1 / 23

Corporate eLearning Acceptance: the role of Context and Communication

This study explores the role of context and communication in the acceptance of eLearning in corporate environments. It provides a theoretical framework, presents a map of eLearning acceptance, and offers a practical index for learning managers and researchers.

criderl
Download Presentation

Corporate eLearning Acceptance: the role of Context and Communication

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Corporate eLearning Acceptance: the role of Context and Communication Chiara Succi & Lorenzo Cantoni University of Lugano ICELW 2008

  2. Agenda • Research Problem & Design • Literature Review • Map of eLearning Acceptance (MeLA) • Field studies • Conclusions Design Review MeLA Field Conclusions

  3. Introduction • Fast integration of ICT and their impact onto society • Computer literacy & employability • Knowledge as a key factor • “Just in time” workforce (Rifkin, 2001) • Importance of eLearning in the knowledge society Design

  4. Research Problem • Dropout is the “Achilles heel” of eLearning (Martinez, 2003) or its embarrassing secret and “taboo” (Frankola, 2001) • Dropouts rates are at least 10 to 20% higher than in their face-to-face counterparts • Lack of sound, rigorous models specifically focused on learners’ acceptance and satisfaction with eLearning Design

  5. Research questions • Q1: How is the eLearning acceptance process structured? • Q2: Which is the role of the context in eLearning acceptance? • Q3: Which is the role of communication in eLearning acceptance? Design

  6. Methodology • Q1 has been answered through the analysis of the literature • a conceptual map • Q2 has been answered through literature review and case studies • Q3 has been answered through case studies and two surveys • list of variables and a taxonomy • final acceptance index Design

  7. Alenia (IT), Esprinet (IT), Banca Intesa (IT) Kraft (UK), Alcoa (Australia) Fiat Auto (IT), Ernst & Young (IT), JetBlue (USA), Homedepot (USA) Design

  8. Theoretical Framework • From the literature • Innovation acceptance • Diffusion theories (Rogers, 2003) • Technology acceptance • TAM (Davis, 1989) • Learning Acceptance • Higher and Distance Education studies (Rovai, 2003) Review

  9. Important elements • It is possible to identify: • Components (knowledge, commitment) • they interact with each other • Stages (preparation, action, persistence) • it is a process • Variables (eLearner, asset, organizational context) • where should an organization intervene? MeLA

  10. MeLA: Map of eLearning Acceptance MeLA

  11. 40 variables MeLA

  12. ... and 4 critical areas MeLA

  13. ... and 4 critical areas • MEANING • To make sure learners have “good reasons” to attend an activity and that they can see an added value for their job career. • INFORMATION • Learners have to expect the right thing. New skills, innovative learning strategies and a different time management are implied by eLearning. • INVOLVEMENT • The support of the top-management is extremely important to create an eLearning culture; the use formal and informal channels to integrate eLearning in corporate practices and values. • FRAMEWORK • Allocation of time windows and spaces for eLearning activities; encouraging policies and incentive systems can enhance eLearning acceptance. MeLA

  14. Field

  15. 6 steps toward the final index • SELECTION • important factors have been selected from the literature on the base of researcher reflections’ and on their observations during explorative case studies • REFINING • through an ex-post rationalization, variables have been compared with important factors emerged in the case studies in order to verify the completeness of the list • OPERATIONALIZATION • all the variables have been described based on the interviews conducted with learning officers in the case studies (es. com. behaviour – com. plan) • CLUSTERING • critical areas have been identified and verified discussing with eLearning managers • ASSESSMENT • a survey has been built in order to assess the presence of the variables and to verify if the list assembled by case studies was complete • RANKING • a second survey has been delivered to a different sample to assign a value to each variable Field

  16. Case studies Field

  17. 1° survey • Built and delivered in collaboration with the Masie Center (NY) and the Learning Consortium (www.masie.com) • Sample of 144 Fortune 500 companies (10-15 milions of employees) • Only learning managers and CLOs involved • Pilot with 5 learning managers • Response ratio 42% Field

  18. 2° survey • Sample • 55 contacts of the Learning Consortium who left their data for the follow-up • 12 learning managers met during case studies • 139 learning managers • the questionnaire has also been promoted by an online magazine and some blogs • 54 valid questionnaires back Field

  19. eLearning Acceptance Index Field

  20. Results • Creation of a Map (MeLA) that integrate different models • Definition of the eLearning Acceptance Index as a tool for learning managers and researchers • Set of variables considered important by the 100% of responders • Ranking of parameters to set priorities in the implementation process Conclusions

  21. Conclusions • Companies are more focused on the short-term (details vs. organizational culture) • Small and young companies invest more on the context to enhance the commitment of eLearners • Communication channels are in use even if not fully exploited Conclusions

  22. Future developments • Refine the methodology • Extension of the sample • Geographical (Asia and Europe) • Numerical • Stronger interpretative framework • Causal relationships among variables • Define consistent implementation procedures and a set of management guidelines • Inclusion of external variables (costs, time, complexity) Conclusions

  23. Dedicated support Warm invitation Passionate commitment

More Related