1 / 14

Personal Tutoring - What s tudents want : First Year Students Experiences

Personal Tutoring - What s tudents want : First Year Students Experiences. Background: Transition: many not prepared for managing the demands of Higher Education (e.g. Cook & Leckey, 1999)

dawn
Download Presentation

Personal Tutoring - What s tudents want : First Year Students Experiences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Personal Tutoring - What students want : First Year Students Experiences Background: • Transition: many not prepared for managing the demands of Higher Education (e.g. Cook & Leckey, 1999) • Early intervention: ‘bridge the gap between school and university quickly & effectively’ (e.g. Lowe & Cook, 2003) • Social and Academic Integration: academic and social integration are vital during students’ first year at University, as is institutional commitment to giving support (e.g. Tinto, 1996, 2002) • Sense of Belonging: a ‘sense of belonging in students’ can make the difference between ‘dropping out’ and staying on for some students (e.g.Kember, Lee & Li, 2002)

  2. Student Perspectives on Personal Tutoring: What do students want? Hixenbaugh P., Pearson C., Williams. D. (2006) • Aim: To explore the experiences of our first year students and personal tutors (Regent Street Campus) • Design: • Questionnaire to all teaching staff • Questionnaire to all first year students • Interviews 1st year course representatives – Psychology, Modern Languages, English and Law • Focus Groups – 48 1st year Psychology undergraduates • Interviews - with 15 1st, 2nd and 3rd year undergraduates

  3. Results: • Teaching Staff Questionnaire - Main Points: • Agreement 1st year tutees have the greatest need for personal tutoring • Majority 62% felt the personal tutoring system was working well for both staff and students • Student Questionnaire – Questions: • Considered ‘dropping out’? • Who they had talked to? • Personal tutoring – frequency, continuity, accessibility, helpfulness & satisfaction, wanted, improvement

  4. Findings: • 69.8% - met personal tutor during Induction • 10.5% - didn’t know the name of personal tutor • 55% - stated didn’t need to see personal tutor – although some had on 15 or more occasions • Data suggested: • Students wanted to see their personal tutor more than they needed to see them • Students gained a sense of support from the knowledge that they could approach their personal tutor – regardless of whether they needed to or not

  5. Retention: • 18.6% - considered ‘dropping out’ – financial difficulty, volume/pressure/difficulty of work, feeling overwhelmed • Data suggested: • Lack of confidence – ability to cope with demands • Social Network system – main source of support • Cause of concern – 26.3% reported not discussing this with anyone

  6. Personal Tutoring wanted: • Academic and Personal Advice • Continuity • Greater Accessibility • Dissatisfaction - most were actually happy with personal tutors - small number expressed dissatisfaction suggesting tutors needed to: • Understand students better • Cooperate with students more • Be more reliable • Form closer links • Structured regular sessions with active feedback and some sessions compulsory

  7. Student Focus Groups and Interviews: • 1. First Contact with Personal Tutor: • All had met their personal tutor during induction • Initial meeting positive - exchange relevant information • All but one reported being happy with the initial contact • 2. Personal experience of Personal Tutoring System • Amount of Contact - sporadic but all had seen personal tutors at least twice. Very little development of relationship with tutor for most

  8. Accessibility – major issue for most students • Practical Level – accessible through office hours, email & phone. BUT stressed need for speedy responses • Personal Level – overall positive experience • tutors seen as ‘busy people’ reluctant to bother them • tutors ‘gender’ raised • approachability: • positive = sociable, helpful & understanding • negative = general manner, tone of voice, no familiarity

  9. Support: • Academic Support – overall positive. Academic support seemed to take two forms: • University Processes: advice was given on processes such as plagiarism and internal referrals, fees and module enquires • Course Related Issues:advice in terms of referrals to appropriate material, books, websites and other staff • Personal Support – concern none of the students had seen their personal tutors on personal matters • one student would have been appropriate • others felt unable to go to their personal tutor – despite actually experiencing difficulties

  10. Suggestions: • Enforced Meetings – not just ‘drop in sessions’ • Email Contact - by students • Academic Tutorials – throughout 1st yr. • Selection of tutors – more selective • Mobile phones contact – main contact source for students • Coverage for absenteeism • Conclusions: • System working well in places • Evidence of good practice • Students wanted more structure • Personal tutors should take more active role • Students want to be able to relate to tutors, they should be enthusiastic and care about them • Overall Conclusion – we should be PROACTIVE not REACTIVE

  11. Other research findings relevant to retention: • Students both implicitly and explicitly reported that they had developed a ‘lack of motivation to attend’ • Isolation – have to make a number of difficult transitional moves: directed to self-directed learning; controlled to self-control; familiarity to anonymity; teaching led tutorial to student led tutorial contact • Demoralisation– heavy work load; deadlines; perceived lack of help from staff; fear of failure • In turn this led to feelings about ‘dropping out’ – wanted better pastoral care and a clearer definition of tutoring system

  12. What changes were made? • Major changes in particular to level 4 – across the University • Department of Psychology: • Induction – social event to meet Personal Tutors, Key staff and other staff members • Tutoring linked to year long core module – Research Methods – Practical sessions taken by tutors • Full time/fractional staff only • Designated Office hours - two hours per week • E-Mentoring • Attendance monitoring and follow up • 1st Year Coordinator

  13. Personal Tutor Policy ‘organic process’ – systematic reviews of quality and standards; Proactive Approach • Other Initiatives: • 30 credit year long modules – continuity, deep learning • Westminster Change Academy - joint project with SU • Student Forum – agenda set by students (3 per year) • Student Charter - • Has it made a difference? • Retention rates are improving year on year. • Contact: pearsoc@wmin.ac.uk

More Related