2 L = 1

  5. Ψf χf VαN α Nucleus χi Ψi Hadron excitation of giant resonances Theorists: calculate transition strength S(E) within HF-RPA using a simple scattering operator F ~ rLYLM: Experimentalists: calculate cross sections within Distorted Wave Born Approximation (DWBA): or using folding model.

  6. DWBA-Folding model description

  7. Hartree-Fock with Skyrme interaction For the nucleon-nucleon interaction we adopt the standard Skyrme type interaction are 10 Skyrme parameters.

  8. Carry out the minimization of energy, we obtain the HF equations:

  9. Hartree-Fock (HF) - Random Phase Approximation (RPA) In fully self-consistent calculations: 1) Assume a form of Skyrme interaction ( - type). 2) Carry out HF calculations for ground states and determine the Skyrme parameters by a fit to binding energies and radii. 3) Determine the particle-hole interaction, 4) Carry out RPA calculations of the strength function, transition density, etc.

  10. Giant Resonance In the Green’s Function formulation of RPA, one starts with the RPA-Green’s function which is given by where Vphis the particle-hole interaction and the free particle-hole Green’s function is defined as where φi is the single-particle wave function, єiis the single-particle energy, and ho is the single-particle Hamiltonian.

  11. We use the scattering operator F obtain the strength function and the transition density. is consistent with the strength in

  12. Density dependence of symmetry energy and Neutron skin within EDF E.Friedman and S. Shlomo, Z. Phyzik, A283, 67 (1977) The energy density functional is decomposed as Where ρnand ρp are the density distributions of neutrons and protons respectively, and

  13. For the Coulomb energy density, εc, one usually uses the form where the first term is the direct Coulomb term with Vc(r) given by

  14. For the symmetry energy density, εsym, we assume the form The interaction V1(r) is taken to be of the form where ρm(r) is the nuclear matter density distribution, ρ0=0.165 fm-3. In accordance with the semiemperical mass formula we impose the constraint The terms with a2, a3, and a4 have been used previously in nuclear matter calculations and in applications of the EDF to finite nuclei.

  15. Considering now the constraint We introduce a Lagrange multiplier λ and minimize using δρm=δρp+δρn=0.

  16. We obtain with where Vc(r) and V1(r) are given by previous equations.

  17. The EDF is not known for low density. Thus the variational equation for ρ1(r) must be used only in an internal region r<RM where RM is a prescribed matching radius. For r > RM the resulting ρn(r) and ρp(r) should be positive and decay exponentially with r. Taking RM=R, then for the internal region, r < R, we have where,

  18. For the external region, r > R, we choose where the coefficients C and γ are determined by imposing (i) the continuity of the densities and (ii) the total normalizations A surface enhancement parameter y is defined by

  19. Values of rn-rp Parameterization calculations have been made for 48Ca and 208Pb using a parabolic Fermi for the proton distribution, with c=3.74 fm, a=0.53 fm and ω=-0.03, leading to rp = 3.482 fm for 48Ca, and c=6.66 fm, a=0.50 fm and ω=0 leading to rp = 5.483 fm for 208Pb

  20. Giant Resonances and Symmetry Energy ISGMR --Incompressibility and symmetry energy ISGMR in Ca isotopes IVGDR in Ca isotopes and symmetry energy

  21. Fully self-consistent HF-RPA results for ISGMR centroid energy (in MeV) with the Skyrme interaction SK255, SGII and KDE0 and compared with the RRPA results using the NL3 interaction. Note the coressponding values of the nuclear matter incompressibility, K, and the symmetry energy , J, coefficients. ω1-ω2 is the range of excitation energy. The experimental data are from TAMU.

  22. Nuclear and Coulomb Excitations of Giant Resonances Neutron skin and nuclear excitation of IVGDR by alpha (T=0) scattering Interference between Nuclear and Coulomb excitations of GR and neutron skin

  23. Definitions: Assuming uniform density distributions For:

  24. For Isovector Dipole (T=1, L=1) oscillations; CoM: g = -Z/A for a neutron and N/A for a proton. Transition density and transition potential are:

  25. For a proton projectile the transition potential is: With Note: Un and Up are of different geometry

  26. And Expanding the ground state densities: Where,

  27. We obtain for a proton projrectile

  28. For excitaion of IVGDR by a proton: With

  29. For excitaion of IVGDR by an alpha particle (T=0), adding the contributions of the two neutron and two protons, we have Note that;

  30. For excitaion of ISGMR by an alpha particle;

  31. CONCLUSIONS • Fully self-consistent HF-based RPA calculations of the ISGMR lead to K = 210-250 MeV with uncertainty due to the uncertaint in the symetry energy density. • The neutron skin depends strongly on the density dependence of the symmetry energy. • The dependence of the centroid energy of the Isovector giant dipole resonance is clouded by the effects of (i) momentum dependence of the interaction (ii) the spin-orbit interaction. • Interference between Nuclear and Coulomb excitations of GR can be used to determine the depependence of neutron skin on N-Z. • Accurate determination of the magnitude of the neutron skin in neutron rich nuclei is very much need.

More Related