1 / 22

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSON

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSON. ASSESSMENT OF THE MANAGEMENT OF SERVICE TERMINATIONS AND PENSION PAY-OUTS IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE NOVEMBER 2016. OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION. Legislative Mandate, role and responsibilities of PSC Problem Statement Objectives of the study Methodology Findings

corym
Download Presentation

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSON

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSON ASSESSMENT OF THE MANAGEMENT OF SERVICE TERMINATIONS AND PENSION PAY-OUTS IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE NOVEMBER 2016

  2. OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION • Legislative Mandate, role and responsibilities of PSC • Problem Statement • Objectives of the study • Methodology • Findings • Recommendations • Conclusion 2 2

  3. MANDATE, ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES • The Public Service Commission (PSC) derives its mandate from section 196 of the Constitution and the Public Service Act, which vests it with oversight responsibilities on the organisation, administration and performance of the Public Service. • The PSC is a constitutional body entrusted with the powers and functions to investigate, monitor, evaluate, propose measures, give directives, promote, advise and report on the organisation, administration, personnel practices, values and principles, effective and efficient performance of the Public Service. 3

  4. PROBLEMSTATEMENT • In the past 2/3 years, the PSC received numerous complaints from public service retirees and the beneficiaries of the deceased public service pensioners. • The complaints alluded to the delays in pension pay-outs & other related benefits by employer departments and Government Pension Administration Agency (GPAA). • The PSC also noticed a trend of complaints reported in the media, and took a decision to provide assistance where possible. Problem: There has been non-adherence to timeframes for pension pay-outs as set out in the Pension Law. The Government Employees Pension Law, 21 of 1996, as amended, stipulates that the pension pay-out should be transferred to the person concerned within 60 days after the submission of all necessary documentation. 4

  5. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY • The overall purpose of the study was to assess the management of service termination and pension pay-outs in the Public Service, and the following were the specific objectives: • To determine the underlying causes to delays in the processing of service terminations and pension pay-outs; • To identify challenges experienced and/or best practices applied in the management of service termination processes within departments; • To investigate the impact of pension pay-outs delays on the welfare of former employees of their dependents and beneficiaries; and • To investigate the role of all stakeholders, including institutions responsible for the management of pensions. 5

  6. METHODOLOGY • 40 National Departments were sampled and only 28 departments participated in this study. • 9 Provinces were sampled and only 8 provinces participated in this study, with a collective of 85 Provincial Departments that responded. • Secondary data - desktop literature and legislative frameworks reviewed. • Primary data - focused interviews were held with the following participants using semi-structured questions: • HR Practitioners responsible for service termination management in departments; • GPAA Officials responsible for the management of pension pay-outs; and • Retirees and/or their beneficiaries/dependents at the GPAA client service centre in Pretoria. 6

  7. FINDINGS Underlying causes of delays in service termination and pension pay-outs Departmental capacity • Lack of formal training (i.e. structured and planned) on service termination and pension processes for HR practitioners. • There is a heavy reliance on supervisors, experienced fellow employees and GPAA officials to conduct the on-the-job training whilst having their own workloads and also not being trainers by profession which results in them giving less attention to the “on-the-job” training that is needed. • The implications of the lack of formal training and the ad hoc “on-the-job” training is illustrated by pension application forms that are submitted to GPAA with errors, resulting in them being returned to the departments for corrections.

  8. FINDINGS Departmental management of the beneficiary profiles • Regardless of the departmental efforts to annually remind employees to update their beneficiary profiles, some employees fail to nominate legal or legitimate beneficiaries. • In some instances employees do not declare all their children and if GPAA becomes informed about them, the whole process comes to a standstill until evidence proving their paternity is presented; and that contributes to delays. • In some instances employees would nominate children who are not known to spouses, then their spouses will contest against the payments, thus lead to delays due to the legal challenges.

  9. FINDINGS Records Management • Departments are responsible for keeping all the records of an employee, while GPAA is responsible for keeping records related to pension contributions and pay-out which are submitted by departments. • There are instances where the employees’ records with the department would be in contradictory with the years of pension contribution as captured by GPAA. Such would cause some delays as the departments will be busy trying to resolve the problem. Such challenges were experienced with documentation from former TVBC States employees. • Departments’ filing systems that are not in order or unclear documents that are submitted to GPAA, have a negative effect on the pension pay-out process and timeframes.

  10. FINDINGS Customary and civil marriages disputes • Some employees who are in customary marriages would get involved in a civil marriage without the knowledge of the 2 wives - in a case of death where an employee did not update his beneficiary profile, this results in a legal battle as GPAA would require proof of the marital status of both partners. • Some employees do not nominate beneficiaries because of fear that their family members might wish them dead and/or even kill them. The downside is that in the event of death, in some instances, close and remote relatives of the deceased complicate the pay-out process by trying to claim the benefits for themselves or claim to act on behalf of ill-informed decedents and dependents. • The implications of not updating pension beneficiary forms and not sorting out issues pertaining to marriage and living arrangements by employees contribute greatly to delays in the pension pay-out.

  11. FINDINGS • Awareness of the service termination and pension pay-out processes • 68% of retirees indicated that they were aware and informed of the service termination process by their departments and were getting feedback from GPAA on progress with their applications for pension pay-out. • However, 32% of retirees who participated in the study stated that they were not informed by their departments nor the GPAA about the progress of the pay-out processes and the challenges that might be encountered - they only became aware when they were experiencing delays in receiving their pension pay-outs. • The lack of awareness of the processes leads to application forms not properly completed and insufficient supporting documentation being submitted to GPAA for pension pay-out.

  12. FINDINGS Feedback communication from GPAA to stakeholders • Feedback on progress and challenges is received by the retirees and/or beneficiaries of deceased employees only when they call or walk into GPAA offices. • The problems range from incomplete forms or incorrectly completed forms, unclear bank stamps, and/or inconsistencies related to the details of the applicant against the banking details indicated in the forms. E-Channel equipment requirements • The e-Channel system that departments are supposed to use when submitting pension forms require more bandwidth, high volume scanners and computers with high capability, which some departments do not have.

  13. FINDINGS Structure of departments • The centralised HR processes for big departments create a problem for the completion of the pension pay-out process. • The greatest challenge is with those regional offices in the deep rural areas where there is poor or no internet connection and post office services take place once or twice a month. • In trying to address this problem, GPAA has introduced mobile offices which cater for the needs of rural areas. All Provinces use the mobile office service - in small-medium provinces there is 1 mobile office and the bigger provinces have 2. Information about the routes of this mobile offices is sent to Premiers offices and also advertised through local media.

  14. FINDINGS Other challenges that were indicated were: • Divorce cases - in some cases the retirees will contest the lesser amount they receive, forgetting the conditions of the divorce decree that allows for a 50% sharing – thus creating a debt for the retiree. • Integration of the TBVC pension funds and GEPF- problems due to missing employment records or incorrect pensionable years information presented to GPAA. • Medical aid - According to the provisions of GEPF member’s guide, when an employee has completed fifteen years of service and/or above, he/she is entitled to the post retirement subsidy of medical aid. If there are delays in the submission of the pension pay-out claim, this will have a negative effect on the processing of the post-retirement medical aid benefits.

  15. FINDINGS Challenges in managing service termination and pension pay-out Departments: • Reluctance or refusal by employees to submit or re-submit the required documents; • Difficulty in obtaining beneficiaries or family members of the deceased employees’ information, in a case where children are minors and no adult is nominated to act as a guardian/surety for the children. • The unavailability of good working scanners for HR officials to scan documents into a single file with attachments and submit to GPAA, to avoid rejection of the applications due to non availability of supporting documents. • Unavailability of GPAA Client Liaison Officers (CLO) sometimes when needed, due to their commitments since they service several departments.

  16. FINDINGS GPAA: • Some employer departments do not use the e-Channel system but rely on the Client Liaison Officers (CLOs) to submit forms for GPAA. • GPAA is depending upon the employer departments to provide accurate information about the pension member and his dependants/beneficiaries. NB: All these challenges have a negative impact on the 60 days turnaround time and it creates inconsistencies regarding payment processes.

  17. FINDINGS Impact of pension pay-out delays on the welfare of retirees and their dependents • Some retirees’ medical aids were cancelled due to non payment of monthly subscriptions. • Some retirees or beneficiaries of deceased employees could not feed their families, pay for children’s school, and/or lost their possessions. • Other retirees became victims of loan sharks and found themselves in deep financial crisis which was worse than when they were working. • Some decedents and dependents of retirees, in trying to help the situation, ended up in criminal activities. NB: It should be noted that some employees who went on retirement between 1996 and 2013 experienced more problems as compared to employees who went on retirement from 2013 until 2015. The problems during the 1996 to 2013 period could be attributed to various factors, ranging from questionable pension years, GPAA’s unclear and problematic systems, up to dependants/beneficiaries not claiming their benefits, etc…

  18. FINDINGS The role of stakeholders involved with the pension pay-out • Government Pension Administration Agency (GPAA) Manage and administer pensions and other benefits for government employees in South Africa. • Banks The Banks are responsible for the verification process of declaring whether the bank account belongs to the principal member or the beneficiary as per the records sent to GPAA. • SARS SARS is responsible for collection of Tax Revenue in South Africa. If an employee failed to submit tax returns during his/her employment time that could have an impact on the processing and finalisation of his/her pension pay-out.

  19. RECOMMENDATIONS • Structured, planned and compulsory training on all HR processes, especially for service termination and pension pay-out processes must be provided by departments or the NSG and DPSA. • The GPAA in collaboration with departments should create a database of unclaimed pension benefits by dependants or beneficiaries and employ a tracing agent to find the dependants or beneficiaries and process their claims. • Departments should submit details of pension members or beneficiaries who have not claimed their pension to GPAA to add to the work of the tracing agent. • Big national departments such as Labour, and Water and Sanitation that have provincial and regional offices across the country should decentralise some HR functions, especially processes related to service termination and pension pay-outs.

  20. RECOMMENDATIONS • Departments, in collaboration with GPAA and SARS should implement awareness campaigns continuously for the benefit of newly appointed employees and long-term serving employees to ensure a thorough understanding of the processes, income tax issues and legislative changes. Where possible, dependants and/or beneficiaries should be invited to the information sessions with the consent of pension members. • Departments should also set aside financial resources to upgrade their IT systems to enable them to be compatible with the GPAA e-Channel system. • Departments and GPAA must put in place a strategy to communicate with and provide feedback and support to retirees, dependants and beneficiaries of deceased employees until finalisation of the pension pay-out process.

  21. CONCLUSION • Challenges around delays with pension pay-out are not caused by the absence of policies and procedures, but the human factor. • HR practitioners are aware of role they play in managing beneficiary profiles, but there is an acknowledgment of limited powers as they cannot force individual employees to nominate beneficiaries and they cannot even verify if the information provided is accurate. • Retirees and dependants/beneficiaries of deceased members must be supported in completing and submitting pension withdrawal applications to GPAA.

  22. Thank you Siyabonga PSC Website: www.psc.gov.za National Anti-Corruption Hotline for the Public Service: 0800 701 701

More Related