1 / 28

Today 1. Presentation 2. Break 3. Discussion of Readings 4. Assignment 1 CSR Symbols

Today 1. Presentation 2. Break 3. Discussion of Readings 4. Assignment 1 CSR Symbols. Session I CSR Concepts & Frameworks Cyrlene Claasen cyrlene.claasen@esc-rennes.fr. Content CSR Definitions Related Concepts Drivers of CSR Carroll’s Theoretical Framework

cissy
Download Presentation

Today 1. Presentation 2. Break 3. Discussion of Readings 4. Assignment 1 CSR Symbols

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Today 1. Presentation 2. Break 3. Discussion of Readings 4. Assignment 1 CSR Symbols

  2. Session I CSR Concepts & Frameworks Cyrlene Claasen cyrlene.claasen@esc-rennes.fr

  3. Content CSR Definitions Related Concepts Drivers of CSR Carroll’s Theoretical Framework General Framework

  4. Academic (1) • Friedman (1962) • There is one and only one social responsibility for business – to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud • Only individuals can have social responsibilities • Social progress (e.g. health, longevity, etc.) is a consequence of free enterprise and free trade 1 – CSR Definitions

  5. 1 – CSR Definitions • Academic (2) • Carroll (1979) • The social responsibility of business encompasses the • 1) economic, • 2) legal, • 3) ethical and • 4) discretionary • expectations that society has of organizations at a given point in time

  6. 1 – CSR Definitions • Academic (3) • Porter & Kramer (2006) • Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage • and Corporate Social Responsibility, Harvard Business Review • The shared value model: idea that corporate success and social • welfare are interdependent • –Businesses needs an educated workforce, sustainable resources and a robust government to compete effectively, whereas • –Society needs profitable and competitive businesses to create jobs, income, tax revenues, and wealth for all • The “Creating Shared Value” approach (CSV) focuses on • building a social value proposition into corporate strategy • Examples of companies linking strategy and CSR in the article

  7. 1 – CSR Definitions • Academic (4) • Epstein (2008) • CSR relates primarily to achieving outcomes from organizational decisions concerning specific issues or problems, which by some normative standard have • beneficial rather than adverse effects upon pertinent corporate stakeholders • The normative correctness of the products of corporate • action have been the main focus of CSR …

  8. 1 – CSR Definitions • International Institutions (1) • European Commission (MEMO/09/109 issued on 16/03/2009) • CSR is “a concept whereby companies integrate social and • environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis” • This approach is consistent with the EU's so-called Lisbon Strategy • “CSR is always about going beyond the law” • “Ideally, CSR is a win-win scenario, whereby companies increase their profitability and society benefits at the same time”

  9. 1 – CSR Definitions • International Institutions (2) • World Bank (WB) • [CSR is] the commitment of business to contribute to sustainable economic development, working with • – employees, • – their families, • – the local community and • – society at large • to improve quality of life in ways that are both • good for business and good for development

  10. 1 – CSR Definitions • Networks (1) • International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) • CSR should be seen as the way that firms – working • with those most affected by their decisions (often • called “stakeholders”) – can develop innovative and economically viable products, processes and services within core business processes, resulting in improved environmental protection and social conditions ...

  11. 1 – CSR Definitions • Networks (2) • ASEAN’s CSR Network • (Association of South-East Asian Nations) • CSR requires a legal framework that promotes openness, partnerships and democratization • Aim: to help bring about shared prosperity and a sustainable future to the ASEAN region (Brunei, Burma / Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam); to promote community building by promoting close collaboration among the business sector, civil society, academia and other stakeholders in the region

  12. 1 – CSR Definitions • Networks (3) • UNIDO’s Regional CSR Network • (United Nations Industrial Development Organization) • Ensures that CSR supports, and does not undermine, the development of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) in developing countries as it is crucial for meeting the goal of improving the impact of business on society

  13. 1 – CSR Definitions • Example of a Company Website • Bloomberg Businessweek: • Corporate social responsibility is a way of managing a business by considering the impact of activities on • – customers, • – suppliers, • – employees, • – shareholders, • – communities and other stakeholders, and • – the environment

  14. 1 – CSR Definitions • Questions • Can you identify some major differences between all these definitions? • Are there common points shared by all of them? • What are the possible problems related to having such a vast array of CSR definitions? • Taking into consideration the geographic region where you come from, which would be the most relevant one?

  15. 2 – Related Concepts • Responsibility / Responsiveness • Corporate social responsibility– emphasizes obligation and accountability to society • Corporate social responsiveness– emphasizes action, activity • Corporate social responsiveness is a business's capacity to respond to social pressures • This suggests the ability of a business organization to survive through adaptation to its business environment • The term is an inclusive and global concept which embraces the complete spectrum of socially beneficial activities of business

  16. 2 – Related Concepts • Corporate Social Performance: • Principles, Processes and Outcomes • Wood, 1991: • Corporate social performance is “a business organization’s configuration of principles of social responsibility, processes of social responsiveness, and policies, programs and other observable outcomes as they relate to the firm’s societal relationships” • This definition was further developed so that each of the three components – principles, processes and outcomes – are each composed of specific elements

  17. 2 – Related Concepts • The problem of the CSP – FP link • (Corporate Social Performance – Financial Performance) • Does it pay to be ethical? We don’t know • Whereas some studies report a positive relationship between ethics and profits, some find a negative relationship and some find the relationship either neutral or mixed • It is hard to draw broad conclusions about the relationship between CSR and profits because the studies often measure different things; Margolis and Walsh (2001) have shown in their summary of 95 studies that CSP is measured in many different ways • There might be a correlation between CSP and FP, but the existence of a causal link has not been proved • McWilliams & Siegel (2001) find that there is a neutral relationship between CSR and FP

  18. 3 – Drivers of CSR • Legitimacy (1) • The legitimacy of business is linked to its obligations to society and to the sanctions that society can apply to business when it fails to live up to these obligations • The most often cited definition is that of Suchman (1995):  “Legitimacy is a generalized perception or assumption that the actions of an entity are desirable, proper, or appropriate within some socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions”

  19. 3 – Drivers of CSR • Legitimacy (2) • According to the “Iron Law of Responsibility” (Davis): • Economic power entails social responsibility • Society grants legitimacy and power to business; • in the long run, those who do not use power in a manner which society considers responsible will lose it • However, some challenge this view because defining • the terms of legitimacy as a contested process and the • norms of legitimacy are an outcome of power relations

  20. 3 – Drivers of CSR • License to Operate • It isusually seen as the approval that companies must obtain from local communities or other stakeholders in areas where they operate (as compared to the legal license they must • obtain from governments) •  CSR policies, projects or initiatives do help to obtain the social licence to operate • It is crucial notably for extractive industries, which often directly impact local communities by exploiting their land, subsoil, and other resources •  A “social licence to operate” is earned by acquiring free, prior and informed consent from indigenous peoples and local communities

  21. 3 – Drivers of CSR • Image / Reputation (1) • The implementation of a CSR approach usually enhances the brand image and reputation of a business • Consequently, over time, it leads to an improvement in sales and customer loyalty • And it also leads to an increased ability to attract and retain (the best) employees •  By capitalizing on it, a company can improve its financial performance and attract more investments

  22. 3 – Drivers of CSR • Image / Reputation (2) • However, companies are often accused of instrumentalizing CSR to improve their image or reputation • There are serious dangers associated with paying lip service to stakeholders and considering CSR as a mere PR exercise • (“greenwashing”, “window dressing”…) • This may cause a loss in credibility and destroy very quickly the company’s image • Whereas building a good reputation takes a long time, tarnishing it is a matter of days or hours…

  23. 3 – Drivers of CSR • Image / Reputation (3) • “Greenwashing” happens when disinformation is disseminated by an organization so as to present a (false) environmentally responsible image of itself • Making exaggerated environmental claims in order to obtain consumer favor is one of the worst things a company can do in the eyes of the sustainability community • When a company that has been lauded for its environmental performance is revealed to be engaging in environmentally dangerous practices, it provides skeptics with the fodder they need.  Can you think of an example? • Even when the claims are found to be inflated (or impossible to substantiate), credibility is lost

  24. 3 – Drivers of CSR • Workplace Issues • Research demonstrates that CSR initiatives have a positive impact on employee morale, motivation, commitment, loyalty, training, recruitment and turnover •  Benefits in these areas have been found to improve the bottom line of companies •  Three surveys across Europe, the USA and a survey involving 25 countries found employees felt greater loyalty, satisfaction and motivation when their companies were socially responsible

  25. 3 – Drivers of CSR • Risk reduction • Companies with non-sustainable supply chains may experience financial, integrity and reputation issues • (e.g. Mattel in 2007 when a supplier used lead-contaminated paint on toys) •  Green procurement strategies • Purchasing of green energy, raw materials with a higher • recycled content, etc. •  “Greening the supply chain” • refers to buyer companies requiring a certain level of environmental responsibility in the core business practices of their suppliers and vendors

  26. 3 – Drivers of CSR • Reduced internal costs • And revenue growth • Energy efficiency, green projects and other eco-friendly initiatives • Implementation of sustainable practices in design, production, distribution and end-of-life management • Enhanced brand reputation • Employee motivation • Customer satisfaction •  All these policies, processes and outcomes guarantee savings and increase cost avoidance

  27. 4 – Carroll’s CSR Pyramid

  28. 5 – General Framework

More Related