1 / 10

Practical Experiences - Evaluation of Program 1

This evaluation assesses the performance of Program 1, identifies outcomes and challenges, and proposes improvements for stronger program delivery. It focuses on patent law, patents, and the technology sector. The evaluation includes evidence-based analysis, interviews, and a survey among key stakeholders.

ctrammel
Download Presentation

Practical Experiences - Evaluation of Program 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Practical Experiences - Evaluation of Program 1 Geneva January 29, 2016

  2. Evaluation Objectives • Assess Program performance, identify main outcomes and challenges and analyze their impacts. • Propose improvements to further strengthen program delivery in collaboration with other Programs.

  3. Program 1 Evaluation • IOD’s First Program Evaluation: • High strategic relevance for Organization and Member States in the context of normative work and legislative advice. • Good potential to learn lessons and replicate innovative approaches.

  4. Program 1 – Patent Law,Patents and Technology Sector • Mission:Progressive development of balanced international patent law and practice that serves Member States, users and society as an instrument to encourage innovation and technology transfer, in particular, in developing countries and countries with economies in transition. • Main areas of work: • Supporting discussions and activities of the Standing Committee on the Law of Patents (SCP). • Legislative and policy advice given to Member States. • Administration of Budapest Treaty, Paris Convention and Patent Law Treaty (PLT).

  5. Patent Law Division ACTING DIRECTOR (M. Aleman) SECRETARY (L. Thondoo) LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY ADVICE SECTION SENIOR LEGAL COUNSELLOR (V. Jouvin) PATENT LAW SECTION HEAD (T. Miyamoto) BUDAPEST TREATY SECTION HEAD (E. Glantschnig) LEGAL OFFICER (A. Dolotbaeva) ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (B. Claudel) LEGAL OFFICER (M. Hanssen Perez) INTERN (M. Diaz Pozo) ASSOCIATE LEGAL OFFICER (G. Ragonesi) SECRETARY (N. Prevost)

  6. Program 1 – Evaluation Tools • Evidence-based qualitative and quantitative analysis: • Desk studies; • Survey among key stakeholders and individual interviews: • 69 interviewees – 39 WIPO Managers and 30 external interviewees; • 56 survey responses (survey covered 22% of Member States, 6% of IGOs, 2% of NGOs and 31% of IDAs); • evaluation gathered responses representing 36% of Member States.

  7. Program 1 Evaluation - Recommendations • Four Recommendations made. • Status as of January 2016: • Closed – 1 • Under Finalization – 1 • Work in Progress – 2 • Working with IOD on implementation: • Detailed action plan (activities and estimated target dates); • Meetings on progress review and updates.

  8. Program 1 Evaluation - Recommendation 1

  9. Program 1 Evaluation - Implementation

  10. Program 1 Evaluation and its Benefits • Facilitated review & improvement of the program results framework, particularly in defining relevant Performance Indicators & systematic data collection mechanism. • Emphasized needs for efficient allocation of resources to key activities based on a demand-driven approach. • Reinforced intra & inter sector coordination. • Encouraged knowledge sharing with other UN organizations dealing with normative work.

More Related