1 / 23

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACILITIES PLAN: 1998 - 2007

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACILITIES PLAN: 1998 - 2007. TEN-YEAR PLAN: MID-POINT STATUS FISCAL YEAR 2002 Presentation to the Council of Deans Robert F. Pack January 24, 2002. Office of the Provost. “Space – The Final Frontier” Captain James T. Kirk. 1996 UNIVERSITY SPACE TOTALS.

clare-britt
Download Presentation

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACILITIES PLAN: 1998 - 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHFACILITIES PLAN: 1998 - 2007 TEN-YEAR PLAN: MID-POINT STATUS FISCAL YEAR 2002 Presentation to theCouncil of Deans Robert F. Pack January 24, 2002 Office of the Provost

  2. “Space – The Final Frontier”Captain James T. Kirk 1996 UNIVERSITY SPACE TOTALS PITTSBURGH CAMPUS 9,775,000 GSF REGIONAL CAMPUSES 1,625,000 GSF TOTAL UNIVERSITY SPACE 11,400,000 GSF

  3. FALL 1996 - COST OF OPERATIONPITTSBURGH CAMPUS Pittsburgh Campus Building Total 51 Replacement Cost $869,000,000 Annual Payment from E&G For Debt Service $8,330,000 Annual Cost to the University E&G Budget for Operation and Maintenance $31,500,000 Annual O&M Cost per square foot $5.73

  4. FALL 1996 - COMPREHENSIVE FACILITIES ASSESSMENT - PITTSBURGH CAMPUS Resulting Building Conditions: Poor Condition 28 Fair Condition 13 Good Condition 10 Cost to restore to original condition $ 98,000,000 Cost to upgrade to contemporary condition $461,000,000

  5. GUIDING PRINCIPLES • Academic priorities guide capital development • Utilize existing space effectively and efficiently • Preservation should precede new construction • High priority to Admissions and the Library • Improving instructional facilities is critical • Recreation facilities, student life, student services space, and housing are a priority • The Cathedral of Learning should house more academic activities • Rental properties should house externally funded projects for a limited time

  6. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS – 1996TOTAL UNIVERSITY Short-Term FY 98 – FY 01 $267,621,000 Mid-Term FY 02 – FY 04 154,725,250 Long-Term FY 05 – FY 07 93,514,000 TOTAL $515,860,250 Estimated increase in E&G debt service $16,210,562 Estimated increase in E&G operating costs $ 5,673,600

  7. Mid-Point Status (FY 98 – FY 02) Project Summary – Total University FACILITIES PLAN CAPITAL BUDGETS Preservation $32,850,000 $66,752,862 Programmatic 18,980,000 27,804,267 Academic Priorities 85,129,000 79,189,495 Classroom Renovations 8,650,000 11,984,000 Athletic/Recreation 82,052,000 87,400,000 Housing 36,136,000 31,028,673 School of Medicine 54,041,000 109,391,792 TOTAL $317,838,000 $413,551,089 FY 98 – FY 02

  8. Mid-Point Status (FY 98 – FY 02) Funding Source – Total University FACILITIES PLAN CAPITAL BUDGETS E&G Debt $109,442,000 $119,408,667 Commonwealth 69,000,000 134,742,140 Gift/Other 50,695,000 51,251,241 School of Medicine 46,042,000 75,168,353 Auxiliaries 42,659,000 32,980,688 Total $317,838,000 $413,551,089 FY 98 – FY 02

  9. Mid-Point Status (FY 98 – FY 02)PRESERVATION PROJECTS FY 98 – 02 FACILITIES PLAN CAPITAL BUDGETS $32,850,000 $66,752,862* Priority Level I$6,000,000 per year (FY98- FY01) Priority Levels II $8,850,000 per year (FY 02 – 07)

  10. Mid-Point Status (FY 98 – FY 02) PROGRAMMATIC RENOVATIONS FY 98 – 02 FACILITIES PLAN CAPITAL BUDGETS $18,980,000 $27,804,267 Pittsburgh Campus Programmatic Renovations$15,000,000 ($3,000,000 per year) Regional Campuses Preservation/Renovation $ 3,980,000

  11. Mid-Point Status (FY 98 – FY 02)CLASSROOM RENOVATIONS FY 98 – FY 01 FACILITIES PLAN CAPITAL BUDGETS $8,650,000 $11,984,000 Total Seats Pittsburgh Campus Classrooms 288 15,282 Classrooms Renovated FY 98 – FY 02 56 5,399 Classrooms Renovated FY 93 – FY 97 55 3,776 Total 111 9,175 % of Total Renovated % of Seats Renovated 39%59%

  12. Mid-Point Status (FY 98 – FY 02) ACADEMIC PRIORITIES • Renovation of Masonic Temple to house high-priority programs • Continuation of a systematic classroom renovation project • Construction of the Multi-purpose Academic Complex • Renovate Hillman Library and provide high-density storage and expansion space for Hillman Library

  13. Mid-Point Status (FY 98 – FY 02) ATHLETICS AND RECREATION • Events Center • Fitzgerald Locker Rooms Construction • Outdoor Playing Fields Construction • Bellefield Gym Renovations • Cost Center Renovation • Towers Fitness Center • Schenley Quad Fitness Center • Bellefield Fitness Center • Bellefield Pool

  14. Mid-Point Status (FY 98 – FY 02) HOUSING • Forbes-Craig, Mayflower/Oakwood Apartment Conversion to Undergraduate Housing • Housing Construction Phase I (200 Beds) • Fraternity Housing • Regional Campus Housing • Housing/Dining Renovations – All Campuses # Beds 1996 # Beds 2002 4,995 6,015

  15. Mid-Point Status (FY 98 – FY 02) • New Building Projects Total GSF Added to Inventory 896,500 GSF • Buildings Demolished: Total GSF Removed from Inventory129,182 GSF • Annual Rental Costs Recovered $180,000

  16. Mid-Point Status (FY 98 – FY 02)CURRENT SPACE TOTALS 1996 2002 GSF GSF PITTSBURGH CAMPUS 9,775,000 10,753,672 REGIONAL CAMPUSES 1,625,000 1,675,345 TOTAL UNIVERSITY 11,400,000 12,429,017

  17. Mid-Point Status (FY 98 – FY 02)CURRENT COSTS 19962002 Replacements Cost $896,000,000 $932,000,000 Annual Payment From E&G for Debt Service $8,330,000 $17,500,000 Annual Cost to the University E&G Budget for Operation and Maintenance $31,500,000 $36,243,000 Annual O&M Cost per Square Foot $5.73 $5.78

  18. Mid-Point Status (FY 98 – FY 02)Project Cost Summary • Grand Total Ten-Year Plan $515,000,000 • Projects Completed First 5 Years $317,000,000* • Additional Projects Completed First 5 years $96,000,000 • Projects Remaining $198,000,000 *Represents an acceleration of the plan - not a deviation from the plan.

  19. THE NEXT FIVE YEARS (FY 03 - 07) Project Summary – Total University FACILITIES PLAN Preservation $ 44,265,083 Programmatic 16,356,000 Academic Priorities 48,000,000 Classroom Renovations 6,617,834 Athletic/Recreation 41,400,000 Housing 5,050,000 School of Medicine 36,333,333 TOTAL $198,022,250

  20. THE NEXT FIVE YEARS (FY 03 - 07) Funding Source – Total University FACILITIES PLAN E&G Debt $112,738,917 Commonwealth 41,900,000 Gift/Other 2,000,000 School of Medicine 36,333,333 Auxiliaries 5,050,000 Total $198,022,250

  21. MOVING FORWARD “The Facilities Plan, like any planning document, must adapt and change in response to opportunities and circumstances.” University of Pittsburgh Ten-Year Facility Plan (1998 – 2007) The challenge, as always, is to balance known existing needs against perceived potential opportunities.

  22. MOVING FORWARD The context in which the Facilities Plan was created has not fundamentally changed. • The emphasis on the establishment of clear priorities to guide renovations and construction must remain high • The principles on which those priorities were based remain appropriate and should guide the establishment of priorities • The emphasis on preserving and renovating existing space, on enhancing the quality of instructional space, and on improving the quality of student life should remain preeminent • The ability to respond to programmatic opportunities by having flexible resources to renovate facilities is crucial

  23. MOVING FORWARD The opportunities and competitive environment have changed and must be taken into account. • Students needs and desires change and must be regularly assessed and responded to • Academic programs evolve and instructional methodologies change • Programs compete for students, faculty, and resources, and must have the facilities to be able to compete successfully • The external research environment is changing rapidly, putting existing facilities under considerable stress

More Related