1 / 17

Land Use Controls Where are we now?

Land Use Controls Where are we now?. Brownfields 2003 Conference Portland, Oregon October 26 th , 2003. What Is ICMA?. Association of over 8,000 local government managers and their staff Mission: enhance the profession of local government management Services include:

debram
Download Presentation

Land Use Controls Where are we now?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Land Use Controls Where are we now? Brownfields 2003 Conference Portland, Oregon October 26th, 2003

  2. What Is ICMA? • Association of over 8,000 local government managers and their staff • Mission: enhance the profession of local government management • Services include: - Education & training - Research on cutting-edge issues - Information clearinghouse

  3. Preview • Set the Stage • Where are we today? • Where do we go tomorrow? • Building the capacity of local govts. • Land use decision making • Information infrastructure • Life cycle costing and financing

  4. www.LUCs.org Virtual encyclopedia of resources and information BFs, military bases, and SF sites Publications: Beyond Fences (2000) Peer Exhange (2003) Tracking (2003) Research Forums (2001-2002) San Diego: LUC information infrastructure San Antonio: local government costs National Stakeholders Forum on Federal sites LUCIP—Denver and Colorado (2003) ICMA’s Research & TA Resources

  5. Gap Analysis • Identify major gaps or issues in LUC design, selection, implementation, and enforcement • Work with practitioners and policymakers to close the gaps and address the issues • Think about the LUC challenges on the horizon

  6. What is a Land Use Control? Administrative and/or legal mechanisms that minimize the potential exposure/risk to human health and the environment from the remaining contamination left on site

  7. Basic Assumptions • Terminology: LUCs vs. ICs vs. AUL • LUCs integrate public health, land use, and economic revitalization • LUCs are appropriate and properly in place • Variety of sites (BFs, SF, DOE, active & closed military bases, etc.) and laws/regulations. • Variety of institutional understanding and capacity

  8. Overall Observations • High degree of complexity • No single entity or institution can provide a 100% fail safe system • Making progress on LUC policy front • Different LUC models/systems

  9. LUC Models & Tools • Public: • State VCPs: covenants, easements, MOUs • State and local registries and tracking systems • LUCIPs • Local land development systems • Private: • One call utility notification systems • Guardian trust • Environmental insurance • Hybrids: coordination among multiple systems

  10. State and Local Research Results • Actions re land happen at the local level: new development, property transfer, first to get the call. • Leverage existing state and local govt. infrastructure and respective strengths • Local governments in ideal position to facilitate long term stewardship • Close coordination with state regulators

  11. Core Local Govt. Strengths • Local Land use: improve the adaptability of state and local land development/zoning practices to LUCs • Info infrastructure: improve the data management and permitting systems of state and local governments to track LUCs

  12. Core Local Govt. Strengths • Life cycle costs: improve the identification of local govt. life cycle costs for LUC selection, implementation, and enforcement • Enforcement: outline and enhance the role of local government

  13. Information Infrastructure Forum • Goal: provide notice to affected stakeholders as early as possible to prevent/manage unreasonable risk of exposure to soil and GW contamination • Who should get the information? • When should they get the information • What type of information should they get? • How to manage and disseminate the information?

  14. A Network of Systems • Local land use tracking and permitting systems • Local inventories • County recordation • State inventories & LUC tracking • Federal inventories & LUC tracking • Private sector strategies: trusts and One-Call utility notification systems

  15. System Design and Management • Uniformity of information • Compatibility of systems: standardization, protocols, links, etc. • Ease of access and security • Costs and financing info infrastructure • Outline core city responsibilities

  16. Next Steps • Collaborative design & planning: LUCIPs • Coordination of state and local LUC data systems • Reach out to new stakeholders • Capacity building, training, and education • Explore creative approaches to implement and enforce LUCs • Financing of LUC administration • Comparative life cycle cost analysis of LUCs

  17. Contact Information • Joe Schilling, Director of Community & Economic Development Jschilling@icma.org • David Borak, LUC Project Manager • Dborak@icma.org • www.LUCs.org

More Related