1 / 17

CMS GBT Use Cases and Requirements Time Constraints 20090505 magnus.hansen@cern.ch

CMS GBT Use Cases and Requirements Time Constraints 20090505 magnus.hansen@cern.ch. CMS GBT. Specification discussion on the 15/4 2009 Presentations CMS HCAL by Chris Tully, Princeton CMS Tracker by Karl Gill, CERN CMS DT Muons by Christina Fernandez, CIEMAT Conclusion

deon
Download Presentation

CMS GBT Use Cases and Requirements Time Constraints 20090505 magnus.hansen@cern.ch

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CMS GBT Use Cases and Requirements Time Constraints 20090505 magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  2. CMS GBT • Specification discussion on the 15/4 2009 • Presentations • CMS HCAL by Chris Tully, Princeton • CMS Tracker by Karl Gill, CERN • CMS DT Muons by Christina Fernandez, CIEMAT • Conclusion • CMS has a reasonably consistent view of the requirements • No contradictory requirements were found M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  3. CMS Users • CMS HCAL stage 1 Upgrade • GBT is the baseline • GBT Specification as a whole seem adequate • CMS Tracker stage 2 upgrade • GBT (or successor) is likely to be the baseline • CMS Pixels stage 2 upgrade • GBT (or successor) is likely to be the baseline • Potential users stage 2 • ECAL and HCAL End caps • Muons (DT) M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  4. CMS HCAL • CMS HCAL stage 1 upgrade is highly constraint by the installed infrastructure • Crates (RBX = Readout Boxes) • Installed fibers • Control and readout • Cooling • Power M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  5. CMS HCAL Front-endDigital Transmitter Board • 72 HB/HE RBX, 4 RM/RBX, 8 Fibers/RM 180 mm 8 Optical Fibers 75 mm Chris Tully

  6. CMS HCALGBT Use Cases Off Detector • GBT RxTx for FE control • TTC Relay • Clocks • Synchronous Commands • RM Configuration • GBT Tx, sCCA, QIE • Negligible bandwidth • GBT Tx for Data Transmission • 82 user bits needed • Parallel mode • All “Trigger” Data • 2 bits potentially left for status flags or time markers RBX Control Server sHTR sHTR sHTR RBX On Detector (72 RBXes) 1 GBT RxTx CCM Clock and Control Module 8 GBT Tx RM Readout Module 8 GBT Tx RM Readout Module 8 GBT Tx RM Readout Module Clock Control M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  7. Total Integrated Neutron FluenceRadiation Levels for Electronics • Similar Radiation Hardness Studies for SiPMs Performed Recently at Neutron Irradiation Facility at Massachusetts General Hospital Chris Tully

  8. CMS HCAL Time line • FE design has been modified to give more time for the GBT development • Pre-production need to be available around spring 2011 for tests • Few 100 chips • Production need to be available by Autumn 2011 • 5000 chips • CMS HCAL community is open for suggestions about how to help with the GBT development • Radiation tests etc. M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  9. CMS Pixel upgrade • Roland and Hans Christian are responsible • Phase 1 upgrade • not foreseen to use GBT • Phase 2 upgrade • It is too early to discuss. The team is busy with the Stage 1 Upgrade M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  10. CMS Silicon Strip Tracker • Layout is not decided • Requirements are preliminary • What follows is derived from an example layout from D. Abbaneo et. al. (right) • What will not change • Front end Control through GBT • TTC through GBT • Constant predictable latency • in particular for the down link (CR -> Exp) • Negligible error rate • Power budget crucial M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  11. CMS Silicon Strip TrackerPt layers for track trigger • Based on a set of assumptions • ~1000 GBTs Karl Gill Geoff Hall M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  12. CMS Silicon Strip TrackerOuter Tracker • Un-sparsified, synchronous binary readout with CBC chip • 100kHz trigger rate • APV-like frame output • Data rate 20MBit/s per CBC • 11k modules, 17M channels • ~1000 GBTs • Expect 1 GBT filled per ‘rod’ of 12 modules in outer barrel Three 4xMUX + copper link drivers each output 80Mbit/s TCS I/O DC-DC shielded micro-twisted pairs I/O DC-DC out 2.5V c c Sensor HV 12x CBC 128ch each wire bonded 20Mbit/s out each Silicon T sensor DCU Sensor with 2x 5cm strips 2x 768 @120um pitch integrated pitch adaptor c c Karl Gill Geoff Hall M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  13. Summary of TrackerPreliminary Requirements • Sufficient overall bandwidth with low overhead • Will probably need several thousand GBT (excluding pixels) • Need solution to concentrate data onto high bandwidth links • Need low power solution to transmit data to the optical hub (GBTX/VOL) • Considering how to reduce number of links in PT layers • E.g. if we can avoid reading out at 40MHz • Want minimal power for adequate functionality, radiation resistance, reliability • Want minimal material/mass/packaging inside Tracking volume • Move GBTX and VOL outside sensitive volume(s) if possible • Have to measure power/signal integrity on different cables, of different lengths at different bit rates • Weigh up cost/benefit of many Cu- cables versus GBTX nearer front-end. • Require low noise contribution at sensors • Want ease of use/configuration/test of TK system to be kept in mind • Cost and timescales must be inside budget (to be decided) • Will expect more (TK-specific) points to come, plus pixels in due course Karl Gill Geoff Hall

  14. Other CMS Users • ECAL and HCAL End caps Stage 2 Upgrade • Studies On-going • Higher effective bandwidth would be welcome • Likely to be around 2000 chips +/- 50% • ECAL Barrel Stage 2 Upgrade • As above but also subject to reliability of the current system • Higher effective bandwidth would be welcomed • Likely to be around 10000 chips M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  15. Other CMS Users • Muons (DT) • Studies On-going • Radiation levels as CMS HCAL • Schedule as Stage 2 upgrade M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  16. General Requirements • Front end Control through GBT • Write and Read Access • TTC through GBT • Constant predictable latency • in particular for the down link (CR -> Exp) • Negligible error rate • Power budget is crucial • Maybe less so for ECAL M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  17. CMS GBT Time Line • 2011 • April • HCAL Pre-production Test ready for test beam in Summer • September • HCAL Production • Tracker Demonstrator tests • 2014 +/- 1 year • Stage 2 production of Electronics • 2018 +/- 2 years • Stage 2 LHC Upgrade M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

More Related