1 / 15

EU Fundamental Rights and Private Law in the Context of Different Legal Families

1. EU Fundamental Rights and Private Law in the Context of Different Legal Families. Prof. Dr. Dr. Aurelia Colombi Ciacchi University of Groningen (NL). OVERVIEW OF THIS PRESENTATION. 2. I. EU fundamental rights: history, definition. II. Fund. rights: vertical + horizontal effect.

cropper
Download Presentation

EU Fundamental Rights and Private Law in the Context of Different Legal Families

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 1 EU FundamentalRightsand Private Lawin the Context of Different Legal Families Prof. Dr. Dr. Aurelia Colombi Ciacchi University of Groningen (NL)

  2. OVERVIEW OF THIS PRESENTATION 2 I. EU fundamental rights: history, definition II. Fund. rights: vertical + horizontal effect III. Own research results (in short) IV. Legal families in comparative law V. New legal families of horizontal effect of fundamental rights VI. First family: Reaction to totalitarianism VII. Second family: UK + Nordic countries VIII. Third family: France + Benelux

  3. 3 • EU FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (1): A BRIEF HISTORY • 1960s-1970s: ECJ human rights in international treaties binding on the EU member states + fundamental rights enshrined in the common constitutional traditions of the member states = to be observed as general principles of Community law •  established ECJ case law in 1970s-1990s •  codified in Maastricht Treaty (1992-1993) •  repeated in all successive Treaties

  4. 4 I. EU FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (2): A BRIEF DEFINITION • Human rights acknowledged in international conventions binding the EU member states, AND • Rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFREU), AND • Rights enshrined in the common constitutional traditions of the EU member states.

  5. 5 II. EFFECTOF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS: (1) VERTICAL • Effect on relationship between public authority and person subject to authority • Effect on enactment, abolition, formal amendment of legislation Examples: • Legislative reforms realized for the purpose of complying with fundamental rights • Const. Courts declaring laws unconstitutional • Condemnation of States by human rights courts

  6. 6 II. EFFECTOF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS: (2) HORIZONTAL • Fundamental rights used (mostly by courts) to determine the entitlements and obligations of private parties against each other Direct horizontal effect: • Remedy (e.g. damages, injunction) directly descends from fundamental rights • Private party directly bound by fundam. right Indirect horizontal effect: • Fund. right  interpretation of private law • Private party not directly bound by fund. right

  7. 7 III. OWN RESEARCH RESULTS • Brüggemeier, Colombi Ciacchi & Comandé (eds), Fundamental Rights and Private Law in the European Union (CUP 2010, two volumes) • Several articles and book chapters of mine 2005-2017  Different models of horizontal effect of fundamental rights exist in Europe  Different groups of countries, which do NOT match with the traditional legal families described by comparative lawyers

  8. 8 IV. LEGAL FAMILIES IN COMPARATIVE LAW • Civil law, common law, mixed jurisdictions • Civil law families: Romanistic, Germanic, Nordic (Zweigert & Kötz) • Z&K’s division descends from a legislation-oriented, law-in-the-books perspective, mainly looking at Civil Codes • Case-law oriented, law-in-action perspective (e.g. “The Common Core of European Private Law”)  new, topic-specific groups of countries that do not match with legal families

  9. 9 V. NEW LEGAL FAMILIES OF HORIZONTAL EFFECT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS • Horizontal effect of fundamental rights: law-in-action topic, based on case law and scholarly writings • Three new legal families of horizontal effect of fundamental rights can be traced back to two factors: - Comparative constitutional law and history - Historical-cultural relation between legislators and courts in the field of private law

  10. 10 VI. FIRST FAMILY: REACTION TO TOTALITARIANISM (1) • Continental European democracies instituted in the 20th century after the fall of totalitarian regimes • Examples: Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain • Constitutional norms entrenched • Great power allocated to courts (judicial activism) - Key role of Constitutional Courts, whose judgments  evolution of private law

  11. 11 VI. FIRST FAMILY: REACTION TO TOTALITARIANISM (2) • Horizontal effect of national constitutional provisions • Horizontal effect of ECHR hardly plays any role • Constitutional Courts do not only strike down unconstitutional laws but also determine the correct interpretation and application of Constitution in private law cases  Major changes in private law adjudication are often initiated or consecrated by constitutional courts

  12. 12 VII. SECOND FAMILY: UK AND NORDIC COUNTRIES • Old democracies not replaced by totalitarian regimes in the 20th century • No continental-like Constitution • No Constitutional Court • International/national law: dualist model • ECHR incorporation only after 1990 • Horizontal effect ECHR • E.g. Sweden: no horizontal effect of the four constitutional statutes

  13. 13 VIII. THIRD FAMILY: FRANCE AND BENELUX (1) • France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxemburg • Old democracies not replaced by totalitarian regimes in the 20th century • Written entrenched Constitutions (French style) • NL: no institution comparable to a constitutional court + no constitutional review by judiciary • International/national law: monist model

  14. 14 VIII. THIRD FAMILY: FRANCE AND BENELUX (2) • Horizontal effect ECHR • Horizontal effect of national constitutions hardly plays any role! Why? - International law instruments such as ECHR have supremacy over national law + are directly effective insofar as self-executing • Legal culture considers constitutional norms a purely public law matter: 19th century strict separation between public law and private law

  15. 15 … AND WHAT ABOUT MALTA?

More Related