Redesigning ENG 245 British Literature Chronology

1. Redesigning ENG 245 British Literature Chronology Truman State University Presented by Christine Harker and Patricia Gately, Associate Professors of English

2. Our Objectives in Redesigning • Encouraging active learning • Providing students with individualized assistance • Establishing ongoing assessment and automated feedback • Ensuring sufficient time on task and monitor student progress

3. Implementation • Lecture time reduced • 1-hour small group discussion with UGAs • Online Assessment • Supplemental Materials Online • Supplemental Discussion Online

4. Examples of Online Materials

5. Examples of Online Materials

6. Examples of Online Materials

7. Examples of Online Materials

8. Examples of Online Materials

9. Midterm Student Evaluations for Pilot Study How helpful were the following in preparing students for the midterm?

10. Midterm Student Evaluations FromFull Implementation Course How helpful were the following in preparing for the midterm?

11. Final Student Evaluations for Pilot Study How helpful were the following to overall learning?

12. Aesthetic Mode – Literature: Rubric for assessing learning • Students who successfully complete the Aesthetic Mode of Inquiry--Literature will develop and show some of the following features in their writing, observations, questions, and discussions: • 5-highest 1-lowest • 1) The ability to interpret a text by drawing on techniques of close, active, reflective reading; additionally, interpretation may include the use of primary and secondary sources and of other critical approaches • 5 4 3 2 1 • 2) The ability to analyze the formal elements, such as metaphors, analogies, etc., and relationships within a text to see how authors achieve responses in readers • 5 4 3 2 1 • 3) The ability to situate ideas within in historical, cultural or intellectual contexts, and/or the ability to address how literary studies may be informed by other disciplines and/or personal experience • 5 4 3 2 1

13. Pre-Pilot A: 13 = 29.54% B: 12 = 27.30% C: 14 = 31.80% D: 4 = 9.09% F: 1 = 2.27% 44 total students Pilot A: 19 = 43.48% B: 14 = 30.43% C: 8 = 17.39% D: 2 = 4.35% F: 2 = 4.35% 45 total students Final Grades in Pre-Pilot and Pilot

14. Pre-Implementation A: 2 = 6.06% B: 8 = 23.24% C: 19 = 57.58% D: 2 = 6.06% F: 2 = 6.06% 33 total students Implementation A: 9 = 31.03% B: 8 = 27.59% C: 11 = 37.93% D: 0 = 0% F: 1 = 3.45% 29 total students Midterm Grades in Pre-Implementation and Post-Implementation Courses

15. Pre-Pilot Strongly agree 15 Agree somewhat 16 Don’t agree or disagree 3 Disagree somewhat 2 Strongly disagree 0 Other 1 Pilot Strongly agree 17 Agree somewhat 12 Don’t agree or disagree 5 Disagree somewhat 0 Strongly disagree 1 Other 0 Comparison of Student Evaluations The course has accomplished its objectives:

16. Non-redesign Course GRAND TOTAL $18,020 Total # of students 33 Cost per student $546 Original Projected Redesign Course • GRAND TOTAL $12,240 • Total # of students 75 • Cost per student $163 Projected Cost Savings • Current Redesign Course • GRAND TOTAL $12,240 • Total # of students 30 • Cost per student $408 • Future Redesign Course • GRAND TOTAL $12, 240 • Total # of students 90 • Cost per student $136