1 / 34

Constructing Deviance Adler and Adler

Constructing Deviance Adler and Adler. Part IV. I. Moral Entrepreneurs: Campaigning. Awareness Moral Conversion Moral Panic. Part 4. A. Moral Entrepreneurs. Those who construct moral meanings & associate them with particular acts or conditions by drawing on power & resources of:

Download Presentation

Constructing Deviance Adler and Adler

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Constructing Deviance Adler and Adler Part IV

  2. I. Moral Entrepreneurs: Campaigning Awareness Moral Conversion Moral Panic Part 4

  3. A. Moral Entrepreneurs • Those who construct moral meanings & associate them with particular acts or conditions by drawing on power & resources of: • Institutions • Agencies • Symbols or ideas • Communication to audiences Part 4

  4. B. Two Facets of Deviance-Making Process • Rule-creating: politicians, public crusaders, teachers, parents, school administrators, business leaders • Rule-enforcing: police, prosecutors, judges, and other informal agents of control such as dormitory RAs Part 4

  5. C. Rule-Creating • By individuals • First Lady Nancy Reagan “Just Say No”; • John Walsh for founding Missing and Exploited Children’s Network and the TV show America’s Most Wanted; • Michael Moore for documentaries about big business and violence • By Groups – • Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) • Group Against Smoking Pollution (GASP) Part 4

  6. C. Rule-Creating • Moral entrepreneurs manufacture public morality through a multi-stage process, beginning first with the generation of awareness of a problem • Claims-making: danger-messages are generated about specific issues such as drunken-driving, hate crimes, second-hand smoke, outsourcing, school violence • In this stage will draw upon experts and employ several rhetorical methods including statistics and particular case examples Part 4

  7. D. Second Stage Involves Moral Conversion or Convincing Others • Claimsmakers must draw on elements of drama, novelty, politics and cultural myths to gain visibility for their issue • They seek to attract media attention through hunger strikes, demonstrations, civil disobedience, marches, and picketing • They seek support of sponsors and opinion leaders – celebrities for public endorsements Part 4

  8. E. If Successful, Campaigns May Foster a Moral Panic • Temporary but widespread concern about an issue, promoted by much media attention and sometimes legislative attention, takes center stage • Triggered by specific event at right moment, draw attention to a specific group as a target, have provocative content revealed, and supported by formal and informal communication outlets Part 4

  9. II. Differential Social Power: Labeling Money Race and ethnicity Gender Age Part 4

  10. A. Some Groups Have More Social Power to Construct Definitions of Deviance & Impose Labels on Others • Money: can be used for campaign contributions to sway politicians to favor and disfavor new laws, to fund favorable research, and to fight restrictive lawsuits • Race and ethnicity: dominant white group behaviors less likely to be defined and enforced as deviant • Gender: women have less social power than males are more subject to labeling • Age: Younger and older people hold less respect in our society Part 4

  11. III. Differential Social Power: Resisting Labeling Part 4

  12. Differential Social Power • Same powerful groups have greater resources to avoid being labeled • They may hire media and legal experts to foster positive collective images: • gun owners are “upstanding” citizens, drug or alcohol companies promote favorable images Part 4

  13. Review Questions • How do powerful groups avoid being labeled? • How are rules created and implemented? Part 4

  14. The Social Construction of Drug ScaresReinarman Part IV Chapter 15

  15. I. Drug Scares and Drug Laws Part 4: Ch. 15

  16. Drug Scares and Drug Laws • The cultural origins and nature of anti-drug appeals must be understood • Drug wars & anti-drug crusades involving marked public concern about a specific drug or drugs are not simply reflections of problems people are experiencing: • Such drug scares are a recurring social phenomena in their own right Part 4: Ch. 15

  17. A. Major Drug Scares, Anti-Drug Crusades • Alcohol: Temperance Movement to Prohibition; primarily led by middle-class, Protestant, white (WASP) Americans reacting to drinking behaviors of Catholic immigrants from Europe Part 4: Ch. 15

  18. A. Major Drug Scares, Anti-Drug Crusades • Anti-opium den laws of San Francisco in 1875 directed against Chinese immigrants • Anti-marijuana laws of Great Depression directed at Mexican Americans and later connected to drop-out, hippie counterculture that was corrupting morality of the youth • More recently in 1980s the crack cocaine scare, directed against urban, poor African- Americans Part 4: Ch. 15

  19. B. Seven Elements to Drug Scares • A kernel of truth • Media magnification • Politico-moral entrepreneurs • Professional interest groups • Historical context of conflict • Link a form of drug-use to a “dangerous class” • Scapegoating a drug for a variety of social problems Part 4: Ch. 15

  20. II. Toward a Culturally Specific Theory of Drug Scares Part 4: Ch. 15

  21. A. Drug Scares Seem to Occur More Frequently in American Society: Why? • First, claims about evil of drugs provide a welcome vocabulary of attribution and something to blame for social problems • Second, American society, predicated on Protestantism and capitalism emphasize self-control; • As a result loss of such control is to be avoided at all cost! • Third, we live today in a new consumer culture that exacerbates the issue of self-control; • It is this on-going dynamic between self-control and self-indulgence that empowers our drug scares Part 4: Ch. 15

  22. Review Questions • Of the drugs that are classified as illegal, which ones are thought to be the most serious or dangerous? • What are drug scares and in what ways are they correlated with minority groups? Part 4: Ch. 15

  23. Blowing Smoke: Status Politics & the Smoking BanTuggle & Holmes Part IV Chapter 16

  24. Status Politics & the Creation of Deviance • Deviance is socially constructed • The ability to define and construct reality is closely connected to the power structure of society • Status conflicts, and resultant status degradation ceremonies of behavior characteristic of a lower status, enhance the status of those who condemn and abstain from such behavior • Deviance creates political competition in which moral entrepreneurs originate moral crusades aimed at generating reform • Such moral crusades are dominated by members of upper social strata of society Part 4: Ch. 16

  25. Status Politics & the Creation of Deviance • Moral crusades may be either assimilative or coercive reforms • Assimilative: sympathy for deviant engenders integrative efforts aimed at lifting the repentant to higher moral plane of the upper status group (education) • Coercive: deviants viewed as denying moral and status superiority of reformers (law and force) • Moral entrepreneur cannot succeed alone: must enlist broader public support Part 4: Ch. 16

  26. The Status Politics of Cigarette Smoking • Political dynamics involved in construction of deviance may be seen in the efforts to end smoking in public facilities • Cigarette smoking universally accepted in 1940s, 1950s and 1960s until surgeon general’s report on health risks of smoking in 1964 • More people today see smoking as socially deviant, unclean and intrusive to others Part 4: Ch. 16

  27. The Status Politics of Cigarette Smoking • Abstinence and bodily purity are key to nonsmoker’s claim of moral superiority • Antismoking movement has targeted a lifestyle typical of the working classes; • Moral entrepreneurs crusading against smoking are of higher social status, the “knowledge” class of educators, therapeutic and counseling professions • Early remedial efforts focused on publicizing the perils of smoking, reflecting a strategy of assimilative reform through education: • Resulted in decline in smoking Part 4: Ch. 16

  28. The Status Politics of Cigarette Smoking • Remaining smokers have become redefined as enemy • Focus of social control efforts to ban smoking in public places as evidence mounted on adverse effects of smoking on nonusers • Success of antismoking crusade rooted in moral crusaders ability to mobilize power, aided by government campaigns, and widely publicized health risks of smoking • Success of this moral crusade also related to deviance being connected with lower social status groups, whose stigmatization reinforce existing power structure Part 4: Ch. 16

  29. Research Study • Study hypothesis: supporters of smoking ban would be of higher social status than those opposing it • Site of research: Shasta County, California • Referendum to ban smoking in public places passed by 56% majority; special election by those opposing it lost again by 58% majority; • Ordinance went into effect July,1993 Part 4: Ch. 16

  30. Analytic Strategy • Interviews with five leading moral entrepreneurs and five status quo defenders • Primary concern of moral entrepreneurs was health but three also made negative comments about smoking, thereby degrading the status of smokers Part 4: Ch. 16

  31. A. Findings • “Smoking is no longer an acceptable action” • “Smoke stinks” • “It is just a dirty and annoying habit” Part 4: Ch. 16

  32. A. Findings • Status quo defenders also had two arguments: a person’s right (freedom) and business profits • Smoking viewed as a constitutionally protected right of free individuals • Worries about loss of smoking customers with a ban Part 4: Ch. 16

  33. Summary and Discussion • Debate between proponents of ban to prohibit smoking in public places versus those defenders of individuals’ right to decide where to smoke reflect a difference in social power • Winners in moral and stigma contests generally represent higher social classes, involve symbolic dimension, and this was reflected in current study Part 4: Ch. 16

  34. Review Questions • Is the association of tobacco with lower-status persons a factor in the crusade against smoking in public facilities? • Compare anti-smoking campaigns to those of the tobacco company and its glorification in the movies. How “mixed” are the messages? Part 4: Ch. 16

More Related