1 / 35

Library Assessment Using the ACRL Standards:

Library Assessment Using the ACRL Standards: . Standards for Libraries in Higher Education (2004). Workshop Presenter Bob Fernekes fernekes@georgiasouthern.edu Georgia Southern University. Information Services Librarian Business Specialist, Co-liaison, COBA

davin
Download Presentation

Library Assessment Using the ACRL Standards:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Library Assessment Using the ACRL Standards: Standards for Libraries in Higher Education (2004)

  2. Workshop PresenterBob Fernekesfernekes@georgiasouthern.eduGeorgia Southern University • Information Services Librarian • Business Specialist, Co-liaison, COBA • Member – ACRL Standards Committees: (CLS - 1998-2003, ULS - 2001-04) • Member – ACRL College and Research Libraries Standards Task Force (2002-04)

  3. Workshop PresenterBill Nelsonwnelson@aug.eduAugusta State University • Library Director • Chair – ACRL Standards & Accreditation Comm. (2005-06) • Chair – CLS Standards Committee (2000-04) • Member – ACRL College and Research Libraries Standards Task Force (2002-04) • Member – ACRL Task Force on Academic Library Outcomes Assessment (1996-98) • Experienced U.S. Regional Accreditation Library Evaluator (Southern Association)

  4. Agenda • Introduction • Background • Layout & Use of the Workbook • Essence of the ACRL Library Standards • Practical Applications: • Planning, Outcomes & Outcomes Assessment • Services through Budget Sections • Communication & Cooperation, Admin, Budget • Questions, Comments & Feedback

  5. Introduction • Purpose: • To provide an introduction to the Standards for Libraries in Higher Education (2004) • To introduce a workbook to assist in applying the Standards • To provide some practical suggestions on how to apply the Standards http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/standardslibraries.htm

  6. Introduction (continued) • To Accomplish Workshop Objectives: • Demonstrate how to translate Strategy, Vision, CoreValues, and Mission into specific objectives & measures • Present Key Concepts, Trends and Strategies • Demonstrate how the Standards are relevant to all academic libraries • Provide an approach to solve the Assessment Challenge

  7. Organization and Use of Workbook • Developed in three Parts: • Part I: Planning, Assessment, and Outcomes Assessment • Part II: Services, Instruction, Resources, Access, Staff, and Facilities • Part III: Communication & Cooperation, Administration, and Budget • Appendices

  8. Library Effectiveness • An effective library must: • Employ planning, assessment, & outcomes assessment • Define, measure, assess, & report results • Select meaningful & doable measures • Use data effectively • for assessment • to support budget requests

  9. Background • ACRL Task Force Reports – Address shortcomings: • Standards Study, 1996 • Academic Library Outcomes Assessment, 1998 • Academic Library Standards, 2004 • Regional Accrediting Assn Standards • Becoming less-prescriptive • Greater Focus on Student Learning and Assessment

  10. ACRL Standards, 2000 Edition • Introduces and describes: • The Use of Suggested Points of Comparison • The Use of Outcomes Assessment • . . . Qualitative measures to assess: • User Satisfaction • Service Quality • Self-Assessments • . . . Quantitative measures(Inputs and Outputs) for: • Internal Trend Analysis • Comparison with Peers

  11. Standards for Libraries in Higher Education • College Library Standards: • The basis of this set of standards • Same format: minimal changes • New Elements: • Replaces “college” with “institution” • Name changed—“higher education” used, to include some technical institutes • Final document found at:http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/standardslibraries.htm

  12. View from the Library • Libraries are in transition - focus onaccountability, assessment of student performance, greater need for staff training, financial pressures, expectation for rapid document delivery, user education in new technologies, migration to online full-text sources • Need examples of Best Practices – that maximize the use of resources and integrate measures that matter • Mission includes support for Distance Learners • Still need meaningful quantitative measures

  13. The Challenge: • Institution – prove that it is effective in teaching students (assess student learning). • Library – demonstrate ways in which library users are changed as a result of their contact with library services, resources and programs and assess student learning and impact.

  14. The Solution is . . . • Involve the library in your institution’s strategic planning process (Activity Session) • Establish Expected Outcomes and Means for Assessing Each Outcome • Provide better documentation that reinforces the link between services, instruction, access, resources, staff and facilitieswith: • student learning, • educational impact, • continuing improvement

  15. The Solution (continued) • Establish a Culture of Evidence: “. . . specify library performance indicators whose measures can provide a culture of evidence to document progress and contributions toward the realization of campuswide outcomes and goals…” Bonnie Gratch-Lindauer City College of San Francisco

  16. The Solution (continued) • Prepare for your next Library Assessment: • Use your current professional standards & the ACRL Standards for Libraries in Higher Education • Integrate library assessment into institution review processes • Use measures that assess learning outcomes • Prepare better documentation

  17. The Solution (continued) • Culture of Evidence - How? • Approach the Challenge by using different measures for a given process, program, activity or initiative to assess accomplishment of library goals and objectives • Establish your Culture of Evidence within the context of Your Institution • Measures indicating the same general result will support Your contention • Could be considered a “Culture of Assessment”

  18. The Solution (continued) • Use Suggested Points of Comparison: • For longitudinal and peer comparison • Coordinate with peers toenlist cooperation and toverify data • Ensure that your library submits complete and accurate data • Use several years’ data to establish trends • Use more than one database or data set

  19. The Solution (continued) • Assess the library’s Institutional Effectiveness • Establish goals and objectives that are linked to institutional or campus-wide goals. • Establish and Assess Learning Outcomes • Assess the impact of library services, activities and programs on the Teaching-Learning Environment (support of student learning)

  20. Practical Applications Planning and Assessment Process Services through Budget Sections Communication & Cooperation, Administration, and Budget

  21. Part I: Planning, Assessment and Outcomes Assessment • Introduces the overall assessment process for the other nine sections • Introduces Key Themes and Ideas • Answers three basic questions • Your Library Assessment Plan fine tuned to implement the ACRL Standards • Review Institution and Library Mission Statements

  22. Planning, Assessment and Outcomes Assessment-------The Outcomes Assessment ProcessAnswers Three Basic Questions: • What are we doing well? • What do we need to do better? • Should we do something else in order to achieve our vision?

  23. PLANNING • Workbook, p. 5 ff • Academic library assessment must begin with the institutional mission • Must be consistent with institutional mission

  24. ASSESSMENT • Workbook, p. 11 ff • Consider using a Planning Matrix • Planning Matrix – Example • Only a Plan • Completed Planning Matrix • Includes: Implementation & Results

  25. Planning Matrix For Planning Purposes Completed Plan

  26. Library Assessment Plan • Example (pp. 14; 15; 29-33) • Some Formal Evaluation Tools (p. 21) • Identifying Existing Institutional Evidence (p. 22) • Your Library Assessment Plan • A Blank Worksheet is provided • Examples: http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/aboutacrl/acrlsections/collegelibraries/collpubs/Standards.pdf

  27. Planning, Assessment, & Outcomes Assessment (Evaluation): CLOSING THE LOOP

  28. How to Close the Loop • Review Library Mission Statement • Review Purposes and Goals • Review Evaluation Procedure and Assessment Strategy for each Goal • Review Use of Assessment Results • Evaluate Goals Attainment/Budget Request

  29. Closing the Loop - Use Results: • As the basis for building a revised set of Assessment Procedures & Strategies • To assess Purposes & Goals • Use data to support budget requests • To “prove” that the graduating student is better as a result of the library’s contribution to teaching and learning

  30. Part III:Communication & Cooperation, Administration, and Budget • All three sections are compliance oriented • Review all applicable standards for compliance issues • Review requirements in each section of the Standards for Libraries in Higher Education • Use the results from multiple measures to demonstrate compliance and assess institutional climate

  31. Communication & Cooperation, Administration, Budget • These 3 sections have assessment elements in common • All 3 areas have basically compliance issues, i.e., you are either doing them, or not • Answer the questions from the standards • Ensure compliance with specific accreditation requirements • Use peer comparison to demonstrate level of compliance

  32. Part II: Overview Services, Instruction, Resources, Access, Staff & Facilities • Introduces an Assessment Diagram – links library goals & objectives to institutional goals: • Student Learning Outcomes • Impact of the Library on Teaching–Learning • Glossary of Key Assessment Concepts, Topics and Terminology

  33. Part II: Library Effectiveness ReviewServices Thru Facilities • Workbook provides: • Key Themes and Essential Ideas • Practical Solutions, Performance Charts, Checklists for identifying items to include in your response to Evaluation Questions, and User Survey Sample Questions (where applicable) • Handouts provide: • Tips for Bridging the Gap • Measures of Success Stated as Outcomes • Sample Means for Assessment • Strategic Planning Activity Worksheet

  34. Activity Session Worksheet:Strategic Planning and Institutional Effectiveness • List Key Elements from Institution Vision, Core Values and Mission • Identify Library Services, Programs & Activities Supporting Each Element • Identify Outcomes and Means for Assessment • Group Reports & Discussion

  35. Closing Remarks,Questions, Comments & Feedback • Assessment Process Tips • Lessons Learned: • Answer three basic questions • Develop Your Library Assessment Plan to support Your Institution’s Strategic Plan and attainment of specific institutional goals and objectives

More Related