Project Manager: Tim Brown Project Editor: Tabatha Doughty Project Engineer: Drew Furry

1. Project Manager: Tim Brown Project Editor: Tabatha Doughty Project Engineer: Drew Furry Project Engineer: Jim Walter

2. Today’s Agenda • Project Description & Approach • Alternative Solutions • Final Design Results • Proposed Roadway • Horizontal & Vertical Alignment • Pavement Design • Hydraulic Design • Construction Plan • Cost Analysis • Summary - Q & A

3. Project Description • 13-acres of land • Multiple curves in the road, storage buildings, railroad tracks and other outdoor storage • 0.6-mile road connects the main access highway to the storage facility • Recent changes in ordinance transport have brought up this issue

4. Project Description • Challenges • Railroad crossings must be limited • Crossing can not be over a “frog” • Road must meet Navy, INDOT, and AASHTO codes and regulations

6. Project Approach • Site Assessment - walkthrough, site survey, map overview • Existing Subsurface Conditions - Soil assessment - Boring samples from ATC Associates • Codes and Regulations - challenges- must comply with Navy, AASHTO and INDOT codes and regulations

7. Project Approach • Assessment of Design Constraints • Wildlife protection, subgrade conditions, hydrological issues • Design • Consider possible alternatives • Design appropriate solution based on criteria

8. Alternative Solutions • Five alternative solutions • Developed by RH Roadways with suggestions from client & faculty • Created Evaluation Matrix • Design of best alternative

9. Alternative 1 – Existing Road

10. Alternative 2 – Modify Existing Road

11. Alternative 3 – New Alignment South

12. Alternative 4 – New Alignment North A

13. Alternative 5 – New Alignment North B

14. Evaluation Matrix

15. Existing Roadway Roadway conditions fair/poor 7 RR crossings 85-feet radius of curvature 10% maximum vertical grade Little signage Proposed Roadway Excellent roadway conditions 5 RR Crossings 500-feet minimum radius of curvature 3% maximum vertical grade Proper signage (posted 25mph) Comparison

16. Existing Roadway Lack of pavement markings Width of 16-feet Average thickness of 4-inches Proposed Roadway Adequate markings (centerline, edges, etc.) Width of Road 24-feet with shoulders and ditches Pavement total thickness of 10-inches Comparison

17. Horizontal Alignment • Plan View Map

18. Typical Cross Section

19. Vertical Alignment • Profile View Map

20. Pavement Design • Computed an Equivalent Axel Load (EAL) • Traffic Study – 200 trucks per day each way • Used traffic data and tractor trailer dimensions and weight for EAL design - 2.9 Million EAL • Calculated Stacker EAL – insignificant • Pavement Thickness • CBR value from ATC Associates + EAL • Asphalt Institute Manual to design 4 options

21. Option1: 2” Asphalt Concrete Surface 9” Asphalt Concrete Base Option 3: 2” Asphalt Concrete Surface 8” Asphalt Concrete Base 6” Untreated Aggregate Subbase Option2: 2” Asphalt Concrete Surface 15” Type III Emulsified Asphalt Base Option 4: 2” Asphalt Concrete Surface 13.5” Type III Emulsified Asphalt Base 6” Untreated Aggregate Subbase Pavement Options

22. Data collected from INDOT website detailing their project costs for 2003. HMA costs include labor and equipment. Pavement Cost

23. Final Pavement Design 2” Asphalt Concrete Surface 8” Asphalt Concrete Base 6” Untreated Aggregate Subbase

24. Hydraulic Design • Place 3 culverts • Corrugated Metal Pipe – 12” Diameter • Ditches • Flow of 1.27 cubic feet per second • Depth = 0.5 feet • Slope = 3:1

25. Culvert Locations

26. Construction Alternatives • Traffic Control - Three Options • Method 1: • Complete shutdown of road with a detour to divert traffic during construction • Method 2: • Shut down one lane while remaining lane stays open for traffic flow • Method 3: • Same as method 2, save an added detour to ease traffic flow through the project area.

27. Traffic Detour Method Matrix

28. Traffic Control Method 3

29. Traffic Detour Route

30. Erosion & Sediment Control Plan • Erosion control points of interest: • Minimum clearing and grading • Minimum erosion due to short project time • Runoff is non-existent – no present streams • After bare soil removed, silt fences will be needed along sloped areas • Upon project completion, areas must be seeded and slopes protected with erosion control blankets in place

31. Erosion Control Map • Insert 11x17 erosion control map

32. Soil Management • Borrow location • Location for cut soil to be stored • “Phase-construction” • Topsoil stockpiles • Soil testing required according to AASHTO and INDOT Specifications

33. Waste Management • Large capacity worksite dumpsters • Construction fencing • Planned stockpiling • Pavement removal ~2500 yd^2

34. Cost Analysis

35. Summary • Project Description & Approach • Alternative Solutions • Final Design Results • Proposed Roadway • Horizontal & Vertical Alignment • Pavement Design • Hydraulic Design • Construction Plan • Soil & Waste Management • Cost Analysis

36. Questions???