1 / 19

The Consequences of Public College Tuition Inflation for Low-Income and Disadvantaged Students

The Consequences of Public College Tuition Inflation for Low-Income and Disadvantaged Students. Melissa L. Freeman Ohio University. The Consequences. Tuition has been increasing at an alarming rate 21 states have increased by at least 10% in 2002-03 Enrollment has been increasing as well

deepak
Download Presentation

The Consequences of Public College Tuition Inflation for Low-Income and Disadvantaged Students

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Consequences of Public College Tuition Inflation for Low-Income and Disadvantaged Students Melissa L. Freeman Ohio University

  2. The Consequences • Tuition has been increasing at an alarming rate • 21 states have increased by at least 10% in 2002-03 • Enrollment has been increasing as well • 15 million students enrolled in 2002-03 • 12 million enrolled in public institutions

  3. The Consequences • A paradox • Review of the literature about the effects of public tuition inflation on low-income and disadvantaged students

  4. The Consequences • Talented college-ready, low-income students often choose not to go to college • 2 million in first decade of 21st Century • One factor is public college tuition inflation • Rising prices have a chilling effect on low income enrollment

  5. The Consequences • This paper reviews the impact that price has on • Participation • Aspirations • Institutional choice • Persistence • Post graduation debt • Financial Nexus Model

  6. The Consequences • Price and participation • Leslie and Brinkman (1988), meta-analysis • For every $100 increase there was a drop of .7 percentage points in first time enrollment rate • Heller (1997), follow up • For every $100 increase there was a drop of .5 to 1.0 percentage points in first time enrollment rate

  7. The Consequences • Price and Aspirations • If students view college as unaffordable, they will not prepare. • Hossler, Schmidt, & Vesper (1999) • There is a difference between the factors that influence aspirations and those that influence achievement • Somers, Cofer, & VanderPutten (2002) • SES and college costs most influenced aspirations

  8. The Consequences • Price and Institutional Choice • Low income more likely to attend a two-year college • Rising prices • Shift from need-based aid to merit-based aid by states and loan aid by the feds • The Problem • Tuition and fees going up everywhere • Many potential four-year graduates stop after completing the two-year degree, dramatically and unnecessarily limiting life chances

  9. The Consequences • Racial segregation among types of public institutions • African-American’s attend their first choice less often • Attend institutions closer to home • Chose institution based on lower cost

  10. The Consequences • Price and Persistence • Previously, researchers questioned that price impacted persistence. • Upperclassmen less responsive to changes and more committed to completion • St. John, Paulsen, & Starkey (1996) • Link between persistence and tuition, subsidies, financial aid and living costs • Heller (2000) • For most racial groups, there was a strong correlation between continuing students and price

  11. The Consequences • Post Graduation Debt • Increasing tuition, reduced need-based aid requires increased reliance on loans. • Direct Student Aid--1991-1992 • 50% Grant Aid • 47% Loan Aid • 2% Work Aid • Direct Student Aid—2002-2003 • 42% Grant Aid • 57% Loan Aid • 1% Work Aid

  12. The Consequences • Low income students are more likely to enroll with grant aid than loan aid • Loan debt more likely inhibits low income enrollment • Borrowing is a much greater burden for low income students • Post graduation debt impacts students’ lives long after college, including what career path they may choose

  13. The Consequences • Financial Nexus • St. John, Paulsen, & Starkey (1996) • Model explains the complex interactions between finance and academic preparation in influencing college choice • Financial concerns present barriers at every stage of the college selection process—direct and indirect influence on enrollment behavior • Finances shape the expectations and condition the choices of students and families long before they are thinking about college

  14. The Consequences • Cumulative Consequences for Low-Income Students • Participation Rates • Economic Segregation by Institutional Type • Degree Attainment

  15. The Consequences • Participation Rates • Percentage of those who graduate from high school and go on to college. • Low income students are less likely to go • In 2001, participation by income quartile • 36.8% for bottom quartile • 53.9% for second quartile • 67.9% for third quartile • 78.6% for top quartile

  16. The Consequences • Participation by Minorities • In 1999 • Whites = 45.3% • Blacks = 39.2% • Hispanics = 31.6%

  17. The Consequences • Economic Segregation by Institutional Type • Low income students pushed toward 2 year schools • Resulted in the sorting and redistribution of higher education according to economic class

  18. The Consequences • Degree Attainment • Low income students less likely to receive a bachelor’s degree. • In 2001, bachelor’s degree completion by income quartiles • 12.2% for bottom quartile • 22.9% for second quartile • 36.2% for third quartile • 65.5% for top quartile

  19. The Consequences • Conclusion • Despite increased demand for higher education, low income and disadvantaged students still face a myriad of barriers to a higher education • Central to this is the lack of affordability

More Related