1 / 21

National Consumer Agency Market Research Findings: Consumer Empowerment and Customer Service

National Consumer Agency Market Research Findings: Consumer Empowerment and Customer Service March 20 12 Research Conducted by. Key Findings Section 1: Consumer Empowerment Section 2: Customer Service Research Background and Methodology Profile of Sample. Table of Contents.

dannyc
Download Presentation

National Consumer Agency Market Research Findings: Consumer Empowerment and Customer Service

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. National Consumer Agency Market Research Findings: Consumer Empowerment and Customer Service March 2012 Research Conducted by

  2. Key Findings Section 1: Consumer Empowerment Section 2: Customer Service Research Background and Methodology Profile of Sample Table of Contents

  3. Key Findings

  4. Key Findings • Consumer Rights • 77% state they are confident of their rights (↓1% point) • 72% assert they are knowledgeable of their rights (↑1% point) • 76% feel protected in respect of their rights (↑5% points) • Customer Service • Supermarkets and shops selling clothing or footwear had the highest level of satisfaction with customer service, both at 91%. • The lowest level of satisfaction, at 64%, applied to those contacting airlines’ customer service, airlines also had the highest proportion claiming dissatisfaction at 30%. • Nearly 3 in 5 (57%) consumers state that as a result of receiving bad customer service they would stop doing business with a provider.

  5. Section 1: Consumer Empowerment

  6. Confidence about Rights as a Consumer (Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000)

  7. Knowledge about Consumer Rights (Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000)

  8. Protected Regarding Consumer Rights (Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000)

  9. Empowerment Levels x Profile of Sample (Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000) = Significantly higher than total sample = Significantly lower than total sample

  10. Section 2: Customer Service

  11. Experience with Customer Service – I (Base: All that have purchased goods services from each sector within the past 12 months) Contact with Customer Service Method of Contact Shops Selling Clothing or Footwear (Base: 941) Supermarkets (Base: 932) Communication Services e.g. Home phone, mobile, broadband (Base: 807) Banking Products and Services (Base: 758) Insurance Products & Services (Base: 692) Energy Suppliers (Base: 695)

  12. Experience with Customer Service – II (Base: All that have purchased goods services from each sector within the past 12 months) Contact with Customer Service Method of Contact TV Service Provider (Base: 628) Waste Services (Base: 592) Bus & Train Transport (Base: 471) Airlines (Base: 450) Shops Selling Furniture & Household Appliances (Base: 405) * Caution small base size

  13. Satisfaction with Customer Service – I (Base: All that had contact with customer service) Very dissatisfied (1) Very satisfied (5) (2) (4) 91% 91% 83% 83% 70% 76%

  14. Satisfaction with Customer Service – II (Base: All that had contact with customer service) Very dissatisfied (1) Very satisfied (5) (2) (4) 75% 75% 71% 70% 64% 30% * Caution small base size

  15. Likely Action as a Result of Good & Bad Customer Service (Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000) Bad customer service Good customer service % %

  16. Research Background and Methodology

  17. Research Background and Methodology • The research was conducted by means of face-to-face interviewing with 1,000 people between the ages of 15-74. • To ensure that the data is nationally representative, quotas were applied on the basis of age, gender and social class. • Interviewing was conducted over a four week period in November 2011. Nov/Dec 2007 Aug 2008 Nov/Dec 2008 May/June 2009 Benchmark Wave 1 Wave 2 Wave 3 Nov/Dec 2009 Nov/December 2010 May/June 2011 June 2010 Wave 4 Wave 5 Wave 6 Wave 7 Nov 2011 Current Wave Wave 8

  18. Profile of Sample - I (Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000) MAIN GROCERY SHOPPER % % % % 15-24 Dublin Male ABC1 F50+ Yes No 25-34 Rest of Leinster 35-44 45-54 Munster Female C2DE F50- 55+ Conn/ Ulster

  19. Profile of Sample – II – Main Grocery Shoppers (Base: All Mainly Responsible for Grocery Shopping in Home – 526) % % % % 15-24 (17) Male (49) Dublin (28) 25-34 (22) ABC1 F50+ (48) Rest of Leinster (26) 35-44 (19) 45-54 (16) Female (51) Munster (28) C2DE F50- (52) 55+ (26) Conn/ Ulster (18) ( ) = Total Sample

  20. Profile of Sample – III – Internet Use (Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000) USE INTERNET EVER PURCHASED ONLINE BANKING ONLINE (Base: All Internet Users - 762) (Base: All Internet Users - 762) (25%) Yes Yes Yes (30%) No No No (51%) (49%) (70%) (75%) % Yes % Yes % Yes () = June 2011

  21. Profile of Sample – IV – Social Media (Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000) Nov 2011 June 2011 Higher Amongst Type of phone % Regular users of ....... % 15-24 86% ABC1F50 59% Dublin 55% (21) Have a ‘Smart phone’ 15-24 21% 55+ 86% C2DEF50- 56% Munster 53% () = June 2011

More Related