1 / 13

Stephen Gill York University, Toronto, Canada

Stephen Gill York University, Toronto, Canada. “After Bush”: RLF 10 November 2008 Panel 1: What’s next? Politics in the USA after the elections. America & the world: key questions.

clem
Download Presentation

Stephen Gill York University, Toronto, Canada

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Stephen GillYork University, Toronto, Canada • “After Bush”: RLF 10 November 2008 • Panel 1: What’s next? Politics in the USA after the elections.

  2. America & the world: key questions My assumption is that US domestic politics has global implications – the Presidency of the USA is by definition an “imperial Presidency”. Thus my key questions are: • What is the legacy of the Bush years? • What has changed in US politics & what is likely to be new with an Obama Presidency?

  3. Q1: Legacy of Bush • Bush Presidency needs to be understood in a longer term & wider context. • USA has led a strategy of global redistribution to benefit the affluent & the plutocracy & to weaken the left & other sources of opposition • Bush strategy sought to lock in these gains by means of 3 aspects of domestic & foreign policy: • war on terror & state of emergency • disciplinary neo-liberalism - G7 strategy • full spectrum dominance - Pentagon

  4. Disciplinary neo-liberalism • Program of the G-7 led by the USA since early 1980s. • Uses discipline of market forces for the majority, but tax breaks & socialization of risk ( “corporate welfare”) for the strong. • Locked in legally in some countries e.g. the EU Maastricht agreements that – so far at least – have limited permissible government debts. • Involves de-politicization of opposition by rendering social problems into individual questions – promoting the “self help” society + punitive methods of order, esp. in USA. • Main beneficiaries: plutocracy of billionaires; big business, especially in energy, finance + associated consultancies, lobbyists + members of celebrity culture.

  5. Full Spectrum Dominance and US Military Strategy • 1997 Pentagon strategy document that promulgated the concept of “full spectrum dominance” maintained into the future through “full force integration”. • Goal was to sustain US superiority by synergizing military technologies on land, sea, and air and in space. • Its objective: to protect “US national interests and investments”, not only from traditional rivals, but also from new challenges including those stemming from “a widening between ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’” (US Space Command 1997). • Involves more than war in Iraq or Bush war on terrorism/ strategy of pre-emption and regime change.

  6. The US Global Military Footprint:An Empire of Bases By 2007 US has approx. 1,000 military bases around the globe; 6000 in US and US territories. Possibly 6 new bases constructed in Iraq Since September 2001 US forces have built/upgraded/expanded military facilities in Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Turkey, Bulgaria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. US will maintain its bases in its main allies such as Japan & Korea to offset China

  7. Q2: What has changed in US politics? • What type of change does Obama represent? • What are his priorities? • A question of hegemony • What about US military policies?

  8. “Obama is the change” Obama has changed the way that US politics operates • Mobilizes powerful fund-raising & organizational machine that draws on Silicon Valley & internet-based social networking • A new type of political force –not a “party of a new type” - the Lefts can learn a lot from this • Obama feels “no pressure” to select a cabinet that reflects “change”. “Obama is the change” says a campaign official, “Right now what America is looking for is competence, expertise and credibility” (Financial Times, 7 November 2008). His choice for Secretary of Treasury? • Obama Chief of Staff is Rahm Emmanuel, former Clinton Advisor – then worked as investment banker for 3 years & earned $16 million; elected to Congress 2003 “where he rose quickly because of his fund-raising skills in Wall Street and Hollywood”.

  9. Obama: a question of hegemony • Obama provides a means to regenerate hegemony for the US ruling classes --- Gramsci: hegemony = consent armoured in coercion. The reconstruction of consent: • Legitimates the US constitutional order – 64% turnout highest since 1908 with strategy of cross-party alliance or “bipartisanship”. • Will seek to help rescue US capitalism by means of a more compensatory version of neo-liberalism & avoid a deeper economic slump – Bush bailout of Wall Street = $750 billion; Obama proposes $100-200 billion in public works & redistribution. It may help states to avoid public sector layoffs, some help to distressed home owners is likely – a solution less skewed towards the wealthy • May support changes in US labour law to make union organization easier -- will be opposed by corporations

  10. The financial crash of 2008: Obama’s # 1 priority • G7 political leaders ignored problems financial liberalization and deregulation. • After years of preaching the virtues of sound money and fiscal prudence and cutbacks in social benefits announce perhaps $5 trillion dollars in bailouts paid for by public funds • Obama’s principal economic advisor states the #1 priority is to avoid another great depression – as in the 1930s. • Opportunity costs – alternatives foregone: what could this gigantic sum be otherwise spent on? Better schools, public transport, health care, social provisions?

  11. Obama Foreign Policy • Obama will seek to restore US leadership abroad, where possible via co-optation of opposition -- e.g. some argue it will now be difficult for European leaders to say no to putting military in Afghanistan. • Obama is more of a multilateralist & closer to what used to be called Rockefeller Republicans such as Paul Volcker – we can expect to see more support for international organizations & global co-ordination of prudential financial regulation • Joseph Nye (Harvard & Chair of Trilateral Commission): "I think Barack Obama would do wonders for America's soft power." Revitalization of US cultural imperialism? • Obama is very methodical and targets his efforts in very precise ways – his use of surveillance & networking power will also capitalize on his media links.

  12. Hegemony = Consent armoured in coercion • Obama will continue US efforts to attain Full Spectrum Dominance + expand its “global” military “footprint” (its empire of bases, proxy forces, militarization of space) • Will increase “Special Forces“ ie US capacities for rapid intervention. E.g. Obama has supported the addition of 65,000 troops to the Army and 27,000 to the Marines + build more C-17 cargo planes and KC-X refueling aircraft • Obama has called for increased spending on electronic warfare capabilities to enhance America's "future ability to extend its global power." • Plans to "recapitalize“ US naval forces "to patrol ocean "choke points" & protect oil supplies, esp in Middle East

  13. A final hypothesis • Obama represents a possibility to restore the credibility of ruling class power in the USA after Bush by making the minimum necessary concessions and changes in policy • Lampedusa’s il Gattopardo (1958) • As Garibaldi’s revolutionaries invaded Sicily in 1860, the aristocrat Prince Tancredi observed: “Unless we ourselves take a hand now, they will force a republic on us. If we want things to stay as they are, things will have to change”

More Related