1 / 12

Work-Home Interference Does work load cause work-home interference or is it the other way around?

This study explores the reciprocal relationship between perceived workload and work-home interference over a one-year period. Findings suggest a dynamic process, with no substantial effects of job and family changes on workload and interference. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

dalilaw
Download Presentation

Work-Home Interference Does work load cause work-home interference or is it the other way around?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Work-Home InterferenceDoes work load cause work-home interference or is it the other way around? Josje Dikkers Amsterdam Center for Career Research Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam The Netherlands

  2. Work-Home Interference • The composition of the workforce has changed; more women have joined the workforce, and the number of dual earner families is rising. • Some 40% of the Dutch workforce experiences conflicts between work and home (Geurts, Kompier, Roxburgh, & Houtman, 2003); in the USA 30% of employees and 40% of working parents report work-home conflicts (Bond, Galinsky, & Swanberg, 1998)

  3. Process whereby one’s functioning (and behavior) in the home domain is influenced negatively by demands from the work domain (Geurts & Demerouti, 2003)

  4. Antecedents • Several reviews (e.g., Byron, 2005; Eby et al., 2005) distinguish between three main categories of antecedents: • work domain variables (e.g., schedule flexibility), • non-work or family domain variables (e.g., marital conflict), and • demographic and individual variables (e.g., income)

  5. Among work domain variables, research has consistently shown that work (over)load is related strongly to work-home interference • Employees experiencing high levels of work (over)load report high levels of work-home interference (WHI) • However, most previous studies are cross-sectional; causal relationships could not be demonstrated

  6. Study • Research question: what is the causal relationship between perceived quantitative workload and WHI? • Hypothesis 1: high levels of T1 workload are associated with increased levels of T2 WHI • Hypothesis 2: high levels of T1 WHI are associated with increased levels of T2 workload

  7. Time 1 Time 2 Workload Workload H. 1 Work-home interference Work-home interference H. 2

  8. Method • Sample: N = 828 Dutch police officers (85% male, M age = 42 years; 83% performing standard police work) • Two-wave, full-panel design with a 1-year time interval • Instruments: • Workload – NOVA-WEBA (Dhondt & Houtman, 1992; 1997) • WHI – SWING (Geurts et al., 2005) • Covariates – Gender and age • Reported job and family changes in-between the waves

  9. Reported changes in-between waves: • No job/family change(s) (N = 519) • Job change(s) (N = 126); mainly for better career opportunities (39%) and more challenging tasks (34%) • Family change(s) (N = 140) • Job & family change(s) (N = 31); mainly child(ren) leaving the house (26%), and childbirth (24%)

  10. Results Time 1 Time 2 β = .57 Workload Workload β = .12 Work-home interference Work-home interference β = .16 β = .60

  11. Conclusions • Workload and WHI influence each other reciprocally over a 1-year period; dynamic process • Job and family changes did not have a substantial effect on workload and WHI, nor on their relationships • Theoretical implication: integrative WHI models • Practical implication: interventions at the workplace (family-friendly policies & culture) & individual level (active coping and planning)

  12. Questions?

More Related