1 / 24

OPTIMALVAC Initiative on Optimising Malaria Vaccine Laboratory Assays Evaluation

OPTIMALVAC Initiative on Optimising Malaria Vaccine Laboratory Assays Evaluation. About the project. EC FP7 Coordination and Support Action EC Budget €1 mil. Complementary contributions from the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( € 0.5 mil ).

coye
Download Presentation

OPTIMALVAC Initiative on Optimising Malaria Vaccine Laboratory Assays Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. OPTIMALVAC Initiative on Optimising Malaria Vaccine Laboratory Assays Evaluation

  2. About the project • EC FP7 Coordination and Support Action • EC Budget €1 mil. • Complementary contributions from the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (€0.5 mil ). • 13 Partners; Coordinator : EVI; Global Coordinator: WHO • Start Date: 01 April 2009, three years

  3. Objectives The goal is to identify and harmonise key immunoassays to facilitate comparison of results and improve decision-making in malaria vaccine development.

  4. Immunoassays in Malaria Vaccine Development Assess immunogenic potential of candidate vaccines

  5. Keyword: Correlates of protection • Correlates of immunity/protection to a virus or other infectious pathogen are measurable signs that a person (or other potential host) is immune, in the sense of being protected against becoming infected and/or developing disease. • Without knowing the correlates of immunity, scientists cannot know exactly what sort of immune response a vaccine would need to stimulate

  6. Y Vaccine Candidate A Naturally aquired Immunity or immune potection demonstrated in clinical trials or challenge studies Vaccine Candiate B Down selection of vaccine candidates

  7. Malaria vaccines: correlates of protection not fully characterised • 2/3 of malaria vaccines use IgG assays, 1/3 T cell based assays as readout • Immunoassays used to determine intake of vaccines • Robust assays requried to compare different approaches

  8. Malaria Vaccine Assay Harmonisation Harmonisation of SOPs/Reagents 1st Comparison with Existing SOPs/ Reagents Identify Key Assays and Labs 1st Comparison with Existing SOPs/ Reagents Agreed Community Harmonised SOPs & Reagent Repository Iterative Comparisons with Harmonised SOPs Agreed Community Harmonised SOPs & Reagent Repository Assay Validation Establishment of Reference Centre Assay Validation

  9. Key immunoassays identified for harmonisation in OPTIMALVAC Cell mediated immunity • ICS • ELISPOT Humoral Assays • Blood Stage IFA Functional Assays • Antibody-dependent cellular inhibition assay

  10. T cell mediated immunity Work package leader: Dr Patrice Dubois, Immunovacc Consulting Enyzme linked Immunospot (ELISpot) Intracellular Cytokine staining (ICS) Labelled CD4 AB Y T cell Y Labelled anti-cytokine AB • Assess number of cytokine producing T cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells after stimulation • Cell-mediated immunity (CMI) does not involve antibodies but rather the activation of macrophages and NK-cells, the production of antigen-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes , and the release of various cytokines in response to an antigen .

  11. ICS – Intracellular cytokine staining • Whole blood is cultured and stimulated • Brefeldin A added shortly before measurement to trap cytokines in the cell • T cell subtypes are marked with fluorescent labelled antibodies • Cells are fixed and permeabilised • Staining with fluorescent-labelled AB against cytokine • Analysis by Fluorescence activated Cell Sorting (FACS) Labelled CD4 AB Y T cell Y Labelled anti-cytokine AB

  12. ELISpot - Enzyme Linked Immuno-Spot • PBMCs cultured and stimulated in 96well plates with antibody coated membrane • Secreted IFN binds to antibody on membrane • Detection with secondary antibody coupled to enzyme • Add substrate and develop • Analysis in ELISpot plate reader

  13. T cell mediated immunity •  Barcelona Centre for International Health Research (CRESIB), Spain • Biomedical Primate Research Centre, BPRC, The Netherlands (Only ICS) • Infectious Disease Research Institute (IDRI), USA (Only ELISpot) • Institut Pasteur, France • Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kenya • National Institutes of Health (NIH), USA • Radboud University Medical Center, The Netherlands (Only ICS) • Seattle Biomedical Research Institute, USA (Only ELISpot) • University of Oxford, UK • Walter Reed Army Institute for Research (WRAIR), USA Five african laboratories will be added at a later stage Identify Key Assays and Labs

  14. T cell mediated immunity • Harmonised ICS and ELISpot SOP from the HIV community will be adapted • Stimulation (activation of T cells in ELISpot and ICS): • Tetanus Toxoid (Donation from Serum Institute India Ltd.) • CEF peptides (a pool of MHC class 1 binding peptides derived from the CMV, EBV and Flu viruses (JPT Peptide Technologies GmbH). • Positive control: • Human PBMCs selected for reactivity to TT and CEF peptides (Dr GepiPantaleo, CHUV in Lausanne) • Three separate rounds of testing planned starting from Q1 2011 Harmonisation of SOPs/Reagents Harmonisation of SOPs/Reagents 1st Comparison with Existing SOPs/ Reagents 1st Comparison with Existing SOPs/ Reagents Identify Key Assays and Labs Iterative Comparisons with Harmonised SOPs

  15. Blood stage Immunofluorescence Assay (IFA) Work package leader: Dr David Cavanagh, University of Edinburgh • Assess capacity of purified murine and human antibodies to recognise malaria parasites in infected red blood cells. • As quantification of the IFA, anti-parasite IgG endpoint titers are determined Y Labelled Secondary AB Y Primary AB Parasite Infected RBC

  16. Blood stage Immunofluorescence Assay (IFA) • Participating laboratories • Biomedical Primate Research Centre, BPRC, Netherlands • Radboud University Nijmegen, RUNMC, Netherlands • University of Edinburgh, UK Identify Key Assays and Labs

  17. Blood stage Immunofluorescence Assay (IFA) • Identification of standard reagents: • Positive controls • 4G2 (rat anti-AMA1 mAb) – BPRC, • polyclonal anti-AMA-1 rabbit IgG (lyophilized) - BPRC • mAb 12.8 (mouse anti-MSP1-19) – UEDIN • pooled anti-MSP-1-19 rabbit sera • Negative control: naïve rabbit IgG - UEDIN • Single, synchronised batch of mature P.falciparum schizont rich IFA slides (Wellcome isolate) • Test reagents diluted, coded and shipped by National Institute for Biological standards and Control (NIBSC) • First round of testing currently finalised and data analysed by NIBSC Harmonisation of SOPs/Reagents 1st Comparison with Existing SOPs/ Reagents Identify Key Assays and Labs

  18. Antibody Dependent Cell Inhibition (ADCI) Assay Work package leader: Dr Patrice Dubois, Immunovacc Consulting • ADCI is based on the capacity of purified human or murine antibodies to inhibit malaria parasite growth in cooperation with effector cells (monocytes) • Mechanism shown to correlate with protection after passive transfer of antibodies1 • Low IgG concentrations required for activity • 1 Bouharoun-Tayoun et al., JEM, 1990

  19. ADCI (Antibody Dependent Cell Inhibition) Assay - Protocol Y • Serum IgG preparation using ion exchange chromatography • Monocyte isolation from a healthy blood donor • Preparation of P. falciparum parasites including synchronisation and schizont enrichment • Parasite culture, for 96h, in the presence of antibodies and monocytes • Inhibition effect assessed by microscopic observation and parasite counting Y

  20. Antibody Dependent Cell Inhibition (ADCI) Assay • Biomedical Primate Research Centre, BPRC, Netherlands • Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, CDC, USA • Institut Pasteur, IP, France • International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, ICGEB, India • Radboud University Nijmegen, RUNMC, Netherlands • University of Edinburgh, UK Identify Key Assays and Labs

  21. Antibody Dependent Cell Inhibition (ADCI) Assay Identification of standard reagents: • Positive standard: • Pools of human sera collected in malaria endemic regions with shown ADCI reactivity – ethical clearance from NIBSC ethical review board • Monoclonal RAM-1 Ab (Human IgG1 specific for P.falciparum MSP-3) with shown ADCI activity – quality control under way Existing protocols will be compared using standardised positive controls and from this a consensus SOP determined. Harmonisation of SOPs/Reagents 1st Comparison with Existing SOPs/ Reagents Identify Key Assays and Labs

  22. Reference Reagent Repository Harmonisation of SOPs/Reagents 1st Comparison with Existing SOPs/ Reagents Identify Key Assays and Labs Agreed Community Harmonised SOPs & Reagent Repository Iterative Comparisons with Harmonised SOPs www.malariaresearch.eu

  23. Outlook • Harmonised SOP and control reagents available in reference reagent repository by the end of the project • Sharing of harmonisation activities in- and outside of the malaria vaccine community → Contacts established: Sylvia Janetzki, Cancer Vaccine Consortium (T cell harmonisation/Cancer) Tom H.M. Ottenhoff, Leiden University Medical Center (T cell harmonisation/TB) Thomas N.Denny, Barton F.Haynes, Duke University Human Vaccine Institute (T cell harmonisation/HIV)

  24. Questions? Project website: www.optimalvac.eu Coordinator Dr Odile Leroy Project Manager Dr Agnes Kisser European Vaccine Initiative UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 326 - 3. OG 69120 Heidelberg Germany www.euvaccine.eu Global Coordinator Dr Vasee Moorthy WHO Initiative for Vaccine Research Geneva

More Related