1 / 18

DTL & CCDTL (& PIMS?) EMQs

DTL & CCDTL (& PIMS?) EMQs. Th. Zickler CERN. Outlook. History Requirements and constraints Proposed quadrupole layout Magnet field characteristics Power requirements Dynamic behaviour Eddy currents Conclusions and next steps. History. Baseline:

collin
Download Presentation

DTL & CCDTL (& PIMS?) EMQs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DTL & CCDTL (& PIMS?) EMQs Th. Zickler CERN

  2. Outlook • History • Requirements and constraints • Proposed quadrupole layout • Magnet field characteristics • Power requirements • Dynamic behaviour • Eddy currents • Conclusions and next steps

  3. History Baseline: A common quad type for entire Linac (DTL, CCDTL, SCL) Beginning 2007: 2 Quad types combined with steerer (DTL, CCDTL & PIMS) due to restricted space End 2008: One common quad type for entire Linac (DTL, CCDTL, PIMS) and separate steerers Summer 2009: Review: further space restrictions require new solutions; management proposal to replace CCDTL intertank EMQs with PMQs

  4. Design Requirements and Constraints General common requirements: • Operation modes: • Linac4 operation: 1 Hz, 400 µs stable flat top • Low Power SPL operation: 2 Hz, 1000 µs stable flat top • Power converter: • Fast pulsed power converters (200 A / 1000 V) • Maximum flat top duration: 2 ms • Eddy currents? Flat top stability (1000 ppm) • Restricted space: • allows only air cooling (natural convection) • Limited current densities (< 2 A/mm2) • Field quality: • Field homogeneity inside GFR: < 5*10-3

  5. Design Requirements and Constraints DTL specific requirements: • 2 quadrupoles • Restricted space: • in particular intertank DTL 1-2 • Overall length: < 106 mm • Width: no severe restrictions • Pick-up inside magnet: • Aperture radius: 20 mm  27 mm • Magnetic field requirements: • Max. integrated field gradient: 2.2 T

  6. Design Requirements and Constraints CCDTL specific requirements: • 14 + 7 quadrupoles • Restricted space: • in particular intertank • Overall length: < 198 mm (?) • Overall radius: < 112 (140) mm • Aperture: • Radius: 20 mm • Magnetic field requirements: • Max. integrated field gradient: 1.8 T No CCDTL prototype drawing available

  7. Design Requirements and Constraints PIMS specific requirements: • 12 quadrupoles • Restricted space: • Similar to DTL • Overall length: < 106 mm (?) • Width: no severe restrictions • Aperture: • Radius: 20 mm • Magnetic field requirements: • Max. integrated field gradient: 1.7 T

  8. Design Requirements and Constraints Summary (‘smallest common denominator’): • 35 quadrupoles • Restricted space: • Overall length: < 106 mm • Overall radius: < 112 (140) mm • Aperture: • Radius: 27 mm • Magnetic field requirements: • Max. integrated field gradient: 2.2 T

  9. Proposed Quadrupole Layout

  10. Magnetic Field Quality Goodfieldradius: 18 mm 2D fieldquality (gradient): +5*10-3 / -7*10-3

  11. Magnetic Field Quality Magnetic Field Quality

  12. 3D Design

  13. Power Requirements

  14. Dynamic Behavior Linac4 Ramp time: 500µs dI/dt: 180 kA/s Stable flat top: 400µs Low Power SPL Ramp time: 200µs dI/dt: 450 kA/s Stable flat top: 1000µs

  15. Eddy Currents Ramp time: 500 µs Material: 316 LN Wall thickness: 2 mm Eddy currents in vacuumchamber and pick-up

  16. Eddy Currents Time constant: < 50µs Stable (< 10-3) after 100 µs No significant heating

  17. Conclusions and Next Steps • Solution found: one design for all Linac parts • Proposed design fullfills the requirements and constraints, in particular the required dimensional limitations • No problems from eddy currents in vacuum chamber and PU expected • Total flat top of 2 ms required for field stability

  18. Conclusions and Next Steps • Clarification needed: • Available space (DTL, CCDTL, PIMS) • Confirmation of aperture size • Pick-up design • Power converter: inductance, ramp rate, voltage....? • Interference with other equipment • Next steps: • Layout integration • Pole optimization • 3D calculations to study end field effects (shims) • Possible field distortions

More Related