1 / 6

Issue Summary

Issue: Need for contingency ops joint airfield criteria OEF and OIF lessons learned and field inputs highlight a disparity between the services, NATO, ICAO and host-nation In some cases criteria not followed & mishap or HATR followed Confusion exists on what criteria to use and when.

darius
Download Presentation

Issue Summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Issue: Need for contingency ops joint airfield criteria OEF and OIF lessons learned and field inputs highlight a disparity between the services, NATO, ICAO and host-nation In some cases criteria not followed & mishap or HATR followed Confusion exists on what criteria to use and when Issue Summary

  2. Actions to Date • Joint Airfield Operations Advisory Council established (USAF led) • Charter dictates the group can “develop initiatives, discuss dissimilarities, and develop/recommend joint positions on airfield ops issues” • Crossflow info on manning, facility procedures, developing positions toward FAA policies, etc. • Service reps meeting quarterly since Jun 04 • Numerous issues addressed to include development of standardized airfield criteria • JAOAC is advisory in nature…no way to enforce changes • Need alt way ahead to address standardization of airfield criteria

  3. Way Ahead • Establish Joint Airfield Operations Executive Steering Committee • Provides oversight to a joint airfield operations working group • Re-designate Joint Airfield Operations Advisory Council to a working group • Will include addition of more Subject Matter Experts (i.e: engineers, maintenance) • Start-up initiatives should include: • Establish a single contingency airfield criteria standard • Analyze existing criteria (UFCs, AFJMAN, ETLs, ACs, AFIs, T.O.s) • Investigate joint airfield management training opportunities • Standardize contingency air traffic control procedures • Develop additional contingency standardization initiatives

  4. BACKUP SLIDES

  5. Air Force/Service Differences Airfield Management TrainingAFArmy • Basic Tech School (6 weeks) • Duty locations – computer based training, local cert on AF, UFC criteria • Broadening asgmt to AMC/CRG • 7-level school (2 weeks) • 9-level school (3 weeks) • Eagle Flag expanding contingency trng opportunities • ACC developing Afld Ops Combat Readiness School • OJT for civilians at fixed bases, AD Army personnel do not perform AM function • No contingency training • No experience opportunities prior to deployment

  6. Airfield Criteria • ICAO • NATO • Host-Nation • FAA • AF • Sister Service • Unified Facilities Criteria 03-260-01 • AFJPAM 32-8013 V1&2 – contingency criteria between AF and Army • AFI 13-217, Engineering Technical Letter 04-2: LZs

More Related