1 / 25

Advising At-Risk Students: An Early Warning Effort

Advising At-Risk Students: An Early Warning Effort. Phil Warsaba, Student Academic Success Centre (SASC) CACUSS 2007 – Building Bridges. Student Academic Success Centre. Carleton University’s centralized academic advising and learning support office.

despina
Download Presentation

Advising At-Risk Students: An Early Warning Effort

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Advising At-Risk Students: An Early Warning Effort Phil Warsaba, Student Academic Success Centre (SASC) CACUSS 2007 – Building Bridges

  2. Student Academic Success Centre • Carleton University’s centralized academic advising and learning support office. • Composed of 3 offices: Academic Advising Centre, Learning Support Services, and Peer-Assisted Study Sessions.

  3. Academic Advising Centre Staff • The unit is staffed by: • Manager • 8 F/T Academic Advisors • 2 P/T Academic Advisors • Administrative Assistant • 3-5 P/T students

  4. SASC’s Mandate • The SASC mission is to help students build a foundation for academic success through the provision of programs and services that foster personal direction and academic competence. • The Student Academic Success Centre was established to: • Improve the university’s retention and graduation rates; • Enhance the undergraduate university experience, particularly in the first and second years; • Ensure the academic success of students.

  5. The Role of Academic Advisors • Help students understand academic rules and regulations. • Unravel the mysteries of the audit, CGPA calculation, requirements for graduation, etc. • Assist students with the development of effective study skills and strategies for academic success. • Guide students through academic difficulties they may be facing.

  6. Approach to Students • Focus on students and on their (individual) on-going needs over an extended period of time. One advising session builds upon another. • Students are viewed as partners who are actively engaged in intellectual and personal growth. • Help students think about and articulate what is important to them in their academic and personal lives. • Set short-term as well as long-term goals, discuss ways to achieve those goals, and help the student monitor progress in fulfilling those goals.

  7. Academic Improvement Planning • A significant number of students that meet with Advisors at SASC are on AW, SUS, DEB, or ITR. • Students with negative Academic Performance Evaluations (APEs) meet with Advisors to develop an Academic improvement Plan (AIP).

  8. Commitment to Student Success • SASC is committed to: • Guiding students through the challenges that are impeding their ability to succeed, AND; • Identifying students who are at risk of academic difficulty and addressing potential problems before they arise.

  9. Academic Outreach • SASC currently provides the following services for at-risk or potential at-risk groups: • Academic Improvement Planning (AIP) sessions for students on Academic Warning; • Varsity athlete workshops and one-on-one advising; • Aboriginal programming; • First Year Information (FYI) in-class workshops for FYSM students; • direct referral for students with disabilities; • Intervention advising for first-year students who have withdrawn from 1.0 or more credits in their first term of study; • Intervention advising for first-year students who have received a No Decision standing; • Intervention advising for upper-year undeclared students; • Intervention advising for students with multiple exam and/or assignment deferrals;

  10. University Indicators of Academic Difficulty • Course success rates are used to identify traditionally difficult classes at the university. • High DFW rates have been associated with higher attrition rates. • Deans and Associate Deans have been tasked with the challenge of improving course success rates in their respective Faculties.

  11. The Need for a New Early Warning Initiative • Faculty members identified class attendance as a systematic problem. • Students were found to be unaware of basic rules and regulations. • Feedback being provided to students too late to effect any significant change.

  12. A Model for Change • Re-Engagement Through Academic Intervention Now (RETAIN) program at Marymount College (Palos Verdes, CA). • Joe Cuseo’s (2003) research on Early-Alert (Warning) Systems. • Tinto’s (1993) research on the causes and cures of student attrition.

  13. Proposal for an Early Warning Initiative (EWI) at Carleton • In late January, 2007, SASC distributed a preliminary proposal for a new EWI. • Faculty of Engineering demonstrated immediate interest. • SASC agreed to conduct a small-scale pilot project to assist ENG with 5 traditionally difficult courses.

  14. Structure of the EWI Pilot Project • ENG identified 5 courses (1 first-year, 3 second-year, and 1 third-year) with high DFW rates. • Professors were asked to assess the performance of students in the following areas: • Attendance (class and labs) • Assignments • Practical exams

  15. Structure of the EWI Pilot Project • A list of 59 students was sent to SASC for follow-up between the 3rd and 6th week of the course (pre-midterm). • Advisors conducted a condensed performance evaluation for each student. • Students were first contacted by phone (2 attempts) or sent an email. • The importance of class attendance was discussed and students were encouraged to book an AIP appointment at SASC.

  16. Response Rates • Nearly 60% of students contacted responded to the outreach (compared to a 7% response rate to the Faculty outreach). • 50% of respondents subsequently met with an Academic Advisor to develop an Academic Improvement Plan. • Response rates are similar to those resulting from SASC’s outreach to students on AW.

  17. Student Perceptions • With very few exceptions, students were genuinely pleased with the outreach. • Many expressed surprised that the university was aware of class absences. • Others noted that it was the first time they felt that someone at the university cared about their academic success.

  18. Common Explanations • Students offered the following explanations for their lack of engagement/poor performance in the course: • Late registration • Intention to withdraw • Ineffective time management skills • Sense that the material covered in class was a review of what they already knew • Decreased motivation • Little understanding of the relationship between attendance and grades

  19. Identifying At-Risk Students • Of the students contacted as part of this EWI: • 37% had earned 3.0 or more discredits • 14% were to be Ineligible to Return (ITR) • 9% were on Academic Warning • 12% had deferred examinations from the Fall term • Only 7% of the students identified by the Faculty of Engineering were intending to withdraw from the course they were registered in.

  20. Course-Level Outcomes • Immediate and sustained increased in class attendance was reported for each of the 5 courses. • Of the students who booked a follow-up AIP appointment with an Academic Advisor, only 2 were classified as Ineligible to Return to ENG. • D and F rates for each of the 5 courses decreased, while course Withdrawal rates increased. • Increased awareness, and use of, support services.

  21. University-Level Outcomes • Increased awareness of the relationship between attendance and academic difficulties. • Project triggered a university-wide attendance survey. • Individual faculty members appreciated collaboration and support.

  22. Future Directions • A proposal has been submitted to offer a EWI of this kind to 10 traditionally difficult first-year courses in the fall of 2008. • Support of 20+ courses with low course success rates is envisioned for 2009-2010 academic year.

  23. Challenges • Resources, resources, resources… • The Advising Centre alone provides 10,000 individual consultations per year. • To be effective, a pre-midterm alert effort requires sustained contact and follow-up on the part of Advisors. • First-year student compliance could be an issue. • Students identified in outreach efforts are often at the pre-contemplation stage in the Stages of Change model. • Remedial perceptions of services and programs offered.

  24. Applicability • Centralized advising is not required for Early Warning Efforts. • We need to foster a culture of engagement, where attendance is emphasized. • Advisors, Counsellors and other student service professionals should prioritize early assessment and guidance.

  25. Enjoy the Banquet! Thank you!

More Related