1 / 25

Presentation Outline

Design and Fabrication of a 4H SiC Betavoltaic Cell M.V.S. Chandrashekhar, C.I. Thomas, Hui Li, M.G. Spencer and Amit Lal Advanced Materials and Devices Applications (AMDA) Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA. Presentation Outline.

denton-rush
Download Presentation

Presentation Outline

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Design and Fabrication of a 4H SiC Betavoltaic CellM.V.S. Chandrashekhar, C.I. Thomas, Hui Li, M.G. Spencer and Amit LalAdvanced Materials and Devices Applications (AMDA)Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringCornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA

  2. Presentation Outline • Motivation • Review theory of betavoltaic cell • Potential loss mechanisms • Comparison of materials options and predicted efficiencies • Results to date • Conclusion

  3. Beta-Voltaic Battery

  4. Motivation • Long half lives of β-radiation sources. • Low energy sources are relatively benign • Small penetration depths • Significant power density in source

  5. Applications • Low accessibility sensor nodes • On-chip power source for MEMS • Standby power for cell-phones • Pacemaker power supply

  6. e- h h h Basic Operation High energy -particle E0 Optical /Acoustic phonons e- e- e- Optical/Acoustic phonons Recombination Ec EFn EFp Recombination Ev e-* ~Dp ~Dn

  7. Comparison with AA Battery

  8. Kinetic Energy Optical Phonons Impact Ionizations Bandgap Losses Hot Secondary Electrons Thermalization Loss e-h Pairs in Equilibrium Interaction of Hot Electrons with Semiconductors* • Electron-hole pairs • Secondary electrons • Backscattered electrons • Elastic scattering • Acoustic phonons ~50meV • Optical Phonons ~100meV * From Klein. C.A. JAP 39 p.2029

  9. Energy Bookkeeping • Important energy loss mechanisms accounted for by defining effective e-h pair creation energy: E=Eg+<Ek>+<ER> • E= 8.4eV for 4H SiC- energy independent • Backscattering losses accounted for by subtracting percentage η from incident electron energy E0 • Carrier multiplication achieved (1-η)E0/E

  10. RSeries I Voc V Ig RLoad Fill factor Isc Beta-voltaic Operation Voc=nkT/q ln(Isc/Isat)

  11. Prediction for Mature MaterialsOpen Circuit Voltage Tritium 1 1. Backscattering and fill factor effects included with 100% CCE.

  12. Prediction for Mature MaterialsEfficiency Tritium 1 1. Backscattering and fill factor effects included with 100% CCE.

  13. Prediction for Mature MaterialsPower Density Tritium

  14. Why SiC ? Property Band gap (eV) Breakdown field for 1017cm-3 (MV/cm) Saturated Electron Drift (cm/s) Electron mobility (cm2/Vs) Hole mobility (cm2/Vs) Thermal Conductivity (W/cmK) Si 1.1 0.6 107 1350 450 1.5 GaAs 1.42 0.65 1x107 6000 330 0.46 GaN 3.4 3.5 1.5x107 1000 300 1.3 3C-SiC 2.36 1.5 2.5x107 <800 <320 5.0 4H-SiC 3.2 3-5 2x107 <900 <120 4.9 6H-SiC 3.0 3-5 2.5x107 <400 <90 4.9 • SiC Beta Voltaic Cell are promising for nano-watt power generation High electric breakdown field High saturated electron velocity High thermal conductivity • Suited for high temperature, high power, high frequency, high radiation environment

  15. 4H SiC as Cell Material • 4H SiC is ideal material owing to its large bandgap (3.3eV) • Low realizable leakage current-substrates • 4H SiC is extremely radiation hard • Low Z-elements • Minimal loss from backscattering. • Significant progress in SiC radiation detectors with charge collection efficiencies (CCE) close to 100%.

  16. Betavoltaic Cell Design Considerations • Absorption depth of electrons • Bethe range ~E01.6 = 3µm@17keV • Determines junction width and depth • Backscattering of electrons from high Z-contact • Self absorption in source • Not considered here

  17. Materials are grown at Cornell in a VEECO D180 SiC rotating disc multi-wafer reactor • Growth Temperature-1600°C • Rotation-1000 rpm • Growth Pressure 50-300 torr

  18. High resistance contact Forward active region-used to extract J0 Noise J0=10-17A/cm2 n=2 4H SiC Deep Junction PN Diode I-V Characteristics • Junction depth is 0.5 μm. • J0=10-17A/cm2, n=2 • J0=10-24A/cm2 withn=2 available commercially-achievable.

  19. Probe inside SEM 17 kV electrons from SEM Annealed contacts - pn diode V Voltmeter P substrate + Evaluation of Radiation Cell in SEM • 17 kV electron beam to simulate Ni-63 source • Magnification changes current density • Lowest incident current density 0.3 nA/cm2. • higher than Ni-63 source - 6 pA/cm2 • comparable to tritium source ~2 nA/cm2

  20. Collection of Charge • Efficiency up to 14% for high current density with no edge recombination

  21. Efficiency= 6% Voc=0.72V “FF”=0.52 Irradiation with Ni-63

  22. Irradiation with Ni-63 • Power conversion efficiency of 6% and Voc=0.72V • Limited by “fill factor” and edge recombination. • Better fill factor ~75% at higher currents-contacts • Equivalent corrected efficiency ~15%- approaches predicted value. • Enhanced current multiplication compared to monochromatic electron illumination ~2400 • Ni-63 irradiated output stable after ten days of continuous monitoring.

  23. Irradiation with Tritium • Under Tritium illumination Jsc= 1.2 μA/cm2 observed in deeper junction 0.5 µm • 96 µA/Ci vs ~20 µA/Ci in Si • Voc= ~1V vs <0.1V in Si • Unpassivated efficiency of ~10% vs0.22% in Si • Estimated power 1 μW/cm2 • New shallow junction 0.25 µm expected to show unpassivated efficiency of ~20% with power density of ~2μW/cm2-useful!

  24. Top view Tritiated water Thin p type diffused contact layer 2x radiation penetration depth n- epitaxial layer

  25. Conclusion • Efficiency of 6% demonstrated for shallow junction under Ni-63 illumination. • Highest efficiency of ~10% and power density 1.0 μW/cm2 observed under Tritium illumination. • Efficiency limited by edge recombination and poor “fill factor” from poor contacts • Can scale to ~0.4 mW/cm2 for single layer by utilizing high aspect ratio structures.

More Related