1 / 10

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission T itle: [802.11n liaison rep

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission T itle: [802.11n liaison report to Working Group 802.15] Date Submitted: [19 March 2004] Source: [Jason Ellis] Company [Staccato Communications] Address [5893 Oberlin Dr., San Diego, CA, USA]

conlan
Download Presentation

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission T itle: [802.11n liaison rep

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [802.11n liaison report to Working Group 802.15] Date Submitted: [19 March 2004] Source: [Jason Ellis] Company [Staccato Communications] Address [5893 Oberlin Dr., San Diego, CA, USA] Voice:[(858) 642 0111], FAX: [(858) 642 0161],E-Mail:[jason@staccatocommunications.com] Re: [] Abstract: [Liaison report] Purpose: [To inform the WG on progress in 802.11n during the March 2004 session] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Jason Ellis, Staccato Communications

  2. Objectives & Status • FRCC • Functional requirements document • Previously approved as technical document obtaining 75% approval; modifications made • Comparison criteria document • Near approval, majority of week resolving comments – Approval expected in May • Simulation Scenarios Document • Comments not yet addressed – Approval expected in May • Simulation Methodology • Everyone agreed that there was nothing to agree upon for standardization – Status, abandoned • Call For Proposals (CFP) • Requires FRCC and Simulations Scenarios documents be approved • Desire is to issue CFP in May • Groups goal for 1st proposal presentations is September 04 • Numerous presentations offered to the committee Jason Ellis, Staccato Communications

  3. Additional InformationSource: 11-04-0271-01-000n-tgn-march-opening-report Jason Ellis, Staccato Communications

  4. Mon & Tues (as amended) Jason Ellis, Staccato Communications

  5. Wed & Thu (as amended) Jason Ellis, Staccato Communications

  6. New Documentsas of Sunday March 14 Jason Ellis, Staccato Communications

  7. Key Documents Key TGn Documents as of March ’04 Opening • TGn Schedule 03- 0488 r0 • TGn Selection Procedure 03-0665 r9 • Selection Procedure Minutes 03-0740 r2 • Channel Models 03-0940 r2 • Usage Models 03-0802 r10 r13 • Functional Requirements 03-0813 r9 • FRCC Cumulative Minutes 03-0815 r6 r10 • Comparison Criteria 03-0814 r13 r17 Jason Ellis, Staccato Communications

  8. FRCC Presentations - March • FRCC Report and Process for TGn Meeting Adrian Stephens 04-0261r1 • FRCC Template for Comments Adrian Stephens 04-0262r1 FRCC Items • Carrier Frequency/Symbol Clock Offset Proposal for TGn FRCC Colin Lanzl 04-0209r3 • Simple Model for Phase Noise Impairment for TGn CC Colin Lanzl 04-0224r0 • TGN FRCC Proposed new IM6 Colin Lanzl 04-0229r0 • TGN FRCC Proposed new IM7: Antenna Configuration Colin Lanzl 04-0240r0 • Simulation effort required (FRCC) Bjorn Bjerke 04-0307r0 • Comments on TGn FRCC Doc #11-03-814r17 George Vlantis 04-0302r2 • Multiple Channel Modes in a Simulation Scenario John Ketchum 04-0211r0 • Rate Adaptive Version of CC67 John Ketchum 04-0214r1 Jason Ellis, Staccato Communications

  9. Simulation Methodology Speakers Times in minutes shown [in brackets] • Sim Methodologies • 0269r0 - PHY Abstraction based on PER Prediction - Ketchum • 0218r3 - Simulation Methodology - Bruno Jechoux [45] • 0183r3 - Record and Playback method – Hemanth Sampath [25] • 0304r1 -  PER prediction for 802.11 MAC simulation - John Sadowsky [30] • Others • 0300r0 - A Comment on Black-Box adaptation for simulation methodology– Adrian Stephens • 0316r1; Comments on PHY Abstraction; John Sadowsky [10] • 0303r0; The System Issues of rate adaptation; Simulation methodology- Hujun Yin [15] Jason Ellis, Staccato Communications

  10. Technical Presentations – Submitted for March – presentationmay be delayed until May • MIMO Ant OFDM Solutions for Enhanced PHY Alexandre Dias 04-0229r0 • Turbo Codes for IEEE 802.11n Marie-Helene Hamon 04-0243r0 • 20ms Effective Preamble MIMO OFDM Seigo Nakao 04-0249r1 • PCCC Turbo Codes for 802.11n Bart Van Poucke 04-0256r0 • Number of MIMO Multiplex for 11n Standards Yusuke Asai 04-0259r0 • Field Measurements of 2 by 2 MIMO Communications Babak Daneshrad 04-0263r0 • Limitation on Range Extension using Multiple Antennas Heejung Yu 04-0279r0 • Maximizing MAC Throughputs by Dynamic RTS-CTSThreshold Woo-Yong Choi 04-0312r0 • LDPC vs. Convolutional Codes: Perf and Complexity Comparison Alexsandar Purkovic 04-0337r0 • Rate Feedback Schemes for MIMO-OFDM Stephan ten Brink 04-0372r0 Jason Ellis, Staccato Communications

More Related